Questões de Concurso
Foram encontradas 606 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
González (2008): p. 5.
Analice las afirmaciones sobre el fragmento.
I. El esteriotipo de la semejanza entre el español y el portugués sirve como fuente única de información respecto al par portugués-español. II. Los factores lingüísticos y discursivos son importantes. III. La comprensión no depende exclusivamente de las normas gramaticales.
Señale:
“A abordagem construída ao longo deste artigo buscou contribuir para que vejamos que o debate sobre como a leitura é tratada na escola precisa ir além da discussão sobre os textos que circulam no tempo-espaço escolar. Observando os livros analisados, bem como outros trabalhos que tratam do tema, vemos que o texto já ocupa hoje um lugar consagrado na educação linguística escolar. Materiais escolares diversos, principalmente os livros aprovados no Programa Nacional do Livro Didático (PNLD) trazem textos em profusão, de diversos gêneros, esferas, tempos, regiões, variedades etc. Muitos, como vimos, já buscam, inclusive, integrar o trabalho com a leitura com o trabalho com a produção de texto e com a análise linguística, o que é efetivamente um avanço. Entretanto, quando analisamos as atividades de leitura trazidas nesses materiais, vemos que o modelo de leitura desenvolvido com esses textos majoritariamente não foge do modelo reprodutor que embasa as práticas mais tradicionais de alfabetização, como exemplificado na tirinha que abre este texto. Podemos dizer que, em alguma medida, passamos, ao longo de todo o nosso processo de escolarização, por práticas de leituras que nos exigem a repetição de textos, com momentos pontuais de reflexão e/ou de invenção sobre eles. A presença de atividades como as apresentadas neste texto, retiradas de materiais recentes, evidencia isso, posto que nenhuma atividade escolar de leitura deveria exigir a mera reprodução de informações apresentadas explicitamente na linearidade dos textos. Se isso, por um lado, me leva a crer que a leitura se encaixa em um modelo escolar maior de reprodução (ou de uma política de recognição), por outro, deve nos alertar para o fato de que precisamos olhar com atenção para a didática da leitura que se desenvolve ainda hoje na escola brasileira.”
VARGAS (2020): p. 52.
Respecto a este fragmento, el autor hace distintas consideraciones, a excepción de la siguiente opción:
Texto V
El Principe Ceniciento
Analice las afirmaciones sobre el fragmento.
I. Las formas de pretérito imperfecto de indicativo en el cuento sirven para oponer el estado inicial estático del Príncipe y del veterinario real al estado final del príncipe que hace todas las tareas domésticas.
II. En el cuento, el príncipe que “no quería dedicarse a las tareas reales” de pronto tiene que hacer las tareas de la casa y los demás no la hacen.
III. Al fin del cuento, la esposa del veterinario que había estado enferma se pone muy contenta porque gracias al príncipe ahora las tareas del hogar se compartirían entre todos.
Señale:
Forges
Teniendo en cuenta los recursos verbales y no verbales de la viñeta, señale (V) para la afirmación verdadera y (F) para la falsa.
( ) La expectativa del padre respecto a sus hijos va en contra de la expectativa de muchos padres. ( ) El lenguaje no verbal de los hijos parece demostrar que ellos no entienden de qué les habla el padre. ( ) La confianza del padre está íntimamente relacionada al hecho de que confirmen la postura de los jóvenes de su edad.
Las afirmativas son respectivamente:
I. El verbo gustar en español pertenece a una clase de verbos que se desvía del patrón SVO. II. El sujeto sintáctico no coincide con quien experimenta el evento expresado por el verbo. III. Construcciones con el verbo gustar admiten que la función de sujeto sintáctico esté ocupada por un verbo en infinitivo.
Señale:
Distintas estructuras verbales y no verbales presentes en la viñeta permiten que el lector identifique rasgos de la protagonista. Algunos de ellos se presentan a continuación, a excepción de la siguiente opción:
Montesa, S. y Garrido, A. (1994). La literatura en la clase de lengua. Actas del II Congreso de ASELE (pp. 449-457). Málaga: Universidad de Málaga: p. 453.
En el fragmento: “... el texto literario no debe ser traicionado.”, los autores hacen una crítica
Tras leer y comparar la viñeta de la cuestión anterior y la de esta cuestión , señale (V) para la afirmación verdadera y (F) para la falsa. ( ) En las dos viñetas, se trata del tema de la participación de los alumnos en la clase. ( ) En la viñeta de la cuestión anterior, hay un profesor interesado por la manera de trabajar de su colega. ( ) La profesora de esta viñeta recurre a la tecnología para acaparar la atención de sus alumnos.
Las afirmativas son, respectivamente,
Tras leer la viñeta, señale (V) para la afirmación verdadera y (F) para la falsa.
( ) El profesor no parece tener problemas con sus alumnos. ( ) El profesor establece como una de las causas para la manera como se portan los alumnos de la profesora sea la tecnología. ( ) La profesora engaña a su colega nombrando a una nueva metodología de enseñanza.
Las afirmativas son, respectivamente,
I. Se trata de un voseo de tipo pronominal-verbal. II. Se trata de un voseo de tipo únicamente pronominal. III. Es un voseo sólo verbal.
Señale:
Respecto a la historieta de autoría de Nik, una de las posibles interpretaciones inferibles de lo que Gaturro propone es que
Texto IV
Adolescente que asesinó a 4 personas en dos escuelas de Brasil almorzó con sus padres y se fue a la playa tras el crimen
El adolescente de 16 años que asesinó a cuatro personas e hirió a 10 en un ataque armado a dos escuelas en Brasil el pasado viernes actuó con total naturalidad tras el crimen e incluso fue almorzar con sus padres, a los que acompañó a la casa de playa de la familia, según detalles divulgados este lunes.
Tras el ataque, el autor del crimen, un exalumno de una de las escuelas atacadas, regresó a su casa, guardó las armas usadas, se cambió de ropa y almorzó con sus padres con total naturalidad, según relataron los progenitores a los responsables por la investigación.
Los padres, un teniente de la Policía Militarizada y una profesora jubilada que había trabajado en una de las escuelas, tan solo se enteraron de lo ocurrido cuando las autoridades fueron a buscar al adolescente a la casa de playa a la que habían viajado ese mismo viernes.
El responsable de la Comisaría, André Jaretta, afirmó que el homicida confesó en su testimonio que comenzó a planear el ataque en 2019, tras haber sido víctima de burlas en la escuela en que estudiaba.
Agregó que, a partir de ese momento, el joven comenzó a planear todos los detalles del ataque, que no reveló para nadie.
El adolescente afirmó que manipulaba a escondidas las dos armas que su padre guardaba en casa, con las que cometió el crimen, y que se preparó para el ataque viendo videos en internet.
El homicida confeso agregó que aprovechó un momento en la mañana del viernes en que sus padres fueron al supermercado para hacer compras para los días que pasarían en la casa de playa para apoderarse de las armas e ir a las escuelas más próximas de su residencia en uno de los vehículos de sus padres.
Según Jaretta, el adolescente, que no ha sido identificado hasta ahora por ser menor de edad, no tenía ningún blanco preestablecido y disparó indiscriminadamente contra las personas que estaban en las salas que invadió.
En la primera escuela vació el cargador de la pistola y en la segunda disparó con un revólver.
En el ataque murieron tres profesores, una niña de 12 años, mientras que tres heridos continúan ingresados en estado grave, incluida una niña de 14 años.
Agencia EFE, 28/11/2022. https://elcomercio.pe/
( ) El emisor manifiesta su opinión. ( ) Predomina la tercera persona de singular. ( )Predominan los tiempos pasados.
Las afirmativas son, respectivamente,
Respecto a este cómic, es correcto afirmar que
Respecto a este cómic, es correcto afirmar que
Text V
Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies
Some Final Remarks
Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.
The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.
Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.
The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.
The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.
From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje
37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.
Text V
Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies
Some Final Remarks
Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.
The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.
Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.
The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.
The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.
From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje
37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.
Text V
Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies
Some Final Remarks
Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.
The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.
Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.
The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.
The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.
From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje
37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.
Text V
Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies
Some Final Remarks
Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.
The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.
Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.
The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.
The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.
From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje
37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.
Text V
Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies
Some Final Remarks
Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.
The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.
Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.
The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.
The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.
From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje
37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.
Conheça nossos planos