In principio erat verbum

No princípio era o mito. Depois surge a ficção. Mais tarde ainda aparece a ciência. À medida que esta vai ganhando especificidade, separa-se tanto do mito quanto da ficção. Começa a combatê-los. É o princípio da realidade em luta contra o do imaginário. No final do século XIX, havia uma crença absoluta na ciência, a certeza de que erradicaria os mitos do mundo; de que faria triunfar o princípio da realidade, afastando os erros e as superstições, associados ao mito; de que o estado positivo deixaria nas brumas da História os estados teológico e metafísico. Hoje, depois de os mitos terem sido declarados mortos, estão bastante vivos. Nos subterrâneos, nutrem a ficção, a utopia e a ciência.

Não se trata aqui de, em nome de um irracionalismo muito em voga mesmo na Universidade, criticar a ciência, desmoralizá-la, descrer dela, mas tão somente de reconhecer que a literatura, lugar por excelência de expressão dos mitos na modernidade, é uma forma tão boa de conhecimento quanto a ciência. Não se quer fazer apologia do pensamento mítico, cuja principal característica, segundo Lotman, é ser incompatível com a metáfora (1981: 141). Com efeito, para um cristão, por exemplo, é uma blasfêmia dizer que o pão e o vinho simbolizam o corpo de Cristo, pois, para ele, eles o são verdadeiramente. O que se pretende é mostrar que o mito, extraído do meio em que ele é, constitui uma explicação do homem para aquilo que é inexplicável, o que significa que é uma súmula do conhecimento de cada cultura a respeito das grandes questões com que o ser humano sempre se debateu. Isso possibilita duas leituras do mito: uma temática, realizada pela ciência, e uma figurativa, feita pela arte. Dessa forma, o mito irriga o pensamento científico e a realização artística, ele continua a alimentar todas as formas de apreender a realidade.

Mas por que a permanência do mito como algo em que se crê e que dispensa a mediação da ciência e da arte? Explicitemos melhor uma ideia exposta no parágrafo anterior. O mito é uma explicação das origens do homem, do mundo, da linguagem; explica o sentido da vida, a morte, a dor, a condição humana. Vive porque responde à angústia do desconhecido, do inexplicável; dá sentido àquilo que não tem sentido. Enquanto a ciência não puder explicar a origem das coisas e o seu sentido, haverá lugar para o pensamento mítico. Será que esse ideal se tornará realidade um dia? Dificilmente. Como se dará conta dos novos anseios, dos novos desejos do ser humano? Precisamos das utopias, que, sendo uma espécie de mito pré-construído, têm a função de organizar e de orientar o futuro.

FIORIN, J. L. As astúcias da enunciação: as categorias de pessoa, espaço e tempo. São Paulo: Ática, 1996, p. 9-10. 

In principio erat verbum

No princípio era o mito. Depois surge a ficção. Mais tarde ainda aparece a ciência. À medida que esta vai ganhando especificidade, separa-se tanto do mito quanto da ficção. Começa a combatê-los. É o princípio da realidade em luta contra o do imaginário. No final do século XIX, havia uma crença absoluta na ciência, a certeza de que erradicaria os mitos do mundo; de que faria triunfar o princípio da realidade, afastando os erros e as superstições, associados ao mito; de que o estado positivo deixaria nas brumas da História os estados teológico e metafísico. Hoje, depois de os mitos terem sido declarados mortos, estão bastante vivos. Nos subterrâneos, nutrem a ficção, a utopia e a ciência.

Não se trata aqui de, em nome de um irracionalismo muito em voga mesmo na Universidade, criticar a ciência, desmoralizá-la, descrer dela, mas tão somente de reconhecer que a literatura, lugar por excelência de expressão dos mitos na modernidade, é uma forma tão boa de conhecimento quanto a ciência. Não se quer fazer apologia do pensamento mítico, cuja principal característica, segundo Lotman, é ser incompatível com a metáfora (1981: 141). Com efeito, para um cristão, por exemplo, é uma blasfêmia dizer que o pão e o vinho simbolizam o corpo de Cristo, pois, para ele, eles o são verdadeiramente. O que se pretende é mostrar que o mito, extraído do meio em que ele é, constitui uma explicação do homem para aquilo que é inexplicável, o que significa que é uma súmula do conhecimento de cada cultura a respeito das grandes questões com que o ser humano sempre se debateu. Isso possibilita duas leituras do mito: uma temática, realizada pela ciência, e uma figurativa, feita pela arte. Dessa forma, o mito irriga o pensamento científico e a realização artística, ele continua a alimentar todas as formas de apreender a realidade.

Mas por que a permanência do mito como algo em que se crê e que dispensa a mediação da ciência e da arte? Explicitemos melhor uma ideia exposta no parágrafo anterior. O mito é uma explicação das origens do homem, do mundo, da linguagem; explica o sentido da vida, a morte, a dor, a condição humana. Vive porque responde à angústia do desconhecido, do inexplicável; dá sentido àquilo que não tem sentido. Enquanto a ciência não puder explicar a origem das coisas e o seu sentido, haverá lugar para o pensamento mítico. Será que esse ideal se tornará realidade um dia? Dificilmente. Como se dará conta dos novos anseios, dos novos desejos do ser humano? Precisamos das utopias, que, sendo uma espécie de mito pré-construído, têm a função de organizar e de orientar o futuro.

FIORIN, J. L. As astúcias da enunciação: as categorias de pessoa, espaço e tempo. São Paulo: Ática, 1996, p. 9-10. 

In principio erat verbum

No princípio era o mito. Depois surge a ficção. Mais tarde ainda aparece a ciência. À medida que esta vai ganhando especificidade, separa-se tanto do mito quanto da ficção. Começa a combatê-los. É o princípio da realidade em luta contra o do imaginário. No final do século XIX, havia uma crença absoluta na ciência, a certeza de que erradicaria os mitos do mundo; de que faria triunfar o princípio da realidade, afastando os erros e as superstições, associados ao mito; de que o estado positivo deixaria nas brumas da História os estados teológico e metafísico. Hoje, depois de os mitos terem sido declarados mortos, estão bastante vivos. Nos subterrâneos, nutrem a ficção, a utopia e a ciência.

Não se trata aqui de, em nome de um irracionalismo muito em voga mesmo na Universidade, criticar a ciência, desmoralizá-la, descrer dela, mas tão somente de reconhecer que a literatura, lugar por excelência de expressão dos mitos na modernidade, é uma forma tão boa de conhecimento quanto a ciência. Não se quer fazer apologia do pensamento mítico, cuja principal característica, segundo Lotman, é ser incompatível com a metáfora (1981: 141). Com efeito, para um cristão, por exemplo, é uma blasfêmia dizer que o pão e o vinho simbolizam o corpo de Cristo, pois, para ele, eles o são verdadeiramente. O que se pretende é mostrar que o mito, extraído do meio em que ele é, constitui uma explicação do homem para aquilo que é inexplicável, o que significa que é uma súmula do conhecimento de cada cultura a respeito das grandes questões com que o ser humano sempre se debateu. Isso possibilita duas leituras do mito: uma temática, realizada pela ciência, e uma figurativa, feita pela arte. Dessa forma, o mito irriga o pensamento científico e a realização artística, ele continua a alimentar todas as formas de apreender a realidade.

Mas por que a permanência do mito como algo em que se crê e que dispensa a mediação da ciência e da arte? Explicitemos melhor uma ideia exposta no parágrafo anterior. O mito é uma explicação das origens do homem, do mundo, da linguagem; explica o sentido da vida, a morte, a dor, a condição humana. Vive porque responde à angústia do desconhecido, do inexplicável; dá sentido àquilo que não tem sentido. Enquanto a ciência não puder explicar a origem das coisas e o seu sentido, haverá lugar para o pensamento mítico. Será que esse ideal se tornará realidade um dia? Dificilmente. Como se dará conta dos novos anseios, dos novos desejos do ser humano? Precisamos das utopias, que, sendo uma espécie de mito pré-construído, têm a função de organizar e de orientar o futuro.

FIORIN, J. L. As astúcias da enunciação: as categorias de pessoa, espaço e tempo. São Paulo: Ática, 1996, p. 9-10. 

In principio erat verbum

No princípio era o mito. Depois surge a ficção. Mais tarde ainda aparece a ciência. À medida que esta vai ganhando especificidade, separa-se tanto do mito quanto da ficção. Começa a combatê-los. É o princípio da realidade em luta contra o do imaginário. No final do século XIX, havia uma crença absoluta na ciência, a certeza de que erradicaria os mitos do mundo; de que faria triunfar o princípio da realidade, afastando os erros e as superstições, associados ao mito; de que o estado positivo deixaria nas brumas da História os estados teológico e metafísico. Hoje, depois de os mitos terem sido declarados mortos, estão bastante vivos. Nos subterrâneos, nutrem a ficção, a utopia e a ciência.

Não se trata aqui de, em nome de um irracionalismo muito em voga mesmo na Universidade, criticar a ciência, desmoralizá-la, descrer dela, mas tão somente de reconhecer que a literatura, lugar por excelência de expressão dos mitos na modernidade, é uma forma tão boa de conhecimento quanto a ciência. Não se quer fazer apologia do pensamento mítico, cuja principal característica, segundo Lotman, é ser incompatível com a metáfora (1981: 141). Com efeito, para um cristão, por exemplo, é uma blasfêmia dizer que o pão e o vinho simbolizam o corpo de Cristo, pois, para ele, eles o são verdadeiramente. O que se pretende é mostrar que o mito, extraído do meio em que ele é, constitui uma explicação do homem para aquilo que é inexplicável, o que significa que é uma súmula do conhecimento de cada cultura a respeito das grandes questões com que o ser humano sempre se debateu. Isso possibilita duas leituras do mito: uma temática, realizada pela ciência, e uma figurativa, feita pela arte. Dessa forma, o mito irriga o pensamento científico e a realização artística, ele continua a alimentar todas as formas de apreender a realidade.

Mas por que a permanência do mito como algo em que se crê e que dispensa a mediação da ciência e da arte? Explicitemos melhor uma ideia exposta no parágrafo anterior. O mito é uma explicação das origens do homem, do mundo, da linguagem; explica o sentido da vida, a morte, a dor, a condição humana. Vive porque responde à angústia do desconhecido, do inexplicável; dá sentido àquilo que não tem sentido. Enquanto a ciência não puder explicar a origem das coisas e o seu sentido, haverá lugar para o pensamento mítico. Será que esse ideal se tornará realidade um dia? Dificilmente. Como se dará conta dos novos anseios, dos novos desejos do ser humano? Precisamos das utopias, que, sendo uma espécie de mito pré-construído, têm a função de organizar e de orientar o futuro.

FIORIN, J. L. As astúcias da enunciação: as categorias de pessoa, espaço e tempo. São Paulo: Ática, 1996, p. 9-10. 

In principio erat verbum

No princípio era o mito. Depois surge a ficção. Mais tarde ainda aparece a ciência. À medida que esta vai ganhando especificidade, separa-se tanto do mito quanto da ficção. Começa a combatê-los. É o princípio da realidade em luta contra o do imaginário. No final do século XIX, havia uma crença absoluta na ciência, a certeza de que erradicaria os mitos do mundo; de que faria triunfar o princípio da realidade, afastando os erros e as superstições, associados ao mito; de que o estado positivo deixaria nas brumas da História os estados teológico e metafísico. Hoje, depois de os mitos terem sido declarados mortos, estão bastante vivos. Nos subterrâneos, nutrem a ficção, a utopia e a ciência.

Não se trata aqui de, em nome de um irracionalismo muito em voga mesmo na Universidade, criticar a ciência, desmoralizá-la, descrer dela, mas tão somente de reconhecer que a literatura, lugar por excelência de expressão dos mitos na modernidade, é uma forma tão boa de conhecimento quanto a ciência. Não se quer fazer apologia do pensamento mítico, cuja principal característica, segundo Lotman, é ser incompatível com a metáfora (1981: 141). Com efeito, para um cristão, por exemplo, é uma blasfêmia dizer que o pão e o vinho simbolizam o corpo de Cristo, pois, para ele, eles o são verdadeiramente. O que se pretende é mostrar que o mito, extraído do meio em que ele é, constitui uma explicação do homem para aquilo que é inexplicável, o que significa que é uma súmula do conhecimento de cada cultura a respeito das grandes questões com que o ser humano sempre se debateu. Isso possibilita duas leituras do mito: uma temática, realizada pela ciência, e uma figurativa, feita pela arte. Dessa forma, o mito irriga o pensamento científico e a realização artística, ele continua a alimentar todas as formas de apreender a realidade.

Mas por que a permanência do mito como algo em que se crê e que dispensa a mediação da ciência e da arte? Explicitemos melhor uma ideia exposta no parágrafo anterior. O mito é uma explicação das origens do homem, do mundo, da linguagem; explica o sentido da vida, a morte, a dor, a condição humana. Vive porque responde à angústia do desconhecido, do inexplicável; dá sentido àquilo que não tem sentido. Enquanto a ciência não puder explicar a origem das coisas e o seu sentido, haverá lugar para o pensamento mítico. Será que esse ideal se tornará realidade um dia? Dificilmente. Como se dará conta dos novos anseios, dos novos desejos do ser humano? Precisamos das utopias, que, sendo uma espécie de mito pré-construído, têm a função de organizar e de orientar o futuro.

FIORIN, J. L. As astúcias da enunciação: as categorias de pessoa, espaço e tempo. São Paulo: Ática, 1996, p. 9-10. 

In principio erat verbum

No princípio era o mito. Depois surge a ficção. Mais tarde ainda aparece a ciência. À medida que esta vai ganhando especificidade, separa-se tanto do mito quanto da ficção. Começa a combatê-los. É o princípio da realidade em luta contra o do imaginário. No final do século XIX, havia uma crença absoluta na ciência, a certeza de que erradicaria os mitos do mundo; de que faria triunfar o princípio da realidade, afastando os erros e as superstições, associados ao mito; de que o estado positivo deixaria nas brumas da História os estados teológico e metafísico. Hoje, depois de os mitos terem sido declarados mortos, estão bastante vivos. Nos subterrâneos, nutrem a ficção, a utopia e a ciência.

Não se trata aqui de, em nome de um irracionalismo muito em voga mesmo na Universidade, criticar a ciência, desmoralizá-la, descrer dela, mas tão somente de reconhecer que a literatura, lugar por excelência de expressão dos mitos na modernidade, é uma forma tão boa de conhecimento quanto a ciência. Não se quer fazer apologia do pensamento mítico, cuja principal característica, segundo Lotman, é ser incompatível com a metáfora (1981: 141). Com efeito, para um cristão, por exemplo, é uma blasfêmia dizer que o pão e o vinho simbolizam o corpo de Cristo, pois, para ele, eles o são verdadeiramente. O que se pretende é mostrar que o mito, extraído do meio em que ele é, constitui uma explicação do homem para aquilo que é inexplicável, o que significa que é uma súmula do conhecimento de cada cultura a respeito das grandes questões com que o ser humano sempre se debateu. Isso possibilita duas leituras do mito: uma temática, realizada pela ciência, e uma figurativa, feita pela arte. Dessa forma, o mito irriga o pensamento científico e a realização artística, ele continua a alimentar todas as formas de apreender a realidade.

Mas por que a permanência do mito como algo em que se crê e que dispensa a mediação da ciência e da arte? Explicitemos melhor uma ideia exposta no parágrafo anterior. O mito é uma explicação das origens do homem, do mundo, da linguagem; explica o sentido da vida, a morte, a dor, a condição humana. Vive porque responde à angústia do desconhecido, do inexplicável; dá sentido àquilo que não tem sentido. Enquanto a ciência não puder explicar a origem das coisas e o seu sentido, haverá lugar para o pensamento mítico. Será que esse ideal se tornará realidade um dia? Dificilmente. Como se dará conta dos novos anseios, dos novos desejos do ser humano? Precisamos das utopias, que, sendo uma espécie de mito pré-construído, têm a função de organizar e de orientar o futuro.

FIORIN, J. L. As astúcias da enunciação: as categorias de pessoa, espaço e tempo. São Paulo: Ática, 1996, p. 9-10. 

A Brief and Simplified Description of Papermaking

The paper we use today is created from individual wood fibers that are first suspended in water and then pressed and dried into sheets. The process of converting the wood to a suspension of wood fibers in water is known as pulp making, while the manufacture of the dried and pressed sheets of paper is formally termed papermaking. The process of making paper has undergone a steady evolution, and larger and more sophisticated equipment and better technology continue to improve it.

The Wood yard and Wood rooms

The process at Androscogging began with receiving wood in the form of chips or of logs 4 or 8 feet in length. From 6 AM to 10 PM a steady stream of trucks and railroad cars were weighted and unloaded. About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs. The mill also received wood chips from lumber mills in the area. The chips and logs were stored in mammoth piles with separate piles for wood of different species (such as pine, spruce, hemlock).

When needed, logs were floated in flumes......(1).....the wood yard.....(2).....one of the mill’s three wood rooms. There, bark was rubbed......(3)........in long, ribbed debarking drums by tumbling the logs against one another. The logs then fell into a chipper;......(4)......seconds a large log was reduced to a pile of chips approximately 1 inch by 1 inch by 1/4 inch.

The chips were stored in silos. There were separate silos for softwoods (spruce, fir, hemlock, and pine) and hardwoods (maple, oak, beech, and birch). This separate and temporary storage of chips permitted the controlled mixing of chips into the precise recipe for the grade of paper being produced.

The wood chips were then sorted through large, flat vibrating screens. Oversized chips were rechipped, and ones that were too small were collected for burning in the power house. (The mill provided approximately 20 percent of all its own steam and electricity needs from burning waste. An additional 50 percent of total electricity needs was produced by harnessing the river for hydroelectric power.)

Once drawn from the silo into the digesters, there was no stopping the flow of chips into paper. 

Pulpmaking

The pulp made at Androscoggin was of two types: Kraft pulp (produced chemically) and ground wood pulp (produced mechanically). Kraft pulp was far more important to the high quality white papers produced at Androscoggin, accounting for 80 percent of all the pulp used. Kraft pulp makes strong paper. (Kraft is German for strength. A German invented the Kraft pulp process in 1884.) A paper’s strength generally comes from the overlap and binding of long fibers of softwood; only chemically was it initially possible to separate long wood fibers for suspension in water. Hardwood fibers are generally smaller and thinner and help smooth the paper and make it less porous.

The ground wood pulping process was simpler and less expensive than the Kraft process. It took high quality spruce and fir logs and pressed them continuously against a revolving stone that broke apart the wood’s fibers. The fibers, however, were smaller than those produced by the Kraft process and, although used to make newsprint, were useful at Androscoggin in providing “fill” for the coated publication gloss papers of machines 2 and 3, as will be described later.

^(A)The chemical Kraft process worked by dissolving the lignin that bonds wood fibers together. ^(B) It did this in a tall pressure cooker, called a digester, by “cooking” the chips in a solution of caustic soda (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na²S), which was termed the “white liquor.” ^(C)The two digesters at Androscoggin were continuous digesters; chips and liquor went into the top, were cooked together as they slowly settled down to the bottom, and were drawn off the bottom after about three hours. ^(D) By this time, the white liquor had changed chemically to “black liquor’’; the digested chips were then separated from this black liquor. ^(E)

In what was known as the “cold blow” process, the hot, pressurized chips were gradually cooled and depressurized. A “cold liquor’’ (170°F) was introduced to the bottom of the digester and served both to cool and to transport the digested chips to a diffusion washer that washed and depressurized the chips. Because so much of the lignin bonding the fibers together had been removed, the wood fiber in the chips literally fell apart at this stage.

The black liquor from the digester entered a separate four-step recovery process. Over 95 percent of the black liquor could be reconstituted as white liquor, thereby saving on chemical costs and significantly lowering pollution. The four-step process involved (1) washing the black liquor from the cooked fiber to produce weak black liquor, (2) evaporating the weak black liquor to a thicker consistency, (3) combustion of this heavy black liquor with sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄ ), and redissolving the smelt, yielding a “green liquor” (sodium carbonate + sodium sulfide), and (4) adding lime, which reacted with the green liquor to produce white liquor. The last step was known as causticization.

Meanwhile, the wood-fiber pulp was purged of impurities like bark and dirt by mechanical screening and by spinning the mixture in centrifugal cleaners. The pulp was then concentrated by removing water from it so that it could be stored and bleached more economically.

By this time, depending on the type of pulp being made, it had been between 3 1/2 and 5 hours since the chips had entered the pulp mill. 

All the Kraft pulp was then bleached. Bleaching took between 5 and 6 hours. It consisted of a three-step process in which (1) a mix of chlorine (Cl₂ ) and chlorine dioxide (CIO₂ ) was introduced to the pulp and the pulp was washed; (2) a patented mix of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), liquid oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ) was then added to the pulp and the pulp was again washed; and (3) chlorine dioxide (ClO₂ ) was introduced and the pulp washed a final time. The result was like fluffy cream of wheat. By this time the pulp was nearly ready to be made into paper.

From the bleachery, the stock of pulp was held for a short time in storage (a maximum of 16 hours) and then proceeded through a series of blending operations that permitted a string of additives (for example, filler clay, resins, brighteners, alum, dyes) to be mixed into the pulp according to the recipe for the paper grade being produced. Here, too, “broke” (paper wastes from the mill itself) was recycled into the pulp. The pulp was then once again cleaned and blended into an even consistency before moving to the papermaking machine itself.

It made a difference whether the broke was of coated or uncoated paper, and whether it was white or colored. White, uncoated paper could be recycled immediately. Colored, uncoated paper had to be rebleached. Coated papers, because of the clays in them, could not be reclaimed.

A Brief and Simplified Description of Papermaking

The paper we use today is created from individual wood fibers that are first suspended in water and then pressed and dried into sheets. The process of converting the wood to a suspension of wood fibers in water is known as pulp making, while the manufacture of the dried and pressed sheets of paper is formally termed papermaking. The process of making paper has undergone a steady evolution, and larger and more sophisticated equipment and better technology continue to improve it.

The Wood yard and Wood rooms

The process at Androscogging began with receiving wood in the form of chips or of logs 4 or 8 feet in length. From 6 AM to 10 PM a steady stream of trucks and railroad cars were weighted and unloaded. About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs. The mill also received wood chips from lumber mills in the area. The chips and logs were stored in mammoth piles with separate piles for wood of different species (such as pine, spruce, hemlock).

When needed, logs were floated in flumes......(1).....the wood yard.....(2).....one of the mill’s three wood rooms. There, bark was rubbed......(3)........in long, ribbed debarking drums by tumbling the logs against one another. The logs then fell into a chipper;......(4)......seconds a large log was reduced to a pile of chips approximately 1 inch by 1 inch by 1/4 inch.

The chips were stored in silos. There were separate silos for softwoods (spruce, fir, hemlock, and pine) and hardwoods (maple, oak, beech, and birch). This separate and temporary storage of chips permitted the controlled mixing of chips into the precise recipe for the grade of paper being produced.

The wood chips were then sorted through large, flat vibrating screens. Oversized chips were rechipped, and ones that were too small were collected for burning in the power house. (The mill provided approximately 20 percent of all its own steam and electricity needs from burning waste. An additional 50 percent of total electricity needs was produced by harnessing the river for hydroelectric power.)

Once drawn from the silo into the digesters, there was no stopping the flow of chips into paper. 

Pulpmaking

The pulp made at Androscoggin was of two types: Kraft pulp (produced chemically) and ground wood pulp (produced mechanically). Kraft pulp was far more important to the high quality white papers produced at Androscoggin, accounting for 80 percent of all the pulp used. Kraft pulp makes strong paper. (Kraft is German for strength. A German invented the Kraft pulp process in 1884.) A paper’s strength generally comes from the overlap and binding of long fibers of softwood; only chemically was it initially possible to separate long wood fibers for suspension in water. Hardwood fibers are generally smaller and thinner and help smooth the paper and make it less porous.

The ground wood pulping process was simpler and less expensive than the Kraft process. It took high quality spruce and fir logs and pressed them continuously against a revolving stone that broke apart the wood’s fibers. The fibers, however, were smaller than those produced by the Kraft process and, although used to make newsprint, were useful at Androscoggin in providing “fill” for the coated publication gloss papers of machines 2 and 3, as will be described later.

^(A)The chemical Kraft process worked by dissolving the lignin that bonds wood fibers together. ^(B) It did this in a tall pressure cooker, called a digester, by “cooking” the chips in a solution of caustic soda (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na²S), which was termed the “white liquor.” ^(C)The two digesters at Androscoggin were continuous digesters; chips and liquor went into the top, were cooked together as they slowly settled down to the bottom, and were drawn off the bottom after about three hours. ^(D) By this time, the white liquor had changed chemically to “black liquor’’; the digested chips were then separated from this black liquor. ^(E)

In what was known as the “cold blow” process, the hot, pressurized chips were gradually cooled and depressurized. A “cold liquor’’ (170°F) was introduced to the bottom of the digester and served both to cool and to transport the digested chips to a diffusion washer that washed and depressurized the chips. Because so much of the lignin bonding the fibers together had been removed, the wood fiber in the chips literally fell apart at this stage.

The black liquor from the digester entered a separate four-step recovery process. Over 95 percent of the black liquor could be reconstituted as white liquor, thereby saving on chemical costs and significantly lowering pollution. The four-step process involved (1) washing the black liquor from the cooked fiber to produce weak black liquor, (2) evaporating the weak black liquor to a thicker consistency, (3) combustion of this heavy black liquor with sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄ ), and redissolving the smelt, yielding a “green liquor” (sodium carbonate + sodium sulfide), and (4) adding lime, which reacted with the green liquor to produce white liquor. The last step was known as causticization.

Meanwhile, the wood-fiber pulp was purged of impurities like bark and dirt by mechanical screening and by spinning the mixture in centrifugal cleaners. The pulp was then concentrated by removing water from it so that it could be stored and bleached more economically.

By this time, depending on the type of pulp being made, it had been between 3 1/2 and 5 hours since the chips had entered the pulp mill. 

All the Kraft pulp was then bleached. Bleaching took between 5 and 6 hours. It consisted of a three-step process in which (1) a mix of chlorine (Cl₂ ) and chlorine dioxide (CIO₂ ) was introduced to the pulp and the pulp was washed; (2) a patented mix of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), liquid oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ) was then added to the pulp and the pulp was again washed; and (3) chlorine dioxide (ClO₂ ) was introduced and the pulp washed a final time. The result was like fluffy cream of wheat. By this time the pulp was nearly ready to be made into paper.

From the bleachery, the stock of pulp was held for a short time in storage (a maximum of 16 hours) and then proceeded through a series of blending operations that permitted a string of additives (for example, filler clay, resins, brighteners, alum, dyes) to be mixed into the pulp according to the recipe for the paper grade being produced. Here, too, “broke” (paper wastes from the mill itself) was recycled into the pulp. The pulp was then once again cleaned and blended into an even consistency before moving to the papermaking machine itself.

It made a difference whether the broke was of coated or uncoated paper, and whether it was white or colored. White, uncoated paper could be recycled immediately. Colored, uncoated paper had to be rebleached. Coated papers, because of the clays in them, could not be reclaimed.

A Brief and Simplified Description of Papermaking

The paper we use today is created from individual wood fibers that are first suspended in water and then pressed and dried into sheets. The process of converting the wood to a suspension of wood fibers in water is known as pulp making, while the manufacture of the dried and pressed sheets of paper is formally termed papermaking. The process of making paper has undergone a steady evolution, and larger and more sophisticated equipment and better technology continue to improve it.

The Wood yard and Wood rooms

The process at Androscogging began with receiving wood in the form of chips or of logs 4 or 8 feet in length. From 6 AM to 10 PM a steady stream of trucks and railroad cars were weighted and unloaded. About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs. The mill also received wood chips from lumber mills in the area. The chips and logs were stored in mammoth piles with separate piles for wood of different species (such as pine, spruce, hemlock).

When needed, logs were floated in flumes......(1).....the wood yard.....(2).....one of the mill’s three wood rooms. There, bark was rubbed......(3)........in long, ribbed debarking drums by tumbling the logs against one another. The logs then fell into a chipper;......(4)......seconds a large log was reduced to a pile of chips approximately 1 inch by 1 inch by 1/4 inch.

The chips were stored in silos. There were separate silos for softwoods (spruce, fir, hemlock, and pine) and hardwoods (maple, oak, beech, and birch). This separate and temporary storage of chips permitted the controlled mixing of chips into the precise recipe for the grade of paper being produced.

The wood chips were then sorted through large, flat vibrating screens. Oversized chips were rechipped, and ones that were too small were collected for burning in the power house. (The mill provided approximately 20 percent of all its own steam and electricity needs from burning waste. An additional 50 percent of total electricity needs was produced by harnessing the river for hydroelectric power.)

Once drawn from the silo into the digesters, there was no stopping the flow of chips into paper. 

Pulpmaking

The pulp made at Androscoggin was of two types: Kraft pulp (produced chemically) and ground wood pulp (produced mechanically). Kraft pulp was far more important to the high quality white papers produced at Androscoggin, accounting for 80 percent of all the pulp used. Kraft pulp makes strong paper. (Kraft is German for strength. A German invented the Kraft pulp process in 1884.) A paper’s strength generally comes from the overlap and binding of long fibers of softwood; only chemically was it initially possible to separate long wood fibers for suspension in water. Hardwood fibers are generally smaller and thinner and help smooth the paper and make it less porous.

The ground wood pulping process was simpler and less expensive than the Kraft process. It took high quality spruce and fir logs and pressed them continuously against a revolving stone that broke apart the wood’s fibers. The fibers, however, were smaller than those produced by the Kraft process and, although used to make newsprint, were useful at Androscoggin in providing “fill” for the coated publication gloss papers of machines 2 and 3, as will be described later.

^(A)The chemical Kraft process worked by dissolving the lignin that bonds wood fibers together. ^(B) It did this in a tall pressure cooker, called a digester, by “cooking” the chips in a solution of caustic soda (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na²S), which was termed the “white liquor.” ^(C)The two digesters at Androscoggin were continuous digesters; chips and liquor went into the top, were cooked together as they slowly settled down to the bottom, and were drawn off the bottom after about three hours. ^(D) By this time, the white liquor had changed chemically to “black liquor’’; the digested chips were then separated from this black liquor. ^(E)

In what was known as the “cold blow” process, the hot, pressurized chips were gradually cooled and depressurized. A “cold liquor’’ (170°F) was introduced to the bottom of the digester and served both to cool and to transport the digested chips to a diffusion washer that washed and depressurized the chips. Because so much of the lignin bonding the fibers together had been removed, the wood fiber in the chips literally fell apart at this stage.

The black liquor from the digester entered a separate four-step recovery process. Over 95 percent of the black liquor could be reconstituted as white liquor, thereby saving on chemical costs and significantly lowering pollution. The four-step process involved (1) washing the black liquor from the cooked fiber to produce weak black liquor, (2) evaporating the weak black liquor to a thicker consistency, (3) combustion of this heavy black liquor with sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄ ), and redissolving the smelt, yielding a “green liquor” (sodium carbonate + sodium sulfide), and (4) adding lime, which reacted with the green liquor to produce white liquor. The last step was known as causticization.

Meanwhile, the wood-fiber pulp was purged of impurities like bark and dirt by mechanical screening and by spinning the mixture in centrifugal cleaners. The pulp was then concentrated by removing water from it so that it could be stored and bleached more economically.

By this time, depending on the type of pulp being made, it had been between 3 1/2 and 5 hours since the chips had entered the pulp mill. 

All the Kraft pulp was then bleached. Bleaching took between 5 and 6 hours. It consisted of a three-step process in which (1) a mix of chlorine (Cl₂ ) and chlorine dioxide (CIO₂ ) was introduced to the pulp and the pulp was washed; (2) a patented mix of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), liquid oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ) was then added to the pulp and the pulp was again washed; and (3) chlorine dioxide (ClO₂ ) was introduced and the pulp washed a final time. The result was like fluffy cream of wheat. By this time the pulp was nearly ready to be made into paper.

From the bleachery, the stock of pulp was held for a short time in storage (a maximum of 16 hours) and then proceeded through a series of blending operations that permitted a string of additives (for example, filler clay, resins, brighteners, alum, dyes) to be mixed into the pulp according to the recipe for the paper grade being produced. Here, too, “broke” (paper wastes from the mill itself) was recycled into the pulp. The pulp was then once again cleaned and blended into an even consistency before moving to the papermaking machine itself.

It made a difference whether the broke was of coated or uncoated paper, and whether it was white or colored. White, uncoated paper could be recycled immediately. Colored, uncoated paper had to be rebleached. Coated papers, because of the clays in them, could not be reclaimed.

A Brief and Simplified Description of Papermaking

The paper we use today is created from individual wood fibers that are first suspended in water and then pressed and dried into sheets. The process of converting the wood to a suspension of wood fibers in water is known as pulp making, while the manufacture of the dried and pressed sheets of paper is formally termed papermaking. The process of making paper has undergone a steady evolution, and larger and more sophisticated equipment and better technology continue to improve it.

The Wood yard and Wood rooms

The process at Androscogging began with receiving wood in the form of chips or of logs 4 or 8 feet in length. From 6 AM to 10 PM a steady stream of trucks and railroad cars were weighted and unloaded. About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs. The mill also received wood chips from lumber mills in the area. The chips and logs were stored in mammoth piles with separate piles for wood of different species (such as pine, spruce, hemlock).

When needed, logs were floated in flumes......(1).....the wood yard.....(2).....one of the mill’s three wood rooms. There, bark was rubbed......(3)........in long, ribbed debarking drums by tumbling the logs against one another. The logs then fell into a chipper;......(4)......seconds a large log was reduced to a pile of chips approximately 1 inch by 1 inch by 1/4 inch.

The chips were stored in silos. There were separate silos for softwoods (spruce, fir, hemlock, and pine) and hardwoods (maple, oak, beech, and birch). This separate and temporary storage of chips permitted the controlled mixing of chips into the precise recipe for the grade of paper being produced.

The wood chips were then sorted through large, flat vibrating screens. Oversized chips were rechipped, and ones that were too small were collected for burning in the power house. (The mill provided approximately 20 percent of all its own steam and electricity needs from burning waste. An additional 50 percent of total electricity needs was produced by harnessing the river for hydroelectric power.)

Once drawn from the silo into the digesters, there was no stopping the flow of chips into paper. 

Pulpmaking

The pulp made at Androscoggin was of two types: Kraft pulp (produced chemically) and ground wood pulp (produced mechanically). Kraft pulp was far more important to the high quality white papers produced at Androscoggin, accounting for 80 percent of all the pulp used. Kraft pulp makes strong paper. (Kraft is German for strength. A German invented the Kraft pulp process in 1884.) A paper’s strength generally comes from the overlap and binding of long fibers of softwood; only chemically was it initially possible to separate long wood fibers for suspension in water. Hardwood fibers are generally smaller and thinner and help smooth the paper and make it less porous.

The ground wood pulping process was simpler and less expensive than the Kraft process. It took high quality spruce and fir logs and pressed them continuously against a revolving stone that broke apart the wood’s fibers. The fibers, however, were smaller than those produced by the Kraft process and, although used to make newsprint, were useful at Androscoggin in providing “fill” for the coated publication gloss papers of machines 2 and 3, as will be described later.

^(A)The chemical Kraft process worked by dissolving the lignin that bonds wood fibers together. ^(B) It did this in a tall pressure cooker, called a digester, by “cooking” the chips in a solution of caustic soda (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na²S), which was termed the “white liquor.” ^(C)The two digesters at Androscoggin were continuous digesters; chips and liquor went into the top, were cooked together as they slowly settled down to the bottom, and were drawn off the bottom after about three hours. ^(D) By this time, the white liquor had changed chemically to “black liquor’’; the digested chips were then separated from this black liquor. ^(E)

In what was known as the “cold blow” process, the hot, pressurized chips were gradually cooled and depressurized. A “cold liquor’’ (170°F) was introduced to the bottom of the digester and served both to cool and to transport the digested chips to a diffusion washer that washed and depressurized the chips. Because so much of the lignin bonding the fibers together had been removed, the wood fiber in the chips literally fell apart at this stage.

The black liquor from the digester entered a separate four-step recovery process. Over 95 percent of the black liquor could be reconstituted as white liquor, thereby saving on chemical costs and significantly lowering pollution. The four-step process involved (1) washing the black liquor from the cooked fiber to produce weak black liquor, (2) evaporating the weak black liquor to a thicker consistency, (3) combustion of this heavy black liquor with sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄ ), and redissolving the smelt, yielding a “green liquor” (sodium carbonate + sodium sulfide), and (4) adding lime, which reacted with the green liquor to produce white liquor. The last step was known as causticization.

Meanwhile, the wood-fiber pulp was purged of impurities like bark and dirt by mechanical screening and by spinning the mixture in centrifugal cleaners. The pulp was then concentrated by removing water from it so that it could be stored and bleached more economically.

By this time, depending on the type of pulp being made, it had been between 3 1/2 and 5 hours since the chips had entered the pulp mill. 

All the Kraft pulp was then bleached. Bleaching took between 5 and 6 hours. It consisted of a three-step process in which (1) a mix of chlorine (Cl₂ ) and chlorine dioxide (CIO₂ ) was introduced to the pulp and the pulp was washed; (2) a patented mix of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), liquid oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ) was then added to the pulp and the pulp was again washed; and (3) chlorine dioxide (ClO₂ ) was introduced and the pulp washed a final time. The result was like fluffy cream of wheat. By this time the pulp was nearly ready to be made into paper.

From the bleachery, the stock of pulp was held for a short time in storage (a maximum of 16 hours) and then proceeded through a series of blending operations that permitted a string of additives (for example, filler clay, resins, brighteners, alum, dyes) to be mixed into the pulp according to the recipe for the paper grade being produced. Here, too, “broke” (paper wastes from the mill itself) was recycled into the pulp. The pulp was then once again cleaned and blended into an even consistency before moving to the papermaking machine itself.

It made a difference whether the broke was of coated or uncoated paper, and whether it was white or colored. White, uncoated paper could be recycled immediately. Colored, uncoated paper had to be rebleached. Coated papers, because of the clays in them, could not be reclaimed.

A Brief and Simplified Description of Papermaking

The paper we use today is created from individual wood fibers that are first suspended in water and then pressed and dried into sheets. The process of converting the wood to a suspension of wood fibers in water is known as pulp making, while the manufacture of the dried and pressed sheets of paper is formally termed papermaking. The process of making paper has undergone a steady evolution, and larger and more sophisticated equipment and better technology continue to improve it.

The Wood yard and Wood rooms

The process at Androscogging began with receiving wood in the form of chips or of logs 4 or 8 feet in length. From 6 AM to 10 PM a steady stream of trucks and railroad cars were weighted and unloaded. About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs. The mill also received wood chips from lumber mills in the area. The chips and logs were stored in mammoth piles with separate piles for wood of different species (such as pine, spruce, hemlock).

When needed, logs were floated in flumes......(1).....the wood yard.....(2).....one of the mill’s three wood rooms. There, bark was rubbed......(3)........in long, ribbed debarking drums by tumbling the logs against one another. The logs then fell into a chipper;......(4)......seconds a large log was reduced to a pile of chips approximately 1 inch by 1 inch by 1/4 inch.

The chips were stored in silos. There were separate silos for softwoods (spruce, fir, hemlock, and pine) and hardwoods (maple, oak, beech, and birch). This separate and temporary storage of chips permitted the controlled mixing of chips into the precise recipe for the grade of paper being produced.

The wood chips were then sorted through large, flat vibrating screens. Oversized chips were rechipped, and ones that were too small were collected for burning in the power house. (The mill provided approximately 20 percent of all its own steam and electricity needs from burning waste. An additional 50 percent of total electricity needs was produced by harnessing the river for hydroelectric power.)

Once drawn from the silo into the digesters, there was no stopping the flow of chips into paper. 

Pulpmaking

The pulp made at Androscoggin was of two types: Kraft pulp (produced chemically) and ground wood pulp (produced mechanically). Kraft pulp was far more important to the high quality white papers produced at Androscoggin, accounting for 80 percent of all the pulp used. Kraft pulp makes strong paper. (Kraft is German for strength. A German invented the Kraft pulp process in 1884.) A paper’s strength generally comes from the overlap and binding of long fibers of softwood; only chemically was it initially possible to separate long wood fibers for suspension in water. Hardwood fibers are generally smaller and thinner and help smooth the paper and make it less porous.

The ground wood pulping process was simpler and less expensive than the Kraft process. It took high quality spruce and fir logs and pressed them continuously against a revolving stone that broke apart the wood’s fibers. The fibers, however, were smaller than those produced by the Kraft process and, although used to make newsprint, were useful at Androscoggin in providing “fill” for the coated publication gloss papers of machines 2 and 3, as will be described later.

^(A)The chemical Kraft process worked by dissolving the lignin that bonds wood fibers together. ^(B) It did this in a tall pressure cooker, called a digester, by “cooking” the chips in a solution of caustic soda (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na²S), which was termed the “white liquor.” ^(C)The two digesters at Androscoggin were continuous digesters; chips and liquor went into the top, were cooked together as they slowly settled down to the bottom, and were drawn off the bottom after about three hours. ^(D) By this time, the white liquor had changed chemically to “black liquor’’; the digested chips were then separated from this black liquor. ^(E)

In what was known as the “cold blow” process, the hot, pressurized chips were gradually cooled and depressurized. A “cold liquor’’ (170°F) was introduced to the bottom of the digester and served both to cool and to transport the digested chips to a diffusion washer that washed and depressurized the chips. Because so much of the lignin bonding the fibers together had been removed, the wood fiber in the chips literally fell apart at this stage.

The black liquor from the digester entered a separate four-step recovery process. Over 95 percent of the black liquor could be reconstituted as white liquor, thereby saving on chemical costs and significantly lowering pollution. The four-step process involved (1) washing the black liquor from the cooked fiber to produce weak black liquor, (2) evaporating the weak black liquor to a thicker consistency, (3) combustion of this heavy black liquor with sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄ ), and redissolving the smelt, yielding a “green liquor” (sodium carbonate + sodium sulfide), and (4) adding lime, which reacted with the green liquor to produce white liquor. The last step was known as causticization.

Meanwhile, the wood-fiber pulp was purged of impurities like bark and dirt by mechanical screening and by spinning the mixture in centrifugal cleaners. The pulp was then concentrated by removing water from it so that it could be stored and bleached more economically.

By this time, depending on the type of pulp being made, it had been between 3 1/2 and 5 hours since the chips had entered the pulp mill. 

All the Kraft pulp was then bleached. Bleaching took between 5 and 6 hours. It consisted of a three-step process in which (1) a mix of chlorine (Cl₂ ) and chlorine dioxide (CIO₂ ) was introduced to the pulp and the pulp was washed; (2) a patented mix of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), liquid oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ) was then added to the pulp and the pulp was again washed; and (3) chlorine dioxide (ClO₂ ) was introduced and the pulp washed a final time. The result was like fluffy cream of wheat. By this time the pulp was nearly ready to be made into paper.

From the bleachery, the stock of pulp was held for a short time in storage (a maximum of 16 hours) and then proceeded through a series of blending operations that permitted a string of additives (for example, filler clay, resins, brighteners, alum, dyes) to be mixed into the pulp according to the recipe for the paper grade being produced. Here, too, “broke” (paper wastes from the mill itself) was recycled into the pulp. The pulp was then once again cleaned and blended into an even consistency before moving to the papermaking machine itself.

It made a difference whether the broke was of coated or uncoated paper, and whether it was white or colored. White, uncoated paper could be recycled immediately. Colored, uncoated paper had to be rebleached. Coated papers, because of the clays in them, could not be reclaimed.