Calling the world’s languages "a brotherhood" (second para...
Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
SEDUC-AL
Prova:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - SEDUC-AL - Professor - Inglês |
Q4443012
Inglês
Texto associado
Evaluate the following item, which relates to the provided text and to new trends in English language teaching.
Dante, the Italian author, was sort of a linguistic Darwin.
He held a heretical theory. Europe’s languages, he thought, had
not been made in a single moment, in a biblical Babel, but had
evolved. With the care of a Victorian naturalist, he thus split
Europe’s languages into families by their words for "yes": those
who lived in southern France and said "oc" spoke a "Langue
d’oc".
He was spot-on. Four centuries later, a British judge and
polyglot called Sir William Jones arrived in Calcutta and was
struck by the similarities between Latin and Sanskrit words for
terms such as house (domus, dam) and god (deus, deva). Clearly
they had "sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no
longer exists". The world’s languages were not a Babel but a
brotherhood.
Proto, a new book by Laura Spinney, a journalist, offers a
biography of that brotherhood—or rather its parent. For Jones’s
"common source" now has a name: "Proto-Indo-European" (PIE).
It was first spoken by as little as a few dozen people around the
Black Sea then, roughly 5,000 years ago, spread with rapidity
"from Ireland to India". Today, its offshoots include Irish,
Hindi—and more or less everything in between. Almost half of
the world’s population speaks a descendant of it.
PIE is long dead, but traces of it remain caught, like
insects in amber, in modern languages, allowing academics to
bring it back to life. Scholars know, for example, its speakers
found visitors irritating: the PIE word "ghostis" gives English not
just "guest" but "ghost", and Latin its word for "host" but also
"enemy".
Internet: <https://www.economist.com>(Adapted)
Calling the world’s languages "a brotherhood" (second
paragraph) emphasizes the fact that they have similarities
and common traces, an idea that is reinforced by the use of
"its parent" in the third paragraph.