Chapter 3 Theoretical Foundation of Critical Literacies and...

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q3953943 Inglês
Chapter 3
Theoretical Foundation of Critical Literacies and Global and Multicultural Education
    In this chapter, I invite the reader to a more in-depth discussion on critical literacies from global and multicultural perspectives by presenting important theoretical constructs of each field. I first provide a historical and theoretical review of global and multicultural education, followed by the literature review of critical literacies, including relevant definitions. Overall, this chapter serves as the literature review of the three areas. Through this review, I attempt to answer the question on why global and multicultural perspectives matter in the field of critical literacies.
Global Education
The notions of “global” and “multicultural” are different in their theoretical orientation. The former was developed in response to international issues, while the latter was developed in response to national minority struggles in the U.S. This difference of visions and orientations is important as it highlights the difference in scope: global education traditionally is concerned with educational dilemmas that are relevant across nations and continents. It, therefore, covers a broader spectrum of issues such as intercultural relations. Rapid globalization driven by the Internet and human migration highlighted the need for global education and propelled scholarly attention to such matters. Philosophically speaking, global education is based on recognizing core human rights and it pertains to the notion of moral universalism. Namely, it is based on the view that human beings are created equal.
Multicultural Education
    Research on multicultural education has flourished around the globe. In particular, in the U.S. historical context, it emerged with the American Civil Rights Movement. Unlike global education, multicultural education focuses more on national issues, specifically learning about cultures within the state. With its original purpose from the early 1960s and 1970s to address racism in schools and societies, early discussions on race and ethnicity focused on African Americans and were spearheaded by African American scholars. This type of ethnic studies has been the first phase in the development of multicultural education as a field. Since then, more multicultural theorists began to analyze the power issues underlying race and inequality, as well as other topics such as social class gaps and economic discrimination.
YOON, Bogum. Critical Literacies. Global and Multicultural Perspectives. New York: Springer, 2016, pp. 26-29. (Adapted).
We could define the idea of global and multicultural literacies respectively as
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Gabarito: A

Fundamento decisivo: O ponto decisivo era a ordem pedida em "respectively": global aparece ligado a "international issues" e multicultural a "national issues/within the state".

Tema central: distinção de escopo
Análise das alternativas
A
Certa
A alternativa A corresponde ao contraste direto do texto: global education é associada a "international issues" e multicultural education a "national issues" e "within the state". Por isso, o par "international issues; local issues" é o que melhor reproduz a oposição central.
B
Errada
Está errada porque "situated learning" não aparece no texto como definição de global education, e "ethnical issues" também não é a formulação usada para definir multicultural education. A alternativa introduz categorias que não são o eixo comparativo do excerto.
C
Errada
Está errada porque "philosophical approach" é genérico e não fixa o escopo de global education. Além disso, "equality" aparece no texto como base filosófica de global education, ligada ao moral universalism, e não como definição de multicultural education.
D
Errada
Está errada porque o texto menciona African Americans apenas no desenvolvimento histórico da multicultural education nos EUA, não como uma "African perspective". Também erra no segundo termo, porque "equality" está vinculada ao fundamento filosófico de global education, não ao par definidor de multicultural.
E
Errada
Está errada porque "civil rights" é o contexto histórico de emergência da multicultural education, não a definição de global education. Mesmo que "racial problems" dialogue com o desenvolvimento da multicultural education, a alternativa já falha no primeiro polo e confunde contexto histórico com definição conceitual.
Pegadinha da questão
A confusão real era trocar o eixo definidor de escopo por elementos históricos ou acessórios do texto e, além disso, ignorar o "respectively".
Dica para questões semelhantes
  • Quando o texto opõe dois conceitos, identifique primeiro o critério de contraste usado pelo autor antes de olhar palavras isoladas.
  • Se a pergunta trouxer "respectively", preserve rigorosamente a ordem dos termos comparados.

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo