During the practice sessions the critic’s role is to elabora...
Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Ano: 2008
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
SERPRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2008 - SERPRO - Analista - Tecnologia da Informação
|
CESPE - 2008 - SERPRO - Analista - Programação Visual |
CESPE - 2008 - SERPRO - Analista - Suporte Técnico |
CESPE - 2008 - SERPRO - Analista - Biblioteconomia |
CESPE - 2008 - SERPRO - Analista - Negócios em Tecnologia da Informação |
Q149205
Inglês
Texto associado
One frequently overlooked area in planning is technical reviews and inspections. A technical review requires substantial preparation on the part of the presenters. Documents must be published and distributed and presentation material organized and made into slides or overheads. Practice sessions are conducted by presenters with an audience of critics to prepare for the review.
The reviewers should read the material, attend the presentations, and write reports. On large projects with many reviews and walk-throughs involving many participants, a substantial number of labor hours can be consumed analyzing documents, attending meetings, and writing reports. For example, a system design review for one module or unit can require 150 labor hours. When overlooked, this labor can result in a very large error in resource and schedule estimation.
Many projects include risk assessment and risk management as a key part of the planning process and expect the plan to identify specific risk areas. The plan is expected to quantify both probability of failure and consequences of failure and to describe what will be done to contain development risk.
A. Behforooz and F. Hudson. Software engineering fundamentals. Ed. Oxford (adapted).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
The reviewers should read the material, attend the presentations, and write reports. On large projects with many reviews and walk-throughs involving many participants, a substantial number of labor hours can be consumed analyzing documents, attending meetings, and writing reports. For example, a system design review for one module or unit can require 150 labor hours. When overlooked, this labor can result in a very large error in resource and schedule estimation.
Many projects include risk assessment and risk management as a key part of the planning process and expect the plan to identify specific risk areas. The plan is expected to quantify both probability of failure and consequences of failure and to describe what will be done to contain development risk.
A. Behforooz and F. Hudson. Software engineering fundamentals. Ed. Oxford (adapted).
Based on the text above, judge the following items.
During the practice sessions the critic’s role is to elaborate on the items to be reviewed.
Wrong- Who "elaborates on the review" is the presenters,acocuntable for conducting said presentations. The audience of critics prepare for the review.
errado- quem elabora são os apresentadores. Os críticos fazem a resenha se baseando na elaboração. Wrong- Who "elaborates on the review" is the presenters,acocuntable for conducting said presentations. The audience of critics prepare for the review.
errado- quem elabora são os apresentadores. Os críticos fazem a resenha se baseando na elaboração. to elaborate on --> to develop something in more detail;to expand on or to enlarge.
Desse modo, nada se fala, no texto, a respeito de detalhar itens na sessão de críticas. Wrong- Who "elaborates on the review" is the presenters,acocuntable for conducting said presentations. The audience of critics prepare for the review.
errado- quem elabora são os apresentadores. Os críticos fazem a resenha se baseando na elaboração.
errado- quem elabora são os apresentadores. Os críticos fazem a resenha se baseando na elaboração. Wrong- Who "elaborates on the review" is the presenters,acocuntable for conducting said presentations. The audience of critics prepare for the review.
errado- quem elabora são os apresentadores. Os críticos fazem a resenha se baseando na elaboração. to elaborate on --> to develop something in more detail;to expand on or to enlarge.
Desse modo, nada se fala, no texto, a respeito de detalhar itens na sessão de críticas. Wrong- Who "elaborates on the review" is the presenters,acocuntable for conducting said presentations. The audience of critics prepare for the review.
errado- quem elabora são os apresentadores. Os críticos fazem a resenha se baseando na elaboração.