Selecionar segmento
Estude com questões de diferentes segmentos
Atenção: Isso limpará todos os campos já preenchidos no filtro!
Foram encontradas 25.503 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC - Professor Inglês |
Q3791617
Inglês
English for Specific Purposes (ESP), or Instrumental
English, focuses heavily on reading strategies. The strategy known as "Cognate Identification" helps students
by:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC - Professor Inglês |
Q3791616
Inglês
Teaching English involves integrating the four skills
(reading, listening, speaking, writing) and contextualizing
grammar. Mark T (True) or F (False) for the statements
below:
(__)Grammar should be taught as a tool for communication, focusing on how structures create meaning in texts, rather than as a set of isolated rules.
(__)Reading and listening are receptive skills, while speaking and writing are productive skills, and they should support each other in the learning process.
(__)Speaking skills should be delayed until the student has memorized all the grammar rules of the language perfectly.
(__)Writing activities should always focus on copying sentences from the board to ensure correct spelling, avoiding creative production.
Mark the alternative that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
(__)Grammar should be taught as a tool for communication, focusing on how structures create meaning in texts, rather than as a set of isolated rules.
(__)Reading and listening are receptive skills, while speaking and writing are productive skills, and they should support each other in the learning process.
(__)Speaking skills should be delayed until the student has memorized all the grammar rules of the language perfectly.
(__)Writing activities should always focus on copying sentences from the board to ensure correct spelling, avoiding creative production.
Mark the alternative that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC - Professor Inglês |
Q3791615
Inglês
Interdisciplinarity in English teaching encourages
connections between the language and other curricular
areas. An effective pedagogical resource to promote this
connection would be:
Resumos relacionados
Resumo relacionado
Advérbios e conjunções em inglês para concursos públicos
O estudo de advérbios e conjunções na língua inglesa é fundamental para quem deseja se destacar em provas de concursos públicos. Esses elementos desempenham papéis essenciais na construção de frases, influenciando diretamente o sentido e a coesão textual, habilidades bastante exigidas nas questões de interpretação e compreensão de textos em inglês.
Resumo relacionado
Artigos (Articles) em inglês: uso em concursos públicos
Artigos (Articles) são palavras essenciais na gramática da língua inglesa, usadas para indicar se um substantivo está sendo mencionado de forma específica ou geral. Eles desempenham papel fundamental em provas de concursos, pois ajudam na compreensão e interpretação dos textos, além de serem frequentemente cobrados em questões envolvendo uso correto de estruturas gramaticais.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC - Professor Inglês |
Q3791612
Inglês
Throughout the history of English teaching in Brazil,
different methods have been adopted, reflecting the
educational theories of each period. Mark T (True) or F
(False) for the statements regarding these
methodologies:
(__)The Grammar-Translation Method focused on reading and writing literary texts, using the native language to explain grammatical rules deductively.
(__)The Audio-Lingual Method was based on Behaviorism and emphasized oral skills through the repetition of drills to form linguistic habits.
(__)The Communicative Approach shifted the focus from grammatical form to the negotiation of meaning and social interaction in authentic contexts.
(__)The Instrumental Approach (ESP - English for Specific Purposes) became popular in the 1980s with a focus on developing reading strategies for academic and technical purposes.
Mark the alternative that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
(__)The Grammar-Translation Method focused on reading and writing literary texts, using the native language to explain grammatical rules deductively.
(__)The Audio-Lingual Method was based on Behaviorism and emphasized oral skills through the repetition of drills to form linguistic habits.
(__)The Communicative Approach shifted the focus from grammatical form to the negotiation of meaning and social interaction in authentic contexts.
(__)The Instrumental Approach (ESP - English for Specific Purposes) became popular in the 1980s with a focus on developing reading strategies for academic and technical purposes.
Mark the alternative that shows the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
Unesc
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC
Prova:
Unesc - 2025 - Prefeitura de Jaguaruna - SC - Professor Inglês |
Q3791611
Inglês
The National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) defines
the status of the English language in the Brazilian
curriculum not merely as a foreign language, but as a
Lingua Franca. This perspective implies that the primary
goal of teaching English in Brazil is to:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790628
Inglês
Em narrativas contemporâneas, a fusão entre voz
narrativa e consciência da personagem, sem marcas
explícitas de citação, caracteriza:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790627
Inglês
Considere o enunciado:
The policy will significantly reshape how teachers evaluate multimodal assignments.
O advérbio significantly tem escopo sobre:
The policy will significantly reshape how teachers evaluate multimodal assignments.
O advérbio significantly tem escopo sobre:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790626
Inglês
No período She revised the draft thoroughly, whereas
the committee moved on without further discussion, a
conjunção whereas estabelece relação de:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790625
Inglês
Assinale a alternativa em que a preposição responde
adequadamente às restrições lexicais do verbo:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790624
Inglês
Considere a frase: The teacher’s mentors’ feedback
was incorporated into the final proposal. A construção
indica:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790623
Inglês
No contexto de um relatório acadêmico sobre evasão
escolar, o enunciado Researchers are still trying to pin
down the variables that intensify dropout rates emprega
pin down com o sentido de:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790622
Inglês
Ao analisar a frase By next semester, the school will
have been implementing the new curriculum for two
years, o professor deve reconhecer que o tempo verbal
expressa:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790621
Inglês
Em um texto regulatório, a sentença Teachers must
report any incident within 24 hours expressa:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790620
Inglês
Leia o trecho:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790619
Inglês
Um texto produzido por uma ONG internacional
combina: (1) dados estatísticos, (2) depoimentos de
comunidades vulneráveis, (3) infográficos interativos e
(4) recomendações políticas dirigidas a governos. A
classificação adequada, considerando função social e
composição discursiva, é:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790616
Inglês
Considerando que a BNCC concebe o inglês como
prática de linguagem atravessada por
multiletramentos, assinale a alternativa que melhor
traduz essa concepção, entendendo-a como
articulação entre repertórios culturais, modos de
significação e participação social.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790615
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
In the third paragraph, the author suggests that AI
invites us to confront, with uncomfortable clarity, the
parts of ourselves we outsource. Considering the
metaphorical structure and the argumentative
movement of the text as a whole, the most accurate
interpretation is that this statement:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790614
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
From a global reading of the text, one may infer that the
author views the human–AI relationship as:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790613
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
Which interpretation most closely aligns with the
central argument of the final paragraph?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2025 - Prefeitura de Piracuruca - PI - Professor de Língua inglesa |
Q3790612
Inglês
Texto associado
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine
Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few
insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the
buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without
asking for permission.
Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their
routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation
does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that
once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make
the decisions that matter.
Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so
much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system
trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI
does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.
And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to
AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely,
the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in
the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still
very much alive.
What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s
daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And
perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but
by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next.
In the third paragraph, the author states that AI mirrors
human beings. In context, this metaphor implies that:
Conheça nossos planos