Questões de Concurso Comentadas sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 19.378 questões
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927845
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
Although conceived by a few local intellectuals and
elite members, Dutch culture exerted an appeal over
the rest of the country because the latter saw
themselves reflected by those artistic expressions.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927844
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
The text admits that Dutch culture, understood as
“collective ways of seeing themselves, and the world
beyond”, in lines 5 and 6, was a conscious invention.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927843
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
In line 9, the expression “propertied nation” refers to
the sovereignty of the Dutch nation.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927842
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
The feeling that Dutch of all social conditions were
part of a common group, whose experience was
expressed by a common culture, was compromised by
the participation in war and by the burden of taxes
imposed by the Dutch government.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927841
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
The text argues that the artistic expressions associated
with Dutch culture would have been a transient
phenomenon had it not been embraced by the non-elite
Dutch people.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927840
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
In line 34, the word “allegiance” could be replaced
with loyalty without changing the meaning of the
sentence.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927839
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
Dutch paintings depicting noble and common people
alongside in the winter reflected the consciously
invented vision of how the possessing classes wished
life in the Netherlands to be.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
IADES
Órgão:
Instituto Rio Branco
Prova:
IADES - 2022 - Instituto Rio Branco - Diplomata - Tarde |
Q1927838
Inglês
Considering the ideas and the vocabulary presented in the text, mark the following items as right (C) or wrong (E).
In line 21, the word “fancy” could be replaced with
whim without changing the meaning of the sentence.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TJ-DFT
Provas:
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Segurança da Informação
|
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Suporte em Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Sistemas |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Dados |
Q1924882
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer
It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking
machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to
closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals.
People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are
like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is
deeply flawed.
A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain
constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores
information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t
store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant
construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the
same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at
different times.
Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A
computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to
recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow
petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand
that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A
dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet
from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is
food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine.
In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by
their function, not just their physical form. Some scientists
believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc
category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains
work.
Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an
empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of
systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs,
a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of
hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated,
continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and
fight illness.[…]
If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it
must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex
collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue
operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check.
Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some
engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body
to provide this necessary ingredient.
For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor.
Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in
simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an
explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge.
(Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on
February 9th, 2022)
The passage in which the verb phrase indicates a necessity is:
Ano: 2022
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TJ-DFT
Provas:
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Segurança da Informação
|
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Suporte em Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Sistemas |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Dados |
Q1924881
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer
It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking
machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to
closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals.
People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are
like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is
deeply flawed.
A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain
constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores
information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t
store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant
construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the
same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at
different times.
Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A
computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to
recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow
petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand
that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A
dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet
from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is
food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine.
In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by
their function, not just their physical form. Some scientists
believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc
category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains
work.
Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an
empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of
systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs,
a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of
hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated,
continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and
fight illness.[…]
If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it
must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex
collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue
operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check.
Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some
engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body
to provide this necessary ingredient.
For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor.
Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in
simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an
explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge.
(Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on
February 9th, 2022)
“Whereas” in “A computer is built from static parts, whereas your
brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn” introduces
a(n):
Ano: 2022
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TJ-DFT
Provas:
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Segurança da Informação
|
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Suporte em Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Sistemas |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Dados |
Q1924880
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer
It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking
machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to
closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals.
People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are
like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is
deeply flawed.
A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain
constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores
information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t
store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant
construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the
same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at
different times.
Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A
computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to
recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow
petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand
that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A
dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet
from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is
food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine.
In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by
their function, not just their physical form. Some scientists
believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc
category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains
work.
Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an
empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of
systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs,
a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of
hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated,
continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and
fight illness.[…]
If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it
must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex
collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue
operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check.
Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some
engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body
to provide this necessary ingredient.
For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor.
Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in
simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an
explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge.
(Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on
February 9th, 2022)
According to the author, explaining the brain as a computer is:
Ano: 2022
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TJ-DFT
Provas:
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Segurança da Informação
|
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Suporte em Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Sistemas |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Dados |
Q1924879
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer
It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking
machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to
closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals.
People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are
like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is
deeply flawed.
A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain
constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores
information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t
store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant
construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the
same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at
different times.
Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A
computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to
recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow
petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand
that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A
dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet
from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is
food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine.
In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by
their function, not just their physical form. Some scientists
believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc
category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains
work.
Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an
empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of
systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs,
a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of
hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated,
continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and
fight illness.[…]
If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it
must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex
collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue
operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check.
Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some
engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body
to provide this necessary ingredient.
For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor.
Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in
simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an
explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge.
(Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on
February 9th, 2022)
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or
FALSE (F).
( ) Unlike a computer, it is hard for our brain to classify objects according to a specific purpose.
( ) The author rules out the possibility that computers may emulate the human brain someday.
( ) The brain adapts as one both matures and becomes more knowledgeable.
The statements are, respectively:
( ) Unlike a computer, it is hard for our brain to classify objects according to a specific purpose.
( ) The author rules out the possibility that computers may emulate the human brain someday.
( ) The brain adapts as one both matures and becomes more knowledgeable.
The statements are, respectively:
Ano: 2022
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TJ-DFT
Provas:
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Segurança da Informação
|
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Suporte em Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Sistemas |
FGV - 2022 - TJ-DFT - Analista Judiciário - Análise de Dados |
Q1924878
Inglês
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer
It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking
machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to
closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals.
People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are
like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is
deeply flawed.
A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain
constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores
information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t
store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant
construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the
same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at
different times.
Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A
computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to
recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow
petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand
that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A
dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet
from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is
food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine.
In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by
their function, not just their physical form. Some scientists
believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc
category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains
work.
Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an
empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of
systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs,
a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of
hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated,
continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and
fight illness.[…]
If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it
must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex
collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue
operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check.
Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some
engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body
to provide this necessary ingredient.
For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor.
Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in
simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an
explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge.
(Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on
February 9th, 2022)
The title of the text implies that the author will:
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918298
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
There were 61 deaths registered this week.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918297
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
Dengue epidemics started to be monitored in the early 90s.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918296
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
Tuesday (line 5) is a day of the week and it is the day after
Friday.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918295
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
Arboviruses is the name of other diseases caused by
Aedes aegypti mosquito.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918294
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
The government is not taking any precautions to combat
the dengue mosquito.
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918292
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
There are examples of the present simple and present
perfect in the following sentence: “The bulletin also
informs that 365 municipalities have reported cases, of
which 287 had confirmed cases” (lines from 24 to 26).
Ano: 2022
Banca:
Quadrix
Órgão:
CRA-PR
Provas:
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Administrador I
|
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Advogado I |
Quadrix - 2022 - CRA-PR - Analista Sistemas I |
Q1918291
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for the items from.
Judge the items from.
It would be grammatically correct and it would not change the meaning of the sentence if the preposition “above” was replaced by the preposition below in the sentence: The numbers of the weekly dengue bulletin, released today, reveal that probable and confirmed cases are below expectations for the epidemiological period.
It would be grammatically correct and it would not change the meaning of the sentence if the preposition “above” was replaced by the preposition below in the sentence: The numbers of the weekly dengue bulletin, released today, reveal that probable and confirmed cases are below expectations for the epidemiological period.
Conheça nossos planos