Questões de Concurso Público Prefeitura de Mondaí - SC 2026 para Professor Licenciado – Área III / Disciplina: Inglês - Edital nº 39
Foram encontradas 14 questões
"Those diagnosed in the past with Asperger's would now be identified as having Level 1 ASD."
In this context, the construction "would now be identified as having" is accurately interpreted as:
(__)The text presents articulation in speech and writing, attention to detail, rote memory, and systematic problem solving among frequently observed strengths.
(__)The text indicates that intense interests may retain a broad thematic continuity even when more specific interests change over time.
(__)Environmental hypersensitivity is presented as one of the two symptom dimensions on which ASD diagnosis is based.
(__)Anxiety and sensory sensitivity are discussed separately from the two diagnostic symptom dimensions identified in the text.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
Which interpretation preserves the specialized educational meanings of both expressions?
What is the principal discourse effect of this pattern?
Which inference accurately reconstructs the argument developed in this section?
The expression "Such individuals" performs which cohesive function?
Which interpretation is supported by the relationship between the main list and the note?
Which pair of meanings corresponds to their contextual use?
• They turned down the proposal. • They turned the proposal down. • They turned it down. • *They turned down it. • They looked after the student. • *They looked the student after.
Which analysis accounts for the contrast?
COLUMN I
1.Weak-form reduction. 2.Assimilation. 3.Elision. 4.Resyllabification/linking.
COLUMN II
(__)A segment changes some of its phonetic properties under the influence of a neighboring segment.
(__)A function word that has a full citation form is realized with reduced prominence and frequently with a centralized vowel in unstressed speech.
(__)A segment expected from the citation form is omitted in a phonologically favorable connected-speech environment.
(__)A consonantal segment at the edge of one word is perceptually associated with the following vowel-initial syllable in fluent speech.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
(__)In Only when did the participants receive the instructions they recognize the ambiguity, the inversion is correctly located because fronting only when requires subject−auxiliary inversion inside the dependent clause.
(__)In Not until the results were independently replicated did the committee revise its position, the fronted constituent licenses inversion because it has restrictive scope over the temporal relation expressed by the sentence.
(__)In Only after the second calibration had been completed did the technicians obtain stable readings, subject−auxiliary inversion occurs in the main clause rather than inside the subordinate clause introduced by after.
(__)A sentence beginning with Rarely may display subject−auxiliary inversion when the adverbial is fronted, as in Rarely have researchers encountered such consistent results.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
(__)In Despite the fact that the evidence was incomplete, the committee proceeded, despite functions as a preposition whose complement is the noun phrase headed by fact , while the that-clause is embedded within that noun phrase.
(__)In Because the evidence was incomplete and because of the evidence was incomplete , because and because of are syntactically interchangeable causal connectors, since both can directly introduce finite clauses.
(__)In Whereas the first proposal emphasizes access, the second emphasizes efficiency, whereas functions as a preposition because it establishes a contrastive relation between two propositions.
(__)The expressions in case and in case of belong to the same syntactic category: both directly introduce finite subordinate clauses expressing precaution or contingency.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
While still in use, the term Asperger's Syndrome does not appear in the most recent version...
Which grammatical analysis accounts for the structure and discourse relation of "While still in use"?
I. The emergency latch is unlockable from the inside with a single movement.
II. After the mechanism broke, the cabinet became unlockable: the door could no longer be secured.
The difference in meaning can be represented through alternative hierarchical structures of the same sequence of morphemes.
Which analysis corresponds to the two contexts?