Foram encontradas 7.363 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q3747568 Matemática
Dado que senα = x2 - 5x + 5,  então x ∈ ℝ tal que:
Alternativas
Q3747567 Matemática

Observe a sequência numérica S abaixo:


S = -3, 2, 3/2, 5, -3/4, 8, 3/8, 11...



O vigésimo primeiro termo de S é: 

Alternativas
Q3747565 Matemática
Um comerciante adquiriu para revenda duas mercadorias, X e Y, cada uma pelo mesmo preço de custo. A mercadoria X foi revendida com lucro de 25% e a mercadoria Y com prejuízo de 5%. O total das duas revendas foi de R$1.848,00. Logo, o lucro total do comerciante após essas revendas foi de:
Alternativas
Q3747563 Matemática
Duas funções, f e g, são tais que f(x + 1) = x- 9x + 20 e g(x - 3) = x2 - 5x + 6 . Assim, a mediana entre os zeros de f (x) e g(x) é:
Alternativas
Q3747562 Matemática
Um terreno em forma de losango tem suas diagonais medindo 15 metros e 16 metros. Esse terreno está à venda com desconto de 30%, pelo preço de R$168.000,00. Qual o valor do metro quadrado desse terreno sem o desconto?
Alternativas
Q3747561 Matemática
A idade de André está para a idade de Beto assim como 5 está para 6, e a idade de Beto está para a de Carlos assim como 2 para 3. Daqui a 5 anos, a soma das idades de André, Beto e Carlos será 55 anos. A idade atual de Carlos é:
Alternativas
Q3747553 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Take into account that certain English words are very similar in spelling and meaning to their Brazilian Portuguese counterparts because they come from the same origin. These words are known as “cognates”. With this in mind, choose the only option that correctly lists five English real cognates present in Text 2:
Alternativas
Q3747552 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
The expression “zero fear of making mistakes”, extracted from Text 2, emphasizes the importance of:
Alternativas
Q3747551 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Consider this sentence extracted from Text 2: “Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense”. Now, preserving its original meaning and use in the given context, choose the option that correctly classify the underlined word (“may”):
Alternativas
Q3747550 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Consider the following excerpt extracted from Text 2: “This is how language sticks”. Now, choose the alternative that correctly corresponds to the topic(s) in which it is associated in its original context:
Alternativas
Q3747549 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Supported by Text 2, choose the alternative that correctly reflects characteristic(s) of the teaching approach criticized by the author:
Alternativas
Q3747548 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
According to Text 2, the author believes that success, for beginner learners of English language, should be measured by:
Alternativas
Q3747547 Inglês
TEXT 2

English Should Not Be Taught Like It’s Physics: Rethinking How We Teach Beginner Level Learners

Introduction


When teaching English to beginner-level learners, one of the biggest mistakes we make is treating the language like a set of scientific formulas to be memorized. In the quintessential classroom of traditional, test-focused educational systems, English is often taught as though it were physics; it’s rigid, theoretical, and abstract. Language, however, is a far cry from the aforementioned descriptions. Language is dynamic, flexible, and has a certain “feel” to it.

The problem with the “Physics” Approach

Picture this: you walk into a physics class and sit down. Immediately, all sorts of theories, equations, and vocabulary you’ve never heard before are being thrown at you without any context. Doesn’t feel good, does it? That’s how many beginner-level English learners feel. This method relies heavily on grammar drills, vocabulary lists, and some pretty unnatural textbook dialogues. Learners may know the structure of the present perfect tense, but they choke when asked, “How was your weekend?” Why? Because they’ve been trained to decode language like a formula; not use it as a tool for expression.

What language really is

Language is instinctive. We don’t learn our first language by studying grammar rules, but rather through interaction, repetition, and real-life use. Babies don’t sit down with textbooks in their lap. They listen, observe, repeat, and gradually experiment; with zero fear of making mistakes. This is how language sticks. For beginner-level learners, especially adults, we need to replicate that natural process as much as possible. The focus should shift from knowledge about the language to using the language. There should also be some emphasis on making sure the process is enjoyable.

Rethinking success

We need to redefine what success looks like in beginner English classes. It’s not about perfect grammar. It’s about confidence, connection, and the ability to navigate simple conversations. It’s about the listener’s ability to understand what is being said by the speaker and vice-versa. I remember when I’d tease my grandma for mispronouncing words (for example, she’d say “brade” instead of “blade”), and her retort would be, “You understood me though, didn’t you?!”

It’s a win if a student can say, “I like sushi. You?” If they can ask, “Where is the toilet?” when they’re pressed, they’ve got more success than someone who has 50 verbs memorized but can’t use them.

Conclusion

English is NOT physics. It’s not about solving problems on paper; it’s about expressing thoughts and being understood, building relationships and making life easier in an everchanging global world. If we want our students to thrive, as well as keep being interested in improving and using English long after moving on from our lessons together, we need to stop treating the language like a set of scientific formulas and start treating it like what it truly is: a human skill.

Let’s make the classroom a space of interaction and communication, not calculation.


Content extracted and adapted from: https://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct25/english-should-not-be-taught-like-it-sphysics
Based on Text 2, related to its general idea, the English language classroom should focus primarily on: 
Alternativas
Q3747513 Educação Física
A aplicação dos princípios do treinamento esportivo é fundamental para que o profissional de Educação Física organize estímulos adequados, evite sobrecargas desnecessárias e promova adaptações fisiológicas consistentes. O correto entendimento desses princípios permite estruturar programas eficazes para diferentes objetivos — melhora de desempenho, saúde ou condicionamento físico.
Relacione a Coluna I, contendo os princípios do treinamento, com os conceitos da Coluna II. 

COLUNA I — Princípios
1. Individualidade Biológica 2. Sobrecarga 3. Especificidade 4. Continuidade 5. Interdependência Volume–Intensidade
COLUNA II — Conceitos
(a) Determina que o tipo de treinamento deve estar alinhado às características da tarefa, da modalidade ou do sistema energético predominante.
(b) Afirma que nenhum indivíduo responde ao exercício da mesma forma, exigindo ajustes no treinamento segundo fatores como genética, histórico motor, condicionamento prévio e estado de saúde.
(c) Reconhece que volume e intensidade são variáveis que se influenciam mutuamente, devendo ser manipuladas de maneira equilibrada para evitar estagnação ou danos ao processo de adaptação.
(d) Refere-se à necessidade de que a prática seja mantida de forma contínua, pois interrupções prolongadas reduzem ou eliminam as adaptações obtidas.
(e)Define que as cargas devem ser elevadas progressivamente, superando o nível habitual de esforço do indivíduo, para estimular respostas fisiológicas e promover evolução.


Assinale a correlação CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q3747512 Educação Física
O estudo da fisiologia do exercício permite compreender os efeitos imediatos e de longo prazo gerados pela prática de atividades físicas, ajudando o profissional de Educação Física a planejar intervenções adequadas para diferentes populações, como crianças, adultos, idosos e indivíduos com condições crônicas. A prescrição segura requer integração entre variáveis fisiológicas, comportamentais e ambientais, buscando otimizar desempenho, saúde e adaptabilidade ao treinamento.
Considerando esses aspectos, analise as alternativas e assinale a INCORRETA:
Alternativas
Q3747511 Pedagogia
A neurociência aplicada à educação fornece subsídios para compreender como o cérebro aprende, como processa informações motoras e como ambientes de ensino podem otimizar o desenvolvimento cognitivo, emocional e motor. No contexto da Educação Física, esses princípios ajudam a estruturar práticas que promovem aprendizagem motora significativa, fortalecimento das funções executivas, motivação e engajamento.
Considerando fundamentos atuais da neurociência educacional, analise as assertivas a seguir:

I. A aprendizagem motora é fortalecida quando o aluno vivencia experiências em que o movimento é associado a contextos significativos e emocionalmente relevantes, uma vez que emoções positivas ampliam a liberação de neurotransmissores relacionados à memória, como dopamina e noradrenalina.

II. A neurociência indica que a prática física estruturada estimula a plasticidade sináptica e favorece a maturação do córtex pré-frontal, região diretamente relacionada ao planejamento motor, autorregulação e tomada de decisão — especialmente em crianças e adolescentes.

III. Em concordância com princípios neurobiológicos atuais, o processo de aprendizagem é majoritariamente um fenômeno inato e automático, sendo pouco influenciado por variáveis ambientais, rotinas de prática ou instrução pedagógica planejada.

IV. Pesquisas em neurociência demonstram que a variação de estímulos motores, aliada ao feedback adequado durante a execução das tarefas, contribui para a consolidação das memórias procedimentais, melhorando precisão, coordenação e retenção do movimento aprendido.


Estão CORRETAS:
Alternativas
Q3747510 Educação Física
A análise da marcha humana é fundamental nas ciências aplicadas à Educação Física e à Motricidade Humana, pois fornece parâmetros relacionados à autonomia funcional, equilíbrio, comprimento dos passos, cadência, velocidade, instabilidade postural e risco de quedas — especialmente em crianças, adultos sedentários ou idosos. Testes consolidados como o Protocolo de Cerny, a Escala de Tinetti e o Timed Up and Go (TUG) constituem ferramentas amplamente utilizadas em pesquisas e avaliações clínicas, cada qual com objetivos e metodologias distintas.
Considerando as informações presentes no artigo, analise as assertivas a seguir:

I. O Protocolo de Cerny avalia a marcha habitual do indivíduo em uma passarela padronizada, permitindo mensurar velocidade, comprimento dos passos e adaptação da movimentação, sendo amplamente utilizado para investigar disfunções resultantes de alterações de base, equilíbrio ou cadência.

II. A Escala de Tinetti é composta por duas partes independentes — equilíbrio e marcha — e apresenta pontuação total de 28 pontos, sendo que valores abaixo de 19 indicam risco aumentado de quedas; esse instrumento não depende de equipamentos sofisticados e é sensível para identificar alterações sutis durante a marcha.

III. O teste Timed Up and Go (TUG), criado em 1991, é aplicado exclusivamente para idosos frágeis, não sendo considerado válido para crianças, adolescentes ou adultos, devido à impossibilidade de padronização do tempo de execução nesses grupos.

IV. A análise da marcha é uma ferramenta multidimensional, permitindo detectar não apenas alterações locomotoras, mas também relações entre força muscular, estabilidade de tronco, amplitude de movimento e capacidade funcional — o que explica sua relevância para diferentes populações.

V. Segundo o artigo, os testes de avaliação da marcha demonstram limitada aplicabilidade para fins científicos, razão pela qual sua adoção em estudos acadêmicos é restrita e pouco recomendada devido ao baixo grau de padronização metodológica.


Estão CORRETAS:
Alternativas
Q3747509 Educação Física
O Código de Ética Profissional do Sistema CONFEF/CREFs estabelece normas de conduta que orientam o exercício da profissão de Educação Física, reforçando princípios como responsabilidade, competência técnica, respeito à dignidade humana, sigilo profissional e cumprimento da legislação vigente. Além disso, o documento disciplina a relação do profissional com alunos, instituições, colegas de trabalho e a sociedade, exigindo práticas éticas que garantam segurança, qualidade e integridade das ações.
Com base nesses princípios, julgue cada afirmação como VERDADEIRA (V) ou FALSA (F):

( ) O Código de Ética determina que o Profissional de Educação Física deve pautar sua atuação nos preceitos da Lei nº 9.696/1998 e nas resoluções do CONFEF/CREFs, mantendo conduta profissional compatível com os princípios éticos.

( ) O Código permite que o Profissional de Educação Física exerça a profissão mesmo sem registro no CREF, desde que o serviço prestado seja voluntário e sem finalidade lucrativa.

( ) O Código estabelece que o Profissional de Educação Física tem o dever de prestar serviços tecnicamente competentes e seguros, configurando infração ética oferecer atendimento sem qualificação adequada.

( ) O Código admite discriminação ou exclusão de beneficiários com base em idade, condição física ou nível socioeconômico, desde que tais critérios sejam justificáveis dentro do contexto da atividade ofertada.

Assinale a sequência CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q3747507 Biologia
Os testículos, principais estruturas do sistema reprodutor masculino, atuam simultaneamente na produção de gametas e hormônios sexuais. 
Considerando o funcionamento anatômico-fisiológico do sistema reprodutor masculino e suas estruturas associadas, analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Os testículos têm como funções primárias a espermatogênese, que ocorre nos túbulos seminíferos, e a secreção de testosterona, hormônio produzido pelas células de Leydig.

II. O músculo cremaster atua na regulação térmica dos testículos, aproximando-os ou afastando-os do corpo, e essa regulação é essencial para a viabilidade da produção de espermatozoides.

III. A ereção peniana depende exclusivamente da ação hormonal da testosterona, sendo um processo independente de alterações hemodinâmicas.

IV. O corpo esponjoso circunda completamente a uretra e, junto aos corpos cavernosos, compõe as estruturas responsáveis pela ereção do pênis.


Estão CORRETAS: 
Alternativas
Q3747506 Biologia
O sistema reprodutor feminino envolve processos como puberdade, ciclo menstrual e gravidez, todos regulados por hormônios. A respeito do sistema reprodutor feminino, analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. A concepção (fecundação) sempre ocorre no útero, sendo as trompas de Falópio apenas trajetos de passagem sem participação na fecundação.

II. As meninas nascem com todos os óvulos que terão na vida; esses óvulos somente poderão originar uma gestação após as transformações da puberdade desencadeadas por hormônios liberados pelo cérebro, que estimulam o desenvolvimento dos ovários e a produção de estrogênio.

III. No ciclo menstrual, ocorre a ovulação (liberação de um óvulo), o revestimento uterino torna-se mais vascularizado para receber um óvulo fecundado; se não há fecundação, esse revestimento é eliminado como sangue menstrual, e o ciclo se repete mensalmente até a meia-idade.

IV. A hipófise libera hormônios cujas concentrações variam ao longo do mês e desencadeiam o ciclo menstrual; se ocorrer gravidez, outros hormônios são produzidos pelos órgãos reprodutores para suspender o ciclo e promover alterações no útero e, após o parto, hormônios específicos sinalizam às mamas a produção de leite.


Estão CORRETAS: 
Alternativas
Respostas
881: C
882: A
883: B
884: D
885: A
886: C
887: A
888: C
889: A
890: B
891: C
892: D
893: C
894: A
895: C
896: B
897: C
898: A
899: B
900: C