Based on the ideas presented in the preceding text, as well ...
Cyber issues have become increasingly central in international affairs and the breadth of issues discussed under this rubric has grown, including questions of peace and conflict, the fight against cybercrime and controversies around internet governance. In this context, three issue characteristics have affected the practice of cyber diplomacy.
First, cybersecurity retains a strong technical undercurrent that not only poses a challenge to conventional diplomatic skills but also introduces a distinct temporal quality. Reflecting broader trends in digital connectivity, cybersecurity evolves at the speed of technology, contributing to the transient nature of diplomatic practices, the limits of which are "constantly being renegotiated". These conceptual ambiguities have imbued cyber governance with a distinct political dynamic, offering ample opportunity for varied policy solutions to find "rhetorical shelter".
Second, perceptions of the stakes involved are equally evolving, with initial concerns about cyber war and cyberterrorism being supplemented with a focus on attacks below the level of armed attack. Relatedly, dichotomies across cybercrime and international security are blurring as cybercriminals are enlisted in state-sponsored campaigns.
Third, cyber issues exhibit a cross-cutting nature that breaches institutional and epistemic boundaries, calling into action a swath of actors across the public-private divide and requiring coordination across knowledge domains, including technical, legal and policy knowledge.
Johann Ole Willers, Lars Gjesvik. Cybersecurity as an issue of international affairs.
In: Diplomacy in the age of expertise: the case of cyber diplomacy.
International Affairs, Oxford University Press, fev./2026.
Internet: <academic.oup.com> (adapted).
Based on the ideas presented in the preceding text, as well as on its linguistic aspects, judge the following item.
It is correct to conclude from the text that, when the authors state that the limits of diplomatic practices are 'constantly being renegotiated' (second sentence of the second paragraph), they mean that diplomatic boundaries are not fixed but are continually revised as political and technological conditions evolve.
Comentários
Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos
– Certo
cybersecurity evolves at the speed of technology, contributing to the transient nature of diplomatic practices, the limits of which are 'constantly being renegotiated'.”**
--------------------------
a segurança cibernética evolui na velocidade da tecnologia, contribuindo para a natureza transitória das práticas diplomáticas, cujos limites estão 'constantemente sendo renegociados'.”*
----------------
A sentença afirma que os autores querem dizer que os limites diplomáticos não são fixos, mas continuamente revisados conforme as condições políticas e tecnológicas evoluem. O texto liga diretamente a evolução tecnológica (velocidade da tecnologia) à natureza transitória da diplomacia, e afirma explicitamente que os limites estão “constantemente sendo renegociados”. Isso confirma a ideia de revisão contínua diante de mudanças tecnológicas (e, implicitamente, políticas, já que se trata de práticas diplomáticas).
Clique para visualizar este comentário
Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo