Foram encontradas 221.644 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
- Quando você _______ aqui, _______-me e eu atenderei imediatamente.
- Se você _______ o desentendimento entre eles, será gratificado.
- Isso somente acontecerá se eu não me _______ a vocês e se eu não _______ aquilo que já havia sido mencionado antes.
Em relação à estrutura do período acima, é correto afirmar que:
“A: video? some doc – documentary about Climate Change hm hm hm yeah and . . . it B: yes and . . . and you know if you have a Climate Change policy in the future you, you might not A: it’s an immoral yes immoral because er Climate Change means anyway they restrict economic rights B: no no no, I mean – er you mean that Climate Change is immoral and we shouldn’t restrict A: which one is first? . . . the Climate Change eh yes? . . . what do you think, B: the reason that I er I’m against the Climate Change policy . . . when I was at school mh I A: very hard for the government. If er the Climate Change policy is not permitted and they will B: Climate Change? eh yes? . . . what do you think, Climate Change is an immoral act or not? hmm,”
The provided text analyzes a conversation in which the controversial concept of “Climate Change” functions as a keyword and is notably often preceded by the definite article ('the Climate Change'). This signals that speakers are often referring to the concept in general terms, which can heighten its sensitive, abstract, and politicized nature.
In your role as a Technical Specialist in Educational Affairs, advising a research team preparing a publication on an equally controversial, general concept (e.g., 'sustainable development equity' or 'global carbon tax') for an international journal, which directive best integrates Communicative Competence in ELF with the principles of Interculturality when addressing such “keywords”? Adapted from: DEWEY, Martin. English as a lingua franca and globalization: an interconnected perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 17, n. 3, 2007, p. 340.
Considering this shift, what policy change is most crucial for developing communicative competence within the framework of higher education internationalization?
Which intervention strategy best aligns with Critical and Decolonial Perspectives to resolve the conflict and promote Epistemic Justice in the classroom?
In this case, which strategic action best demonstrates the application of Communicative Competence in an English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) and Interculturality context to resolve the impasse and provide capacity building to the Brazilian team?
“[…] Brazil faces many challenges to learn foreign languages, be them the language of their parents (heritage languages such as Guarani and other indigenous languages or immigrant languages such as Italian, German, Japanese and Pomeranian, to cite but a few), the language of their neighbors (Spanish), the international language (English) or even appropriations of English such as Brazilian English, whatever that may be. Jenkins proposes the view of English as a multilingual franca as referring to its use in multilingual contexts where most people share the same lingua franca, and in that sense, Finardi proposes that English has the status of an international language, rather than a multilingua franca in Brazil. In a country with more than 200 languages spoken by minorities, the development of multilingualism and the view of English as a multilingua franca in Brazil represent a huge challenge for educational policies and pockets […].”
Considering the theoretical role of ELF (English as a Lingua Franca) and the context described, which statement best describes the essential function that ELF must fulfill to mitigate the national risk of linguistic isolation and strategically facilitate global engagement?
Based on the critical perspective that you must go beyond methodology to consider political issues, analyze the following proposed actions and choose the correct alternative.
I. Initiate a mandatory, analytical seminar where students collectively debate how English is used in their field’s research, emphasizing that active engagement is key to preventing selfexclusion from global knowledge. II. Remove the EAP module from the curriculum, respecting the students’ resistance as a political decision to reject linguistic imperialism. III. Focus on improving students' grammar and vocabulary to native standards, dismissing their political arguments as irrelevant to communicative skills. IV. Promote a discussion where the EAP course is reframed to focus on English as a Lingua Franca (ELF), highlighting its use by non-native speakers to publish and circulate Global South research. V. Transfer the course to the History department, arguing that the political issues related to English are not the responsibility of the Internationalization Office.
“With the promulgation of the bill 746/2016, converted into law in 2017, that reforms education in Brazil, English was made the only mandatory foreign language in schools, thus threatening the teaching/learning of other foreign languages such as Spanish, French, and Italian. […] Yet, the educational reforms and internationalization agendas are far from reaching consensus among linguists and higher education stakeholders when it comes to the use, teaching and learning of languages for internationalization purposes.”
Considering the need for a critical and sustainable internationalization agenda, which of the following is the most critical implication of making English the sole mandatory foreign language?