Questões de Vestibular Comentadas sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 2.761 questões
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FIMCA
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FIMCA - Vestibular de Medicina - Edital nº 01/ 2020 |
Q1790468
Inglês
Texto associado
Science Education in the United States of America
(Audrey B. Champagne.)
Science education in the United States of America is in the
midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented
because the movement is driven by national standards
developed with support from the federal government. The
standards for science education are redefining the character of
science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate
education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the
education in most countries of the world, education of
students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United
States is not the responsibility of the federal government but
is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all
students are expected to learn, the structural organization
of programs across all grades, the structural organization of
the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and
textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously
guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal
government to exercise control over matters that are the
responsibility of the states. The federal government's
involvement in education has been to identify matters of
national priority and to provide funds and other resources
to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance,
in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States
felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and
its national safety were threatened, science education was
identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the
federal government's initiatives was to encourage and
upgrade the science education of young people who would
become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived
by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a
response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the
science education of a relatively few students. The current
situation is quite different.
The federal government's underwriting of the
development of national standards for education has the
potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the
states to the federal government. This initiative, supported
by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the
concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the
poor quality of education across the nation and with the
effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world
economy. The goal of the standards movement from the
prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to
strengthen education so that the schools will produce
graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to
be productive in the workplace.
The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and
professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little
concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or
to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly
motivated and highly intelligent students survived science
courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences
develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers,
are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we
must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce
smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is
taught? While historically the answer to the question may
well have been survival, the national standards are based on
the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter
people.
(Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
Analyse the items usage in the text. Mark the one which is
a modifier.
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FIMCA
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FIMCA - Vestibular de Medicina - Edital nº 01/ 2020 |
Q1790467
Inglês
Texto associado
Science Education in the United States of America
(Audrey B. Champagne.)
Science education in the United States of America is in the
midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented
because the movement is driven by national standards
developed with support from the federal government. The
standards for science education are redefining the character of
science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate
education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the
education in most countries of the world, education of
students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United
States is not the responsibility of the federal government but
is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all
students are expected to learn, the structural organization
of programs across all grades, the structural organization of
the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and
textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously
guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal
government to exercise control over matters that are the
responsibility of the states. The federal government's
involvement in education has been to identify matters of
national priority and to provide funds and other resources
to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance,
in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States
felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and
its national safety were threatened, science education was
identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the
federal government's initiatives was to encourage and
upgrade the science education of young people who would
become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived
by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a
response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the
science education of a relatively few students. The current
situation is quite different.
The federal government's underwriting of the
development of national standards for education has the
potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the
states to the federal government. This initiative, supported
by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the
concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the
poor quality of education across the nation and with the
effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world
economy. The goal of the standards movement from the
prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to
strengthen education so that the schools will produce
graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to
be productive in the workplace.
The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and
professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little
concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or
to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly
motivated and highly intelligent students survived science
courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences
develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers,
are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we
must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce
smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is
taught? While historically the answer to the question may
well have been survival, the national standards are based on
the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter
people.
(Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
For Instance (L22) sets:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FIMCA
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FIMCA - Vestibular de Medicina - Edital nº 01/ 2020 |
Q1790466
Inglês
Texto associado
Science Education in the United States of America
(Audrey B. Champagne.)
Science education in the United States of America is in the
midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented
because the movement is driven by national standards
developed with support from the federal government. The
standards for science education are redefining the character of
science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate
education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the
education in most countries of the world, education of
students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United
States is not the responsibility of the federal government but
is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all
students are expected to learn, the structural organization
of programs across all grades, the structural organization of
the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and
textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously
guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal
government to exercise control over matters that are the
responsibility of the states. The federal government's
involvement in education has been to identify matters of
national priority and to provide funds and other resources
to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance,
in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States
felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and
its national safety were threatened, science education was
identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the
federal government's initiatives was to encourage and
upgrade the science education of young people who would
become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived
by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a
response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the
science education of a relatively few students. The current
situation is quite different.
The federal government's underwriting of the
development of national standards for education has the
potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the
states to the federal government. This initiative, supported
by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the
concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the
poor quality of education across the nation and with the
effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world
economy. The goal of the standards movement from the
prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to
strengthen education so that the schools will produce
graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to
be productive in the workplace.
The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and
professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little
concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or
to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly
motivated and highly intelligent students survived science
courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences
develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers,
are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we
must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce
smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is
taught? While historically the answer to the question may
well have been survival, the national standards are based on
the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter
people.
(Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
The goal of the standards movement is to:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FIMCA
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FIMCA - Vestibular de Medicina - Edital nº 01/ 2020 |
Q1790465
Inglês
Texto associado
Science Education in the United States of America
(Audrey B. Champagne.)
Science education in the United States of America is in the
midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented
because the movement is driven by national standards
developed with support from the federal government. The
standards for science education are redefining the character of
science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate
education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the
education in most countries of the world, education of
students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United
States is not the responsibility of the federal government but
is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all
students are expected to learn, the structural organization
of programs across all grades, the structural organization of
the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and
textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously
guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal
government to exercise control over matters that are the
responsibility of the states. The federal government's
involvement in education has been to identify matters of
national priority and to provide funds and other resources
to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance,
in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States
felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and
its national safety were threatened, science education was
identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the
federal government's initiatives was to encourage and
upgrade the science education of young people who would
become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived
by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a
response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the
science education of a relatively few students. The current
situation is quite different.
The federal government's underwriting of the
development of national standards for education has the
potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the
states to the federal government. This initiative, supported
by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the
concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the
poor quality of education across the nation and with the
effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world
economy. The goal of the standards movement from the
prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to
strengthen education so that the schools will produce
graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to
be productive in the workplace.
The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and
professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little
concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or
to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly
motivated and highly intelligent students survived science
courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences
develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers,
are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we
must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce
smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is
taught? While historically the answer to the question may
well have been survival, the national standards are based on
the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter
people.
(Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
“Meet” (L22) does NOT mean:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FIMCA
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FIMCA - Vestibular de Medicina - Edital nº 01/ 2020 |
Q1790464
Inglês
Texto associado
Science Education in the United States of America
(Audrey B. Champagne.)
Science education in the United States of America is in the
midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented
because the movement is driven by national standards
developed with support from the federal government. The
standards for science education are redefining the character of
science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate
education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the
education in most countries of the world, education of
students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United
States is not the responsibility of the federal government but
is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all
students are expected to learn, the structural organization
of programs across all grades, the structural organization of
the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and
textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously
guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal
government to exercise control over matters that are the
responsibility of the states. The federal government's
involvement in education has been to identify matters of
national priority and to provide funds and other resources
to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance,
in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States
felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and
its national safety were threatened, science education was
identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the
federal government's initiatives was to encourage and
upgrade the science education of young people who would
become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived
by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a
response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the
science education of a relatively few students. The current
situation is quite different.
The federal government's underwriting of the
development of national standards for education has the
potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the
states to the federal government. This initiative, supported
by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the
concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the
poor quality of education across the nation and with the
effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world
economy. The goal of the standards movement from the
prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to
strengthen education so that the schools will produce
graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to
be productive in the workplace.
The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and
professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little
concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or
to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly
motivated and highly intelligent students survived science
courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences
develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers,
are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we
must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce
smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is
taught? While historically the answer to the question may
well have been survival, the national standards are based on
the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter
people.
(Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
The text states that:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FIMCA
Prova:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FIMCA - Vestibular de Medicina - Edital nº 01/ 2020 |
Q1790463
Inglês
Texto associado
Science Education in the United States of America
(Audrey B. Champagne.)
Science education in the United States of America is in the
midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented
because the movement is driven by national standards
developed with support from the federal government. The
standards for science education are redefining the character of
science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate
education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the
education in most countries of the world, education of
students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United
States is not the responsibility of the federal government but
is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all
students are expected to learn, the structural organization
of programs across all grades, the structural organization of
the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and
textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously
guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal
government to exercise control over matters that are the
responsibility of the states. The federal government's
involvement in education has been to identify matters of
national priority and to provide funds and other resources
to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance,
in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States
felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and
its national safety were threatened, science education was
identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the
federal government's initiatives was to encourage and
upgrade the science education of young people who would
become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived
by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a
response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the
science education of a relatively few students. The current
situation is quite different.
The federal government's underwriting of the
development of national standards for education has the
potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the
states to the federal government. This initiative, supported
by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the
concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the
poor quality of education across the nation and with the
effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world
economy. The goal of the standards movement from the
prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to
strengthen education so that the schools will produce
graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to
be productive in the workplace.
The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and
professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little
concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or
to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly
motivated and highly intelligent students survived science
courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences
develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers,
are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we
must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce
smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is
taught? While historically the answer to the question may
well have been survival, the national standards are based on
the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter
people.
(Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
“Thus” (L52) introduces a/an:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FASEH
Provas:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina - Tipo 01
|
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina |
Q1785733
Inglês
Texto associado
Trump administration officials on healthcare
President Donald Trump’s main healthcare policy
initiative has been working to fulfill his campaign promise to
repeal and replace the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act(ACA), commonly known as Obamacare. He expressed his
support for the House and Senate bills that proposed
modifying parts of the ACA. The House passed its bill — the
American Health Care Act of 2017 — but members of the
Senate have been unable to agree on a final replacement
plan, leaving most of the provisions of the ACA in place.
Republicans did take one step towards changing the ACA by
eliminating the law's individual mandate, which took effect
in January 2019. In October 2017, the Trump administration
took actions to modify the ACA. Trump issued an executive
order directing members of his Cabinet to create rules that
would allow small businesses to collectively buy health
insurance through association health plans, expand shortterm health coverage, and expand the use of Health
Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). The order did not
make direct changes to existing health insurance rules;
instead, it directed agencies to consider new rules that
would be subject to a notice and comment period. Trump
said that he is still committed to passing a bill to repeal and
replace the ACA. Before signing the executive order on
October 12, 2017, Trump said, “Today is only the beginning.
In the coming months, we plan to take new measures to
provide our people with even more relief and more
freedom. (…) And we’re going to also pressure Congress very
strongly to finish the repeal and the replace of Obamacare
once and for all. We will have great healthcare in our
country..”.
(Available in: https://ballotpedia.org. Adapted.)
“Policy” (L1) means:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FASEH
Provas:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina - Tipo 01
|
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina |
Q1785732
Inglês
Texto associado
Trump administration officials on healthcare
President Donald Trump’s main healthcare policy
initiative has been working to fulfill his campaign promise to
repeal and replace the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act(ACA), commonly known as Obamacare. He expressed his
support for the House and Senate bills that proposed
modifying parts of the ACA. The House passed its bill — the
American Health Care Act of 2017 — but members of the
Senate have been unable to agree on a final replacement
plan, leaving most of the provisions of the ACA in place.
Republicans did take one step towards changing the ACA by
eliminating the law's individual mandate, which took effect
in January 2019. In October 2017, the Trump administration
took actions to modify the ACA. Trump issued an executive
order directing members of his Cabinet to create rules that
would allow small businesses to collectively buy health
insurance through association health plans, expand shortterm health coverage, and expand the use of Health
Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). The order did not
make direct changes to existing health insurance rules;
instead, it directed agencies to consider new rules that
would be subject to a notice and comment period. Trump
said that he is still committed to passing a bill to repeal and
replace the ACA. Before signing the executive order on
October 12, 2017, Trump said, “Today is only the beginning.
In the coming months, we plan to take new measures to
provide our people with even more relief and more
freedom. (…) And we’re going to also pressure Congress very
strongly to finish the repeal and the replace of Obamacare
once and for all. We will have great healthcare in our
country..”.
(Available in: https://ballotpedia.org. Adapted.)
Mark the gerund which is used as a noun:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FASEH
Provas:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina - Tipo 01
|
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina |
Q1785730
Inglês
Read the dialogue to answer.
Doctor: Have you ever fainted before? Patient: Yes, the last time you told me your fees.
(Available in:https://pages2cool.blogspot.com.)
Mark the item that does NOT match the dialogue:
Doctor: Have you ever fainted before? Patient: Yes, the last time you told me your fees.
(Available in:https://pages2cool.blogspot.com.)
Mark the item that does NOT match the dialogue:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
Instituto Consulplan
Órgão:
FASEH
Provas:
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina - Tipo 01
|
Instituto Consulplan - 2019 - FASEH - Vestibular de Medicina |
Q1785729
Inglês
Read the dialogue to answer.
Doctor: Please, take your seat. What is your problem? Patient: Hello Doctor, please, can you give me your certificate? Doctor: Why? Patient: I took two weeks leave in my office. They asked me to get a “Doctor Certificate”.
(Available in: https://pages2cool.blogspot.com.)
We learn from the dialogue that:
Doctor: Please, take your seat. What is your problem? Patient: Hello Doctor, please, can you give me your certificate? Doctor: Why? Patient: I took two weeks leave in my office. They asked me to get a “Doctor Certificate”.
(Available in: https://pages2cool.blogspot.com.)
We learn from the dialogue that:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
UDESC
Órgão:
UDESC
Prova:
UDESC - 2019 - UDESC - Vestibular - Biologia, Matemática, Língua Estrangeira e Língua Portuguesa |
Q1404651
Inglês
Available at: www.comics.azcentral.com. Accessed on March 28th, 2019.
Answer the question according to Text.
The expression: “I`m sold, Nate”, in the second picture, means:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
INEP
Órgão:
ENCCEJA
Prova:
INEP - 2019 - ENCCEJA - Exame - Linguagens e Ciências Humanas - Ensino Médio |
Q1401615
Inglês
Texto associado
Disabled Sports USA
Since 1967, Disabled Sports USA has focused on one goal: to improve the lives of wounded warriors by providing sports and recreation opportunities.
These sports opportunities transform the people we serve, highlighting the potential in each of us, embodied in our motto: “If I can do this, I can do anything!”.
Testimonials Read what our athletes and their families have to say about Disabled Sports USA.
“The hospital healed John's physical injury but Disabled Sports USA healed the family. Thank you for giving me my husband back!”
MOLLIE BORDERS — Wife Wounded Warrior John Borders
“Disabled Sports USA showed me that everything I did before was still possible to do after my injury.”
DEAN SCHWARTZ Wounded Warrior
Disponível em: www.disabledsportsusa.org. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2014 (adaptado).
Ao publicar depoimentos de pessoas
beneficiadas por suas ações, a organização
Disabled Sports USA objetiva
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399750
Inglês
Read the following cartoon in order to answer QUESTION .
From the cartoon, it is CORRECT to affirm:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399749
Inglês
Texto associado
Uncontacted Amazon tribe has been threatened by illegal
loggers
Remarkable close-up footage that appears to show an
uncontacted tribesman in the Amazon rainforest has been
released by an indigenous media group that wants to raise
awareness of the threat posed by illegal loggers, miners and
drug traffickers.
(...) The Awá have been described as the world’s most
threatened tribe by the NGO Survival International, which has
tracked killings by loggers, who surround and frequently
encroach upon the group’s territory.
Many of the community have been forced to abandon
the forest, but some remain in self-imposed isolation. Their
existence has been called into question by commercial interests
that want to move into the land, but the new footage has been
cited as proof that they remain in the territory.
It was recorded by a member of a neighbouring tribe,
the Guajajara, which is trying to defend one of the last pockets
of intact forest in Maranhão, a massively deforested state in the
north-east of Brazil.
―We hope this film produces something positive.
We
hope it makes an impact around the world to help protect our
people and our forest,‖ said Flay Guajajara, who shot the image
while out hunting and released it through the Mídia
Índia platform.
(...) Olimpio Guajajara, coordinator of the Guardians of
the Amazon, said three of the group’s members have been
murdered in this activity, which highlighted the need for more
long-term support. He said: ―We Guardians are defending our
people’s rights, defending the uncontacted Indians, and
defending nature for all of us. We need the land to be protected
for good."
Indigenous groups say successive governments have
failed to adequately recognise their territorial rights and their
role in protecting forests that are globally essential for carbon
sequestration and natural habitats.
According to Survival International, loggers have been
emboldened by the government and their camps can now be
seen on the edge of Awá land.
Director Stephen Corry said: ―This video is further
proof that the uncontacted Awá people really exist. And a
glance at a satellite photo shows just how much danger they’re
in. Loggers have already killed many of their relatives and
forced others out of the forest".
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/22/uncontactedtribe-video-amazon-rainforest-awa-people.
According to the NGO Survival International, it is INCORRECT
to affirm:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399748
Inglês
Texto associado
Uncontacted Amazon tribe has been threatened by illegal
loggers
Remarkable close-up footage that appears to show an
uncontacted tribesman in the Amazon rainforest has been
released by an indigenous media group that wants to raise
awareness of the threat posed by illegal loggers, miners and
drug traffickers.
(...) The Awá have been described as the world’s most
threatened tribe by the NGO Survival International, which has
tracked killings by loggers, who surround and frequently
encroach upon the group’s territory.
Many of the community have been forced to abandon
the forest, but some remain in self-imposed isolation. Their
existence has been called into question by commercial interests
that want to move into the land, but the new footage has been
cited as proof that they remain in the territory.
It was recorded by a member of a neighbouring tribe,
the Guajajara, which is trying to defend one of the last pockets
of intact forest in Maranhão, a massively deforested state in the
north-east of Brazil.
―We hope this film produces something positive.
We
hope it makes an impact around the world to help protect our
people and our forest,‖ said Flay Guajajara, who shot the image
while out hunting and released it through the Mídia
Índia platform.
(...) Olimpio Guajajara, coordinator of the Guardians of
the Amazon, said three of the group’s members have been
murdered in this activity, which highlighted the need for more
long-term support. He said: ―We Guardians are defending our
people’s rights, defending the uncontacted Indians, and
defending nature for all of us. We need the land to be protected
for good."
Indigenous groups say successive governments have
failed to adequately recognise their territorial rights and their
role in protecting forests that are globally essential for carbon
sequestration and natural habitats.
According to Survival International, loggers have been
emboldened by the government and their camps can now be
seen on the edge of Awá land.
Director Stephen Corry said: ―This video is further
proof that the uncontacted Awá people really exist. And a
glance at a satellite photo shows just how much danger they’re
in. Loggers have already killed many of their relatives and
forced others out of the forest".
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/22/uncontactedtribe-video-amazon-rainforest-awa-people.
In the first paragraph, the expression “to raise awareness”
means:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399747
Inglês
Texto associado
Uncontacted Amazon tribe has been threatened by illegal
loggers
Remarkable close-up footage that appears to show an
uncontacted tribesman in the Amazon rainforest has been
released by an indigenous media group that wants to raise
awareness of the threat posed by illegal loggers, miners and
drug traffickers.
(...) The Awá have been described as the world’s most
threatened tribe by the NGO Survival International, which has
tracked killings by loggers, who surround and frequently
encroach upon the group’s territory.
Many of the community have been forced to abandon
the forest, but some remain in self-imposed isolation. Their
existence has been called into question by commercial interests
that want to move into the land, but the new footage has been
cited as proof that they remain in the territory.
It was recorded by a member of a neighbouring tribe,
the Guajajara, which is trying to defend one of the last pockets
of intact forest in Maranhão, a massively deforested state in the
north-east of Brazil.
―We hope this film produces something positive.
We
hope it makes an impact around the world to help protect our
people and our forest,‖ said Flay Guajajara, who shot the image
while out hunting and released it through the Mídia
Índia platform.
(...) Olimpio Guajajara, coordinator of the Guardians of
the Amazon, said three of the group’s members have been
murdered in this activity, which highlighted the need for more
long-term support. He said: ―We Guardians are defending our
people’s rights, defending the uncontacted Indians, and
defending nature for all of us. We need the land to be protected
for good."
Indigenous groups say successive governments have
failed to adequately recognise their territorial rights and their
role in protecting forests that are globally essential for carbon
sequestration and natural habitats.
According to Survival International, loggers have been
emboldened by the government and their camps can now be
seen on the edge of Awá land.
Director Stephen Corry said: ―This video is further
proof that the uncontacted Awá people really exist. And a
glance at a satellite photo shows just how much danger they’re
in. Loggers have already killed many of their relatives and
forced others out of the forest".
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/22/uncontactedtribe-video-amazon-rainforest-awa-people.
In agreement with the text, it is CORRECT to affirm:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399746
Inglês
Read the following cartoon:
The cartoon infers the idea:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399745
Inglês
Texto associado
Missing Dentures Found Stuck in Man's Throat 8 Days
After Surgery
Here’s why it’s best to remove false teeth before
surgery: You just might swallow them.
A medical journal is reporting the case of a 72-
year-old British man whose partial dentures apparently
got stuck in his throat during surgery and weren’t
discovered for eight days.
The man went to the emergency room because he
was having a hard time swallowing and was coughing up
blood. Doctors ordered a chest X-ray, diagnosed him with
what they wrongly thought was pneumonia and sent him
home with antibiotics and steroids. It took another
hospital visit before another X-ray revealed the problem:
His dentures — a metal roof plate and three false teeth —
lodged at the top of his throat.
The man thought his dentures were lost while he
was in the hospital for minor surgery.
How it happened isn’t exactly clear, but a halfdozen previous cases have been documented of dentures
going astray as surgical patients were put to sleep.
Placing a tube in a patient’s airway can push
things where they don’t belong, said Dr. Mary Dale
Peterson, an anesthesiologist at Driscoll Children’s
Hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas.
Besides dentures, retainers, loose teeth and
tongue piercings can cause problems, said Peterson, who
is president-elect of the American Society of
Anesthesiologists. Before a child’s surgery, she’ll pull a
very loose tooth and tell the patient to expect a visit from
the tooth fairy. "We can make a nice game of it."
In the British case, after the dentures were
removed, the man had several bouts of bleeding that
required more surgery before he recovered. The journal
article didn’t identify the man or the hospital involved. […]
Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/man-s-missingdentures-were-found-stuck-his-throat-8-n1041641 (edited).
In accordance with the text, all the following alternatives are
correct, EXCEPT:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399744
Inglês
Texto associado
Missing Dentures Found Stuck in Man's Throat 8 Days
After Surgery
Here’s why it’s best to remove false teeth before
surgery: You just might swallow them.
A medical journal is reporting the case of a 72-
year-old British man whose partial dentures apparently
got stuck in his throat during surgery and weren’t
discovered for eight days.
The man went to the emergency room because he
was having a hard time swallowing and was coughing up
blood. Doctors ordered a chest X-ray, diagnosed him with
what they wrongly thought was pneumonia and sent him
home with antibiotics and steroids. It took another
hospital visit before another X-ray revealed the problem:
His dentures — a metal roof plate and three false teeth —
lodged at the top of his throat.
The man thought his dentures were lost while he
was in the hospital for minor surgery.
How it happened isn’t exactly clear, but a halfdozen previous cases have been documented of dentures
going astray as surgical patients were put to sleep.
Placing a tube in a patient’s airway can push
things where they don’t belong, said Dr. Mary Dale
Peterson, an anesthesiologist at Driscoll Children’s
Hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas.
Besides dentures, retainers, loose teeth and
tongue piercings can cause problems, said Peterson, who
is president-elect of the American Society of
Anesthesiologists. Before a child’s surgery, she’ll pull a
very loose tooth and tell the patient to expect a visit from
the tooth fairy. "We can make a nice game of it."
In the British case, after the dentures were
removed, the man had several bouts of bleeding that
required more surgery before he recovered. The journal
article didn’t identify the man or the hospital involved. […]
Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/man-s-missingdentures-were-found-stuck-his-throat-8-n1041641 (edited).
In reference with the text, it is INCORRECT to affirm that by the time the man went to the emergency room:
Ano: 2019
Banca:
COPESE - UFT
Órgão:
UFT
Prova:
COPESE - UFT - 2019 - UFT - Vestibular - Primeiro Semestre - Língua Portuguesa, Inglês e Matemática |
Q1399743
Inglês
Texto associado
Missing Dentures Found Stuck in Man's Throat 8 Days
After Surgery
Here’s why it’s best to remove false teeth before
surgery: You just might swallow them.
A medical journal is reporting the case of a 72-
year-old British man whose partial dentures apparently
got stuck in his throat during surgery and weren’t
discovered for eight days.
The man went to the emergency room because he
was having a hard time swallowing and was coughing up
blood. Doctors ordered a chest X-ray, diagnosed him with
what they wrongly thought was pneumonia and sent him
home with antibiotics and steroids. It took another
hospital visit before another X-ray revealed the problem:
His dentures — a metal roof plate and three false teeth —
lodged at the top of his throat.
The man thought his dentures were lost while he
was in the hospital for minor surgery.
How it happened isn’t exactly clear, but a halfdozen previous cases have been documented of dentures
going astray as surgical patients were put to sleep.
Placing a tube in a patient’s airway can push
things where they don’t belong, said Dr. Mary Dale
Peterson, an anesthesiologist at Driscoll Children’s
Hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas.
Besides dentures, retainers, loose teeth and
tongue piercings can cause problems, said Peterson, who
is president-elect of the American Society of
Anesthesiologists. Before a child’s surgery, she’ll pull a
very loose tooth and tell the patient to expect a visit from
the tooth fairy. "We can make a nice game of it."
In the British case, after the dentures were
removed, the man had several bouts of bleeding that
required more surgery before he recovered. The journal
article didn’t identify the man or the hospital involved. […]
Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/man-s-missingdentures-were-found-stuck-his-throat-8-n1041641 (edited).
According to the text, it is CORRECT to affirm:
Conheça nossos planos