Foram encontradas 396 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
on the review below, which is entitled "Illusions of
Empire: Defining the New American Order".
Illusions of Empire: Defining the New
American Order
Source: www.foreignaffairs.org
March/April 2004 (Adapted)
In his book The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism,
Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Chalmers
Johnson advances the disturbing claim that the United
States' Cold War-era military power and far-flung base
system have, in the last decade, been consolidated in a
new form of global imperial rule. The United States,
according to Johnson, has become "a military
juggernaut intent on world domination."
Driven by a triumphalist ideology, an
exaggerated sense of threats, and a self-serving
military-industrial complex, this juggernaut is tightening
its grip on much of the world. The Pentagon has
replaced the State Department as the primary shaper of
foreign policy. Military commanders in regional
headquarters are modern-day proconsuls, warriordiplomats
who direct the United States' imperial reach.
Johnson fears that this military empire will corrode
democracy, bankrupt the nation, spark opposition, and
ultimately end in a Soviet-style collapse.
on the review below, which is entitled "Illusions of
Empire: Defining the New American Order".
Illusions of Empire: Defining the New
American Order
Source: www.foreignaffairs.org
March/April 2004 (Adapted)
In his book The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism,
Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Chalmers
Johnson advances the disturbing claim that the United
States' Cold War-era military power and far-flung base
system have, in the last decade, been consolidated in a
new form of global imperial rule. The United States,
according to Johnson, has become "a military
juggernaut intent on world domination."
Driven by a triumphalist ideology, an
exaggerated sense of threats, and a self-serving
military-industrial complex, this juggernaut is tightening
its grip on much of the world. The Pentagon has
replaced the State Department as the primary shaper of
foreign policy. Military commanders in regional
headquarters are modern-day proconsuls, warriordiplomats
who direct the United States' imperial reach.
Johnson fears that this military empire will corrode
democracy, bankrupt the nation, spark opposition, and
ultimately end in a Soviet-style collapse.
on the review below, which is entitled "Illusions of
Empire: Defining the New American Order".
Illusions of Empire: Defining the New
American Order
Source: www.foreignaffairs.org
March/April 2004 (Adapted)
In his book The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism,
Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Chalmers
Johnson advances the disturbing claim that the United
States' Cold War-era military power and far-flung base
system have, in the last decade, been consolidated in a
new form of global imperial rule. The United States,
according to Johnson, has become "a military
juggernaut intent on world domination."
Driven by a triumphalist ideology, an
exaggerated sense of threats, and a self-serving
military-industrial complex, this juggernaut is tightening
its grip on much of the world. The Pentagon has
replaced the State Department as the primary shaper of
foreign policy. Military commanders in regional
headquarters are modern-day proconsuls, warriordiplomats
who direct the United States' imperial reach.
Johnson fears that this military empire will corrode
democracy, bankrupt the nation, spark opposition, and
ultimately end in a Soviet-style collapse.
on the review below, which is entitled "Illusions of
Empire: Defining the New American Order".
Illusions of Empire: Defining the New
American Order
Source: www.foreignaffairs.org
March/April 2004 (Adapted)
In his book The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism,
Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Chalmers
Johnson advances the disturbing claim that the United
States' Cold War-era military power and far-flung base
system have, in the last decade, been consolidated in a
new form of global imperial rule. The United States,
according to Johnson, has become "a military
juggernaut intent on world domination."
Driven by a triumphalist ideology, an
exaggerated sense of threats, and a self-serving
military-industrial complex, this juggernaut is tightening
its grip on much of the world. The Pentagon has
replaced the State Department as the primary shaper of
foreign policy. Military commanders in regional
headquarters are modern-day proconsuls, warriordiplomats
who direct the United States' imperial reach.
Johnson fears that this military empire will corrode
democracy, bankrupt the nation, spark opposition, and
ultimately end in a Soviet-style collapse.
on the review below, which is entitled "Illusions of
Empire: Defining the New American Order".
Illusions of Empire: Defining the New
American Order
Source: www.foreignaffairs.org
March/April 2004 (Adapted)
In his book The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism,
Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, Chalmers
Johnson advances the disturbing claim that the United
States' Cold War-era military power and far-flung base
system have, in the last decade, been consolidated in a
new form of global imperial rule. The United States,
according to Johnson, has become "a military
juggernaut intent on world domination."
Driven by a triumphalist ideology, an
exaggerated sense of threats, and a self-serving
military-industrial complex, this juggernaut is tightening
its grip on much of the world. The Pentagon has
replaced the State Department as the primary shaper of
foreign policy. Military commanders in regional
headquarters are modern-day proconsuls, warriordiplomats
who direct the United States' imperial reach.
Johnson fears that this military empire will corrode
democracy, bankrupt the nation, spark opposition, and
ultimately end in a Soviet-style collapse.
and 22:
Brazil's foreign policy: A giant stirs
Source: www.economist.co.uk
June 10, 2004 (Adapted)
It is a small force, but of huge symbolic significance.
This month, 1,200 Brazilian troops arrived in Haiti, the
country's biggest foreign military deployment since the
second world war. Brazil is commanding a United
Nations peacekeeping force of 6,700 mainly Latin
American troops and 1,600 police which is taking over
from American and French forces in the Caribbean
island. This marks a new departure. Brazil has long
been a gentle and introverted giant, content to be a
bystander on the world stage. Now that is changing.
Analyze the alternatives below in order to choose
the appropriate translation for the two sentences
below into Portuguese:
and 22:
Brazil's foreign policy: A giant stirs
Source: www.economist.co.uk
June 10, 2004 (Adapted)
It is a small force, but of huge symbolic significance.
This month, 1,200 Brazilian troops arrived in Haiti, the
country's biggest foreign military deployment since the
second world war. Brazil is commanding a United
Nations peacekeeping force of 6,700 mainly Latin
American troops and 1,600 police which is taking over
from American and French forces in the Caribbean
island. This marks a new departure. Brazil has long
been a gentle and introverted giant, content to be a
bystander on the world stage. Now that is changing.
Analyze the alternatives below in order to choose
the appropriate translation for the two sentences
below into Portuguese:
Analise o emprego dos sinais de pontuação nos períodos abaixo.
1) Passatempo ou obsessão? Desde que o mundo é mundo, há pessoas que se dedicam a colecionar coisas e juntar bugigangas.
2) Figurinhas, selos, latinhas de cerveja, caixas de fósforo - nada, escapa dos fiéis seguidores da tradição de juntar bugigangas.
3) Para o historiador alemão, Philipp Bloom o hábito de juntar quinquilharias tem justificativas históricas, filosóficas e psicológicas.
(Adaptado de artigo da revista Superinteressante, abril 2004)
Os sinais de pontuação estão corretamente empregados
Assinale a opção que corresponde a erro morfossintático, de concordância ou inadequação vocabular.
Nossa língua é, entre as grandes do mundo, certamente uma das que mais mudam de ano para ano, como se tomada por um desejo furibundo de se destruir, de perder sua identidade, de se esquecer e alienar- se de si. Devemos isso, em parte, à mania experimentalista que redundou na idolatria do "inventar", e caiu no mero beletrismo; em parte, devemos-lo ao jornalismo e à TV, que, ansiosos por imitar os trejeitos primeiromundistas, o fazem em prejuízo da lógica e da gramática.
(Baseado em Olavo de Carvalho, "O pensamento brasileiro no futuro: um apelo à responsabilidade histórica")
Analise as sentenças a seguir, à luz da seguinte norma gramatical:
Os particípios dado e visto têm valor passivo e concordam em gênero e número com o substantivo a que se referem.
(Extraído do Manual de Redação da Presidência da República)
Aponte a sentença que não cumpre a norma gramatical
supracitada.
Marque a única das substituições propostas que mantém a correção gramatical do texto abaixo transcrito.
Todo o aprendizado - raciocínio, memória, pensamento e imaginação - depende de um órgão do corpo humano que pesa mais ou menos 1,3 quilograma e é formado por cem bilhões de neurônios, que têm a capacidade de se multiplicarem mais de 250 mil vezes por minuto nos dois primeiros meses de gestação e cujos prolongamentos parecem um emaranhado de fios: o cérebro.
(Vitor F. Kümpel, "Resumos no processo do aprendizado")
Indique a opção que preenche com correção os espaços numerados do trecho abaixo.
....(1).... história por escrever do século vindouro cabe o desafio de encontrar formas de convívio em que ....(2).... força da integração seja o resultado da vitalidade das partes e em que .... (3).... independência das partes se associe a força da unidade.
(Adaptado de Paulo T. Flecha de Lima, "Acaba a América? Três Américas? E o Brasil?")
Relacione as ações (1), (2), (3) e (4) com o advérbio semanticamente adequado, conforme mostra o modelo, e assinale, a seguir, a seqüência correta.
Modelo: Falar com orgulho e insolência
Falar arrogantemente
(1) Exprimir-se com muitas palavras, com palavras em excesso
(2) Agir como criança
(3) Insinuar com perspicácia e delicadeza
(4) Eliminar sem se render a logros
( ) sutilmente
( ) puerilmente
( ) prolixamente
( ) inexoravelmente
A seqüência correta é:
Conheça nossos planos