Questões de Vestibular UFRGS 2023 para Vestibular 2024 - 2º Dia
Foram encontradas 11 questões


Adaptado de: O’DONOGHUE, C. The Rachel Incident. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 2023. p. 10-11.


Adaptado de: O’DONOGHUE, C. The Rachel Incident. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 2023. p. 10-11.
I - Substituição de like it’s (l. 05) por as if it were.
II - Substituição de he would say (l. 35) por he used to saying.
III- Substituição de it (l. 55) por them.
Quais resultariam gramaticalmente corretas, se aplicadas ao texto?


Adaptado de: O’DONOGHUE, C. The Rachel Incident. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 2023. p. 10-11.
I - O segmento Later, he would say that he was so inundated with new faces and names on his first shift (l. 35-37) adiciona humor ao texto pelo claro exagero empregado.
II - O segmento The first shift with Sabrina must have been fun – puzzling, considering how little craic Sabrina was generally understood to be (l. 40-42) confere um tom irônico à narrativa.
III- A comparação entre James e Poirot (l. 51-53) deixa implícita a admiração da narradora pelo colega.
Quais estão corretas?


Adaptado de: O’DONOGHUE, C. The Rachel Incident. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 2023. p. 10-11.
I - O pronome they (l. 21) refere-se a livros, como os escritos pelas atrizes Dawn French e Julie Walters.
II - O pronome they (l. 46) denota que James supõe que mais de uma pessoa precisou da loção que ele encontrou no banheiro.
III- As ocorrências do pronome it nas linhas 47, 48 e 51 têm o mesmo referente.
Quais estão corretas?


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.
( ) Mathematics is not an area detached from human experience. Nevertheless, the text fails to provide practical examples of how it contributes to improve aspects of our daily life.
( ) The word could (l. 62) may be replaced by must, without causing changes to grammar accuracy or to the original meaning of the sentence.
( ) Mathematics unequivocally relates to social processes, history, logic, and philosophy.
( ) The segment Research on deep mathematical issues should not be rejected or besmirched (l. 67-68) may be rephrased as One should not reject or besmirch research on deep mathematical issues, without causing changes to grammar accuracy or to the original meaning of the sentence.
The correct sequence of filling in the parentheses, from top to bottom, is


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.
I - By using the phrase philosophical conundrum of the highest order (l. 07-08), the author expresses ethical issues related to the relationship between mathematics and physics.
II - By stating that Mathematics is not some disembodied version of the ultimate truth (l. 18-19), the author states mathematics is fallible just like the other social sciences.
III- By using the term unequivocal (l. 42), the author states that the importance of mathematics is not under question regardless of whether people agree on its importance.
Which ones are correct according to the text?


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.
I - It surely matters to humanity as a whole, however it may not matter directly for everyday life.
II - Though it may not matter directly for everyday life, it surely matters to humanity as a whole.
III- Despite it may matter directly for everyday life, it surely matters to humanity as a whole.
If applied to the text, which ones would be correct and keep the original meaning?


Adapted from: STEWART, I. Why Beauty is Truth – The History of Symmetry. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books, 2007. p. 275-276.
I - Had Galois and his predecessors not been obsessed with understanding the conditions under which an equation can be solved by radicals, humanity’s discovery of group theory would have been greatly delayed.
II - Humanity’s discovery of group theory would have been greatly delayed had Galois and his predecessors not been obsessed with understanding the conditions under which an equation can be solved by radicals.
III- Had Galois and his predecessors been obsessed with understanding the conditions under which an equation can be solved by radicals, humanity´s discovery of group theory would not have been greatly delayed.
If applied to the text, which one(s) would be correct and keep the original meaning?