Foram encontradas 494 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Ano: 2009 Banca: FCC Órgão: MRE Prova: FCC - 2009 - MRE - Oficial de Chancelaria |
Q77820 Português
O texto abaixo, para as questões de números 1 a 5, foi extraído de correspondência do renomado escritor norte-americano Norman Mailer endereçada ao crítico literário Peter Balbert.

Imagem 001.jpg

A alternativa que acolhe comentário condizente com as características da carta é:
Alternativas
Q2738053 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

"who" (L.7) can be correctly replaced by whom.

Alternativas
Q2738052 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

"coming up" (L.5) is synonymous with happening soon.

Alternativas
Q2738051 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

"both of which" (L.5) refers to "Texas and Ohio" (L.5).

Alternativas
Q2738050 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

According to the author, it would be a good idea to have two candidates with the same point of view

Alternativas
Q2738049 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

It is indifferent for the author whether either Clinton or Obama wins the election.

Alternativas
Q2738048 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

People hate both candidates the same way.

Alternativas
Q2738047 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

Obama and Clinton don't seem to share any characteristics.

Alternativas
Q2738046 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

Clinton remains in the lead election after election.

Alternativas
Q2738045 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

Never before has every single vote been so important for the democratic party.

Alternativas
Q2738044 Inglês

This text refers to items from 101 through 110.


The democratic race has never seemed so intriguing or so close, with each election’s results closely watched and delegates agreed, each vote really does seem to count this time around. Numbers of those turning out to the polls have reached new highs for a primary election, and one of the main drivers is the head-to-head race between Obama and Clinton. After Super Tuesday, Clinton was in the lead and sitting pretty. But since then, election after election has turned to Obama’s favor. Some big elections coming up include Texas and Ohio, both of which have Hillary in the lead.


But how different are these two candidates? People seem passionate about their candidates, but when looking at the two side by side, they are overall very similar. There are some who hate Hillary, and would not want her to be president, but the same is not true for Obama. At the same time, if my candidate of choice wasn’t elected president, I think I wouldn’t be opposed to the other winning the nomination. Which raises the question of a joint ticket1 between the two.


In the recent California debate Obama and Clinton were asked if they would consider a joint ticket, and both said yes. It seems interesting. They are both strong and successful and wouldn’t back down if the other didn’t see eye-to-eye with them. That’s the kind of relationship I want between my President and Vice President, if you pick a pair who agree on everything, what good does that serve? What if no one is looking at the issue from another angle?


However, I would be worried about the two partnering together with the red states, I think together they can seem too liberal and might not be the winning ticket. I still think a middle of road white male would be the best ticket for both. Although, personally I would be all for a joint ticket.


1 joint ticket – agreement.

2 back down – to stop supporting a position.

It is the first time that the democratic elections look so interesting.

Alternativas
Q2738043 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial, julgue os itens seguintes.

O pagamento de despesas de impostos com a utilização de créditos tributários, no caso de a empresa não possuir créditos suficientes para quitar totalmente a obrigação tributária, ocorre com débito na conta de despesas de impostos, crédito na conta de impostos antecipados e crédito no disponível.

Alternativas
Q2738042 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial, julgue os itens seguintes.

O registro do recebimento de doações e subvenções aumenta o valor do ativo disponível e o valor do resultado do exercício.

Alternativas
Q2738041 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial, julgue os itens seguintes.

O registro da venda de mercadorias à vista, considerando o inventário periódico, ocasiona débito no resultado e crédito no estoque de mercadorias, além de débito no disponível e crédito na conta de receita de vendas.

Alternativas
Q2738040 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial, julgue os itens seguintes.

O registro do pagamento de despesas de salários apropriadas no período anterior proporcionará decréscimo no passivo e redução no patrimônio líquido.

Alternativas
Q2738039 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial, julgue os itens seguintes.

O registro de aquisição de ações de outras companhias sem a intenção de comercialização futura não afeta o total do ativo da empresa investidora.

Alternativas
Q2738038 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial e seus reflexos nas demonstrações contábeis, julgue os itens subseqüentes.

A contratação de seguros antecipados não afeta o total do ativo circulante. A utilização do seguro, pago antecipadamente, durante o período de vigência, ocasionará um débito no resultado do exercício e um crédito na conta de seguros antecipados.

Alternativas
Q2738037 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial e seus reflexos nas demonstrações contábeis, julgue os itens subseqüentes.

A depreciação representa a parcela redutora do ativo em função do período de sua utilização. Sua correta contabilização proporcionará a obtenção do valor contábil do bem ao se interpretar o balanço patrimonial.

Alternativas
Q2738036 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial e seus reflexos nas demonstrações contábeis, julgue os itens subseqüentes.

A comercialização de ativos permanentes somente será evidenciada na demonstração do resultado do exercício no caso de lucro obtido. No caso de perda na venda de imobilizado, o registro ocorrerá em conta de ativo permanente.

Alternativas
Q2738035 Contabilidade Geral

Acerca da contabilização dos eventos de uma empresa comercial e seus reflexos nas demonstrações contábeis, julgue os itens subseqüentes.

A contabilização da distribuição de dividendos, com a transferência do montante aos sócios na mesma ocasião, proporciona um débito na conta de lucros ou prejuízos acumulados e um crédito no disponível da empresa.

Alternativas
Respostas
221: D
222: E
223: C
224: C
225: E
226: C
227: E
228: E
229: E
230: C
231: C
232: C
233: E
234: E
235: E
236: C
237: C
238: C
239: E
240: C