Questões de Concurso
Comentadas sobre vocabulário | vocabulary em inglês
Foram encontradas 2.466 questões
Ano: 2012
Banca:
UNEMAT
Órgão:
CEPROMAT
Prova:
UNEMAT - 2012 - CEPROMAT - Analista de Tecnologia da Informação |
Q299166
Inglês
Relacione as palavras da primeira coluna com as da segunda:
Assinale a alternativa que indica a sequência correta.
Assinale a alternativa que indica a sequência correta.
Ano: 2012
Banca:
IBFC
Órgão:
INEP
Prova:
IBFC - 2012 - INEP - Pesquisador-Tecnologista em Informações e Avaliações Educacionais - Área III |
Q297297
Inglês
Read the following sentences I, II, III: I.
I sent a letter to the airline company complaining about the problems I had during the flight and they have promised to look into the matter.
II. Although that doctor hasn't won the Nobel Prize, I look up to him.
III. I promised her that I would look after her kids if she weren't able to do that.
It's correct to say that the meaning of each underline bold phrasal verb is respectively
I sent a letter to the airline company complaining about the problems I had during the flight and they have promised to look into the matter.
II. Although that doctor hasn't won the Nobel Prize, I look up to him.
III. I promised her that I would look after her kids if she weren't able to do that.
It's correct to say that the meaning of each underline bold phrasal verb is respectively
Ano: 2012
Banca:
IBFC
Órgão:
INEP
Prova:
IBFC - 2012 - INEP - Pesquisador-Tecnologista em Informações e Avaliações Educacionais - Área III |
Q297295
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text and answer questions 19), 20), 21), 22), 23) and 24).
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes
For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers. The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake. The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation. Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works. “Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year. While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoe...
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes
For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers. The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake. The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation. Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works. “Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year. While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoe...
In the passage “The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole" the meaning of the phrasal verb is
Ano: 2012
Banca:
IBFC
Órgão:
INEP
Prova:
IBFC - 2012 - INEP - Pesquisador-Tecnologista em Informações e Avaliações Educacionais - Área III |
Q297294
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text and answer questions 19), 20), 21), 22), 23) and 24).
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes
For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers. The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake. The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation. Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works. “Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year. While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoe...
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes
For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers. The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake. The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation. Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works. “Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year. While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoe...
The alternative that brings the best synonym to the bold underline idiom in the passage “Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010" is
Q291547
Inglês
n Text II, the idea expressed by the word in boldface type is described in
Q291543
Inglês
In Text I, the idea expressed by the word in boldface type is described in
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
DECEA
Prova:
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - DECEA - Controlador de Tráfego Aéreo Código |
Q277972
Inglês
Based on the meanings in Text II,
Ano: 2012
Banca:
ESAF
Órgão:
Receita Federal
Prova:
ESAF - 2012 - Receita Federal - Analista Tributário da Receita Federal - Prova 1 - Gabarito 1 |
Q264472
Inglês
In paragraph 3 line 8, the word "sorely" could best be replaced by
Ano: 2012
Banca:
ESAF
Órgão:
Receita Federal
Prova:
ESAF - 2012 - Receita Federal - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Federal - Prova 1 - Gabarito 1 |
Q264189
Inglês
In paragraph 2 line 3, the word "brokerages" refers to
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Transpetro
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Médico do Trabalho Júnior
|
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Contador Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Químico de Petróleo Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Naval |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Administrador Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Bibliotecário Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Infra-Estrutura |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Automação |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Segurança |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Profissional de Meio Ambiente Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Mecânica |
Q252459
Inglês
Texto associado
Safety Meeting Presentation
Today's meeting is really about you. I can stand
in front of you and talk about working safely and what
procedures to follow until I'm blue in the face. But until
you understand the need for working safely, until you
are willing to be responsible for your safety, it doesn't
mean a whole lot.
Some of you may be familiar with OSHA - the Occupational Safety & Health Administration. The sole purpose of this agency is to keep American workers safe. Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy, but if we work together, we can do it. Yet, complying with regulations is not the real reason for working safely. Our real motive is simple. We care about each and every one of you and will do what is necessary to prevent you from being injured.
However, keeping our workplace safe takes input from everyone. Management, supervisor, and all of you have to come together on this issue, or we're in trouble. For example, upper management has to approve the purchase of safe equipment. Supervisors, including myself, have to ensure that each of you knows how to use that equipment safely. Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained. If any one part of this chain fails, accidents are going to happen and people are going to get hurt.
Responsibility Number One - Recognize Hazards
At the core of your safety responsibilities lies the task of recognizing safety and health hazards. In order to do that, you must first understand what constitutes a hazard. Extreme hazards are often obvious. Our hopes are that you won't find too many of those around here.
There are, however, more subtle hazards that won't jump up and bite you. As a result of your safety training and meetings like these, some things may come to mind. For example, a machine may not be easy to lock out. Common practice may be to use a tag. This is a potential hazard and should be discussed. Maybe something can be changed to make it easier to use a lock. Other subtle hazards include such things as frayed electrical cords, a loose machine guard, a cluttered aisle, or maybe something that just doesn't look right.
Responsibility Number Two - Report Hazards
A big part of recognizing hazards is using your instincts. Nobody knows your job as well as you do, so we're counting on you to let us know about possible problems. Beyond recognizing hazards, you have to correct them or report them to someone who can. This too, is a judgement call. For example, if something spills in your work area you can probably clean it up yourself. However, if there is an unlabeled chemical container and you have no idea what it is, you should report it to your supervisor.
Additional Employee Responsibilities
Good housekeeping is a major part of keeping your work area safe. For example, you should take a few minutes each day to ensure that aisles, hallways, and stairways in your work area are not obstructed. If boxes, equipment, or anything else is left to pile up, you have a tripping hazard on your hands. Those obstructions could keep you from exiting the building quickly and safely should you face an emergency situation.
Also watch out for spills. These can lead to slips and falls. Flammable materials are another thing to be aware of. Make sure they are disposed of properly.
Keep Thinking. Even if you're doing your job safely and you are avoiding hazards, there are often even better ways to work safely. If you have ideas for improving the safety of your job or that of co-workers, share them.
Concluding Remarks
While nothing we do can completely eliminate the threat of an incident, we can work together to improve our odds. As I said, this must be a real team effort and I'm counting on input from all of you. Let's keep communicating and continue to improve safety.
Available at: <http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/www99/right/training/meeting/emplores.html>.Retrieved on: April 1st, 2012. Adapted.
Some of you may be familiar with OSHA - the Occupational Safety & Health Administration. The sole purpose of this agency is to keep American workers safe. Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy, but if we work together, we can do it. Yet, complying with regulations is not the real reason for working safely. Our real motive is simple. We care about each and every one of you and will do what is necessary to prevent you from being injured.
However, keeping our workplace safe takes input from everyone. Management, supervisor, and all of you have to come together on this issue, or we're in trouble. For example, upper management has to approve the purchase of safe equipment. Supervisors, including myself, have to ensure that each of you knows how to use that equipment safely. Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained. If any one part of this chain fails, accidents are going to happen and people are going to get hurt.
Responsibility Number One - Recognize Hazards
At the core of your safety responsibilities lies the task of recognizing safety and health hazards. In order to do that, you must first understand what constitutes a hazard. Extreme hazards are often obvious. Our hopes are that you won't find too many of those around here.
There are, however, more subtle hazards that won't jump up and bite you. As a result of your safety training and meetings like these, some things may come to mind. For example, a machine may not be easy to lock out. Common practice may be to use a tag. This is a potential hazard and should be discussed. Maybe something can be changed to make it easier to use a lock. Other subtle hazards include such things as frayed electrical cords, a loose machine guard, a cluttered aisle, or maybe something that just doesn't look right.
Responsibility Number Two - Report Hazards
A big part of recognizing hazards is using your instincts. Nobody knows your job as well as you do, so we're counting on you to let us know about possible problems. Beyond recognizing hazards, you have to correct them or report them to someone who can. This too, is a judgement call. For example, if something spills in your work area you can probably clean it up yourself. However, if there is an unlabeled chemical container and you have no idea what it is, you should report it to your supervisor.
Additional Employee Responsibilities
Good housekeeping is a major part of keeping your work area safe. For example, you should take a few minutes each day to ensure that aisles, hallways, and stairways in your work area are not obstructed. If boxes, equipment, or anything else is left to pile up, you have a tripping hazard on your hands. Those obstructions could keep you from exiting the building quickly and safely should you face an emergency situation.
Also watch out for spills. These can lead to slips and falls. Flammable materials are another thing to be aware of. Make sure they are disposed of properly.
Keep Thinking. Even if you're doing your job safely and you are avoiding hazards, there are often even better ways to work safely. If you have ideas for improving the safety of your job or that of co-workers, share them.
Concluding Remarks
While nothing we do can completely eliminate the threat of an incident, we can work together to improve our odds. As I said, this must be a real team effort and I'm counting on input from all of you. Let's keep communicating and continue to improve safety.
Available at: <http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/www99/right/training/meeting/emplores.html>.Retrieved on: April 1st, 2012. Adapted.
Based on the meanings in the text, it is clear that
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Transpetro
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Médico do Trabalho Júnior
|
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Contador Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Químico de Petróleo Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Naval |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Administrador Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Bibliotecário Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Infra-Estrutura |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Automação |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Segurança |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Profissional de Meio Ambiente Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Mecânica |
Q252455
Inglês
Texto associado
Safety Meeting Presentation
Today's meeting is really about you. I can stand
in front of you and talk about working safely and what
procedures to follow until I'm blue in the face. But until
you understand the need for working safely, until you
are willing to be responsible for your safety, it doesn't
mean a whole lot.
Some of you may be familiar with OSHA - the Occupational Safety & Health Administration. The sole purpose of this agency is to keep American workers safe. Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy, but if we work together, we can do it. Yet, complying with regulations is not the real reason for working safely. Our real motive is simple. We care about each and every one of you and will do what is necessary to prevent you from being injured.
However, keeping our workplace safe takes input from everyone. Management, supervisor, and all of you have to come together on this issue, or we're in trouble. For example, upper management has to approve the purchase of safe equipment. Supervisors, including myself, have to ensure that each of you knows how to use that equipment safely. Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained. If any one part of this chain fails, accidents are going to happen and people are going to get hurt.
Responsibility Number One - Recognize Hazards
At the core of your safety responsibilities lies the task of recognizing safety and health hazards. In order to do that, you must first understand what constitutes a hazard. Extreme hazards are often obvious. Our hopes are that you won't find too many of those around here.
There are, however, more subtle hazards that won't jump up and bite you. As a result of your safety training and meetings like these, some things may come to mind. For example, a machine may not be easy to lock out. Common practice may be to use a tag. This is a potential hazard and should be discussed. Maybe something can be changed to make it easier to use a lock. Other subtle hazards include such things as frayed electrical cords, a loose machine guard, a cluttered aisle, or maybe something that just doesn't look right.
Responsibility Number Two - Report Hazards
A big part of recognizing hazards is using your instincts. Nobody knows your job as well as you do, so we're counting on you to let us know about possible problems. Beyond recognizing hazards, you have to correct them or report them to someone who can. This too, is a judgement call. For example, if something spills in your work area you can probably clean it up yourself. However, if there is an unlabeled chemical container and you have no idea what it is, you should report it to your supervisor.
Additional Employee Responsibilities
Good housekeeping is a major part of keeping your work area safe. For example, you should take a few minutes each day to ensure that aisles, hallways, and stairways in your work area are not obstructed. If boxes, equipment, or anything else is left to pile up, you have a tripping hazard on your hands. Those obstructions could keep you from exiting the building quickly and safely should you face an emergency situation.
Also watch out for spills. These can lead to slips and falls. Flammable materials are another thing to be aware of. Make sure they are disposed of properly.
Keep Thinking. Even if you're doing your job safely and you are avoiding hazards, there are often even better ways to work safely. If you have ideas for improving the safety of your job or that of co-workers, share them.
Concluding Remarks
While nothing we do can completely eliminate the threat of an incident, we can work together to improve our odds. As I said, this must be a real team effort and I'm counting on input from all of you. Let's keep communicating and continue to improve safety.
Available at: <http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/www99/right/training/meeting/emplores.html>.Retrieved on: April 1st, 2012. Adapted.
Some of you may be familiar with OSHA - the Occupational Safety & Health Administration. The sole purpose of this agency is to keep American workers safe. Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy, but if we work together, we can do it. Yet, complying with regulations is not the real reason for working safely. Our real motive is simple. We care about each and every one of you and will do what is necessary to prevent you from being injured.
However, keeping our workplace safe takes input from everyone. Management, supervisor, and all of you have to come together on this issue, or we're in trouble. For example, upper management has to approve the purchase of safe equipment. Supervisors, including myself, have to ensure that each of you knows how to use that equipment safely. Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained. If any one part of this chain fails, accidents are going to happen and people are going to get hurt.
Responsibility Number One - Recognize Hazards
At the core of your safety responsibilities lies the task of recognizing safety and health hazards. In order to do that, you must first understand what constitutes a hazard. Extreme hazards are often obvious. Our hopes are that you won't find too many of those around here.
There are, however, more subtle hazards that won't jump up and bite you. As a result of your safety training and meetings like these, some things may come to mind. For example, a machine may not be easy to lock out. Common practice may be to use a tag. This is a potential hazard and should be discussed. Maybe something can be changed to make it easier to use a lock. Other subtle hazards include such things as frayed electrical cords, a loose machine guard, a cluttered aisle, or maybe something that just doesn't look right.
Responsibility Number Two - Report Hazards
A big part of recognizing hazards is using your instincts. Nobody knows your job as well as you do, so we're counting on you to let us know about possible problems. Beyond recognizing hazards, you have to correct them or report them to someone who can. This too, is a judgement call. For example, if something spills in your work area you can probably clean it up yourself. However, if there is an unlabeled chemical container and you have no idea what it is, you should report it to your supervisor.
Additional Employee Responsibilities
Good housekeeping is a major part of keeping your work area safe. For example, you should take a few minutes each day to ensure that aisles, hallways, and stairways in your work area are not obstructed. If boxes, equipment, or anything else is left to pile up, you have a tripping hazard on your hands. Those obstructions could keep you from exiting the building quickly and safely should you face an emergency situation.
Also watch out for spills. These can lead to slips and falls. Flammable materials are another thing to be aware of. Make sure they are disposed of properly.
Keep Thinking. Even if you're doing your job safely and you are avoiding hazards, there are often even better ways to work safely. If you have ideas for improving the safety of your job or that of co-workers, share them.
Concluding Remarks
While nothing we do can completely eliminate the threat of an incident, we can work together to improve our odds. As I said, this must be a real team effort and I'm counting on input from all of you. Let's keep communicating and continue to improve safety.
Available at: <http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/www99/right/training/meeting/emplores.html>.Retrieved on: April 1st, 2012. Adapted.
The expressions “Complying with" and “follow through" in the fragments “Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy," (lines 10-11) and “Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained." (lines 23-24) may, respectively, be substituted, without change in meaning, by
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Transpetro
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Médico do Trabalho Júnior
|
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Contador Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Químico de Petróleo Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Naval |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Administrador Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Bibliotecário Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Infra-Estrutura |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Automação |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Elétrica |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Segurança |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Profissional de Meio Ambiente Júnior |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Transpetro - Engenheiro Júnior - Mecânica |
Q252453
Inglês
Texto associado
Safety Meeting Presentation
Today's meeting is really about you. I can stand
in front of you and talk about working safely and what
procedures to follow until I'm blue in the face. But until
you understand the need for working safely, until you
are willing to be responsible for your safety, it doesn't
mean a whole lot.
Some of you may be familiar with OSHA - the Occupational Safety & Health Administration. The sole purpose of this agency is to keep American workers safe. Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy, but if we work together, we can do it. Yet, complying with regulations is not the real reason for working safely. Our real motive is simple. We care about each and every one of you and will do what is necessary to prevent you from being injured.
However, keeping our workplace safe takes input from everyone. Management, supervisor, and all of you have to come together on this issue, or we're in trouble. For example, upper management has to approve the purchase of safe equipment. Supervisors, including myself, have to ensure that each of you knows how to use that equipment safely. Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained. If any one part of this chain fails, accidents are going to happen and people are going to get hurt.
Responsibility Number One - Recognize Hazards
At the core of your safety responsibilities lies the task of recognizing safety and health hazards. In order to do that, you must first understand what constitutes a hazard. Extreme hazards are often obvious. Our hopes are that you won't find too many of those around here.
There are, however, more subtle hazards that won't jump up and bite you. As a result of your safety training and meetings like these, some things may come to mind. For example, a machine may not be easy to lock out. Common practice may be to use a tag. This is a potential hazard and should be discussed. Maybe something can be changed to make it easier to use a lock. Other subtle hazards include such things as frayed electrical cords, a loose machine guard, a cluttered aisle, or maybe something that just doesn't look right.
Responsibility Number Two - Report Hazards
A big part of recognizing hazards is using your instincts. Nobody knows your job as well as you do, so we're counting on you to let us know about possible problems. Beyond recognizing hazards, you have to correct them or report them to someone who can. This too, is a judgement call. For example, if something spills in your work area you can probably clean it up yourself. However, if there is an unlabeled chemical container and you have no idea what it is, you should report it to your supervisor.
Additional Employee Responsibilities
Good housekeeping is a major part of keeping your work area safe. For example, you should take a few minutes each day to ensure that aisles, hallways, and stairways in your work area are not obstructed. If boxes, equipment, or anything else is left to pile up, you have a tripping hazard on your hands. Those obstructions could keep you from exiting the building quickly and safely should you face an emergency situation.
Also watch out for spills. These can lead to slips and falls. Flammable materials are another thing to be aware of. Make sure they are disposed of properly.
Keep Thinking. Even if you're doing your job safely and you are avoiding hazards, there are often even better ways to work safely. If you have ideas for improving the safety of your job or that of co-workers, share them.
Concluding Remarks
While nothing we do can completely eliminate the threat of an incident, we can work together to improve our odds. As I said, this must be a real team effort and I'm counting on input from all of you. Let's keep communicating and continue to improve safety.
Available at: <http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/www99/right/training/meeting/emplores.html>.Retrieved on: April 1st, 2012. Adapted.
Some of you may be familiar with OSHA - the Occupational Safety & Health Administration. The sole purpose of this agency is to keep American workers safe. Complying with OSHA regulations isn't always easy, but if we work together, we can do it. Yet, complying with regulations is not the real reason for working safely. Our real motive is simple. We care about each and every one of you and will do what is necessary to prevent you from being injured.
However, keeping our workplace safe takes input from everyone. Management, supervisor, and all of you have to come together on this issue, or we're in trouble. For example, upper management has to approve the purchase of safe equipment. Supervisors, including myself, have to ensure that each of you knows how to use that equipment safely. Then it's up to you to follow through the task and use the equipment as you were trained. If any one part of this chain fails, accidents are going to happen and people are going to get hurt.
Responsibility Number One - Recognize Hazards
At the core of your safety responsibilities lies the task of recognizing safety and health hazards. In order to do that, you must first understand what constitutes a hazard. Extreme hazards are often obvious. Our hopes are that you won't find too many of those around here.
There are, however, more subtle hazards that won't jump up and bite you. As a result of your safety training and meetings like these, some things may come to mind. For example, a machine may not be easy to lock out. Common practice may be to use a tag. This is a potential hazard and should be discussed. Maybe something can be changed to make it easier to use a lock. Other subtle hazards include such things as frayed electrical cords, a loose machine guard, a cluttered aisle, or maybe something that just doesn't look right.
Responsibility Number Two - Report Hazards
A big part of recognizing hazards is using your instincts. Nobody knows your job as well as you do, so we're counting on you to let us know about possible problems. Beyond recognizing hazards, you have to correct them or report them to someone who can. This too, is a judgement call. For example, if something spills in your work area you can probably clean it up yourself. However, if there is an unlabeled chemical container and you have no idea what it is, you should report it to your supervisor.
Additional Employee Responsibilities
Good housekeeping is a major part of keeping your work area safe. For example, you should take a few minutes each day to ensure that aisles, hallways, and stairways in your work area are not obstructed. If boxes, equipment, or anything else is left to pile up, you have a tripping hazard on your hands. Those obstructions could keep you from exiting the building quickly and safely should you face an emergency situation.
Also watch out for spills. These can lead to slips and falls. Flammable materials are another thing to be aware of. Make sure they are disposed of properly.
Keep Thinking. Even if you're doing your job safely and you are avoiding hazards, there are often even better ways to work safely. If you have ideas for improving the safety of your job or that of co-workers, share them.
Concluding Remarks
While nothing we do can completely eliminate the threat of an incident, we can work together to improve our odds. As I said, this must be a real team effort and I'm counting on input from all of you. Let's keep communicating and continue to improve safety.
Available at: <http://www.ncsu.edu/ehs/www99/right/training/meeting/emplores.html>.Retrieved on: April 1st, 2012. Adapted.
'Until I'm blue in the face' in the fragment “I can stand in front of you and talk about working safely and what procedures to follow until I'm blue in the face." (lines 1-3) is substituted, without change in meaning, by 'until I
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro Agrônomo Júnior-2012
|
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Engenharia de Software-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Nível Superior - Todos os Cargos-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Processos de Negócios-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Produção Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Petróleo Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Eletrônica-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Mecânica-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Elétrica-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro Civil Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Processamento Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Inspeção-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Profissional de Comunicação Social Júnior - Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Médico do Trabalho Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Advogado Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Psicólogo Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Geólogo Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Geofísico Júnior - Física-2012 |
Q244264
Inglês
In Text I, the expression “turn down” in “I couldn’t turn down the great starting salary and a chance to live in New Orleans” (lines 12-14) could be replaced, without change in meaning, by
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Provas:
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro Agrônomo Júnior-2012
|
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Engenharia de Software-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Nível Superior - Todos os Cargos-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Analista de Sistemas Júnior - Processos de Negócios-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Produção Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Petróleo Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Eletrônica-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Mecânica-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Elétrica-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro Civil Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Processamento Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Engenheiro de Equipamento Júnior - Inspeção-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Profissional de Comunicação Social Júnior - Relações Públicas |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Médico do Trabalho Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Advogado Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Psicólogo Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Geólogo Júnior-2012 |
CESGRANRIO - 2012 - Petrobras - Geofísico Júnior - Física-2012 |
Q244262
Inglês
Based on the meanings of the words in Text I,
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
CESPE - 2012 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - 2ª Etapa |
Q237440
Inglês
In line 5, “at point-blank range” means
Ano: 2012
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
CESPE - 2012 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - 2ª Etapa |
Q237432
Inglês
Regarding the text, judge if the items below are right (C) or wrong (E).
The fragment “quicken my sympathies for my brethren in bonds” (L.28) means that the narrator is fast when it comes to forging emotional and spiritual bonds with his own real family through music.
The fragment “quicken my sympathies for my brethren in bonds” (L.28) means that the narrator is fast when it comes to forging emotional and spiritual bonds with his own real family through music.
Ano: 2011
Banca:
Makiyama
Órgão:
CPTM
Provas:
Makiyama - 2011 - CPTM - Engenheiro de Manutenção Júnior - Civil
|
Makiyama - 2011 - CPTM - Analista Econômico Financeiro Júnior |
Q2880766
Inglês
Texto associado
not valid statement found
The word ¯credit” (last paragraph) is:
Ano: 2011
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
INFRAERO
Prova:
FCC - 2011 - INFRAERO - Analista - Especialista em Navegação Aérea |
Q2878349
Inglês
The word or expression that fills in the KK [C] , in the text, is:
Ano: 2011
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
INFRAERO
Prova:
FCC - 2011 - INFRAERO - Analista - Especialista em Navegação Aérea |
Q2878342
Inglês
Texto associado
not valid statement found
O verbo que preenche corretamente a lacuna KK [B] do texto é:
Ano: 2011
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
INFRAERO
Prova:
FCC - 2011 - INFRAERO - Analista - Especialista em Navegação Aérea |
Q2878335
Inglês
Texto associado
Instruções: A questão refere-se ao texto abaixo.
Aerospace CEOs Discuss Joint Approach to Environment, Air Traffic Management, and Other Key Issues
PARIS, June 21, 2011 − Industry leaders from the Aerospace and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) and the Aerospace Industries Association of America (AIA) reaffirmed their commitment to cooperate on a wide variety of issues during an annual meeting at the 2011 Paris Airshow.
“Aircraft manufacturers are very serious about reducing aviation’s environmental impacts,” Jim Albaugh, Chairman of the Board of Governors of AIA and President and Chief Executive Officer, Boeing Commercial Airplanes said. “We’ve made remarkable progress on sustainable aviation biofuels and we’re working with regulators on a first-ever CO2 efficiency standard for new production aircraft.”
AIA and ASD vowed to support ICAO’s efforts towards reducing civil aviation CO2 emissions 50 percent compared to 2005 levels by the year 2050. They affirmed the primacy of such global approaches vs. regional or national market based measures. In support of ongoing collaboration with the global stakeholder community (airlines, airports, and air navigation service providers), both American and European manufacturers agreed to ensure understanding among regulators of how critical CO2 reduction will be.
Commercially viable, drop-in biofuels will KK [A] a large role in CO2 reduction and both groups are working towards that goal with their respective members. “To develop the use of biofuels in aviation, our industry and public authorities need to work hand in hand,” Domingo Urena-Raso, President of ASD and CEO of Airbus Military declared. “Incentives should be granted to scale up production, infrastructures and programmes, and to encourage the use of biofuels by airlines. We also need to increase our investment in research and development in this field,” he added.
Another issue discussed during the CEO Dialogue was air traffic management (ATM) interoperability and modernization. Participants in the meeting agreed that greater efforts and resources from governments would greatly contribute to the achievement of these goals and would yield considerable environmental, economic and efficiency benefits.
(Adapted from: http://thesantosrepublic.com/2011/06/aerospace-ceos-discuss-joint-approach-to-environment-air-traffic-management and-other-key-issues/)
No texto, both groups refere-se a
Conheça nossos planos