Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 26.122 questões
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790625
Inglês
Assinale a alternativa em que a preposição responde
adequadamente às restrições lexicais do verbo:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790624
Inglês
Considere a frase: The teacher’s mentors’ feedback
was incorporated into the final proposal. A construção
indica:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790623
Inglês
No contexto de um relatório acadêmico sobre evasão
escolar, o enunciado Researchers are still trying to pin
down the variables that intensify dropout rates emprega
pin down com o sentido de:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790622
Inglês
Ao analisar a frase By next semester, the school will
have been implementing the new curriculum for two
years, o professor deve reconhecer que o tempo verbal
expressa:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790621
Inglês
Em um texto regulatório, a sentença Teachers must
report any incident within 24 hours expressa:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790620
Inglês
Leia o trecho:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790619
Inglês
Um texto produzido por uma ONG internacional
combina: (1) dados estatísticos, (2) depoimentos de
comunidades vulneráveis, (3) infográficos interativos e
(4) recomendações políticas dirigidas a governos. A
classificação adequada, considerando função social e
composição discursiva, é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790616
Inglês
Considerando que a BNCC concebe o inglês como
prática de linguagem atravessada por
multiletramentos, assinale a alternativa que melhor
traduz essa concepção, entendendo-a como
articulação entre repertórios culturais, modos de
significação e participação social.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790615
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
In the third paragraph, the author suggests that AI
invites us to confront, with uncomfortable clarity, the
parts of ourselves we outsource. Considering the
metaphorical structure and the argumentative
movement of the text as a whole, the most accurate
interpretation is that this statement:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790614
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
From a global reading of the text, one may infer that the
author views the human–AI relationship as:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790613
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
Which interpretation most closely aligns with the
central argument of the final paragraph?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790612
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
In the third paragraph, the author states that AI mirrors
human beings. In context, this metaphor implies that:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790611
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
Considering the author’s portrayal of AI as a force that
subtly rearranges human habits, choose the option that
best captures the paradox suggested in the second
paragraph regarding autonomy and decision-making.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790092
Inglês
An Adverb Phrase (AdvP) consists of an adverb acting as
the head, potentially accompanied by pre-modifiers and
post-modifiers that qualify or intensify its meaning within
the clause. Select the option where the underlined
section constitutes a complete Adverb Phrase functioning
as a pre-modifier of an adjective.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790091
Inglês
Genre analysis in English for Specific Purposes (ESP)
involves understanding the communicative purposes,
schematic structures, and linguistic features specific to
discourse communities. Regarding the characteristics of
the "Academic Abstract" genre, mark T for true and F for
false:
(__) An academic abstract typically follows the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) in a condensed form to provide a comprehensive overview of the study.
(__) The primary communicative purpose of an abstract is to persuade the reader to buy the product described in the text, using informal language and slang.
(__) Linguistic features of abstracts often include the use of the present perfect tense to refer to past research (Gap) and the simple past to describe the specific methods used in the current study.
(__) Abstracts are characterized by a high lexical density and nominalization, allowing for the packing of complex information into a limited word count.
After analysis, select the alternative that presents the correct sequence of the items above, from top to bottom:
(__) An academic abstract typically follows the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) in a condensed form to provide a comprehensive overview of the study.
(__) The primary communicative purpose of an abstract is to persuade the reader to buy the product described in the text, using informal language and slang.
(__) Linguistic features of abstracts often include the use of the present perfect tense to refer to past research (Gap) and the simple past to describe the specific methods used in the current study.
(__) Abstracts are characterized by a high lexical density and nominalization, allowing for the packing of complex information into a limited word count.
After analysis, select the alternative that presents the correct sequence of the items above, from top to bottom:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790090
Inglês
In the context of descriptive writing, the "Royal Order of
Adjectives" dictates the cumulative sequence of multiple
adjectives modifying a single head noun to ensure
naturalness and cohesion. Considering a sentence that
describes a specific artifact found in a museum, choose
the alternative that correctly orders the adjectives
according to the standard grammatical hierarchy
(Opinion-Size-Age-Shape-Color-Origin-Material).
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790089
Inglês
The Noun Phrase (NP) can be expanded through
pre-modification and post-modification, allowing for the
packing of dense information characteristic of academic
registers. Choose the option that correctly identifies the
Head Noun and its Post-modifier in the sentence: "The
proposal submitted by the committee was rejected."
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790088
Inglês
Cohesion refers to the linguistic elements that link
sentences together, while coherence relates to the
underlying logical connection of ideas. Analyze the
following excerpt: "John arrived late. This annoyed his
boss. He had missed the meeting." and identify the
specific cohesive devices employed.
I. "This" is an example of reference, specifically referring back to the entire preceding clause ("John arrived late").
II. "He" is an example of anaphora, referring back to the antecedent "John".
III. The connection between the sentences relies on lexical repetition rather than pronominal reference.
It is correct what is stated
I. "This" is an example of reference, specifically referring back to the entire preceding clause ("John arrived late").
II. "He" is an example of anaphora, referring back to the antecedent "John".
III. The connection between the sentences relies on lexical repetition rather than pronominal reference.
It is correct what is stated
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790087
Inglês
Derivational morphology allows for the creation of new
lexemes through affixes, often altering the grammatical
category or the semantic meaning of the base word.
Analyze the following morphological constructions
regarding their semantic and grammatical correctness:
I. The prefix "un-" in "undo" indicates reversal of an action, whereas in "unhappy" it indicates simple negation.
II. The suffix "-en" in words like "widen" and "shorten" functions to convert adjectives into verbs (causative meaning).
III. The prefix "mis-" in "misunderstand" adds a pejorative meaning or indicates an action done incorrectly.
It is correct what is stated
I. The prefix "un-" in "undo" indicates reversal of an action, whereas in "unhappy" it indicates simple negation.
II. The suffix "-en" in words like "widen" and "shorten" functions to convert adjectives into verbs (causative meaning).
III. The prefix "mis-" in "misunderstand" adds a pejorative meaning or indicates an action done incorrectly.
It is correct what is stated
Ano: 2025
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Craíbas - AL - Professor de Inglês |
Q3790086
Inglês
Adverbials can be placed in different positions within clause, but specific negative or restrictive adverbs trigger
mandatory subject-auxiliary inversion when placed at the
beginning of a sentence for emphatic purposes. Analyze
the following statements regarding the syntax of
adverbials:
I. "Seldom have I seen such a remarkable display of talent" is a grammatically correct example of inversion triggered by a negative adverb.
II. "Hardly had he arrived when the phone rang" demonstrates the correct use of inversion with a time-relationship adverbial.
III. "Little she knows about the surprise" is the correct emphatic form of the sentence "She knows little about the surprise".
It is correct what is stated
I. "Seldom have I seen such a remarkable display of talent" is a grammatically correct example of inversion triggered by a negative adverb.
II. "Hardly had he arrived when the phone rang" demonstrates the correct use of inversion with a time-relationship adverbial.
III. "Little she knows about the surprise" is the correct emphatic form of the sentence "She knows little about the surprise".
It is correct what is stated
Conheça nossos planos