Questões de Concurso Comentadas por alunos sobre tradução | translation em inglês
Foram encontradas 340 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2024
Banca:
LJ Assessoria e Planejamento Administrativo Limita
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Turilândia - MA
Prova:
LJ Assessoria e Planejamento Administrativo Limita - 2024 - Prefeitura de Turilândia - MA - Professor de Inglês |
Q2357764
Inglês
Marque a alternativa que corresponde à tradução da frase abaixo.
O SUPER HOMEM SALVOU A VIDA DAQUELA
MULHER ONTEM.
Ano: 2023
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Pombos - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2023 - Prefeitura de Pombos - PE - Analista de Sistemas |
Q2321429
Inglês
Nowadays, in most modern societies, almost everybody
has an idea about what a computer is. We depend on
computers in every aspect of our lives whether we know
how to use one or not.
Ano: 2023
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Dona Inês - PB
Prova:
CPCON - 2023 - Prefeitura de Dona Inês - PB - Professor B - Nível - 1 (Licenciatura em Inglês) |
Q2273311
Inglês
Texto associado
TEXT III – Tema: As novas tecnologias na sala de aula de Língua Inglesa
Is Technology Taking Over Classrooms?
(Available from: https://citedatthecrossroads.net/eng101f13/2013/10/27/is-technology-taking-over-classrooms/ Accessed on July 8th , 2023)
In Text III, the phrasal verb “to take over” means:
Ano: 2000
Banca:
ND
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Prova:
ND - 2000 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Técnica Legislativa - Conhecimentos Gerais |
Q2257136
Inglês
Texto associado
TEXT 3
In the continuation of Text 3, choose the option that best completes it to answer the question.
The _________ is Internet access. But low earth orbit satellites may soon change everything. With this revolutionary new technology, poor telephone communications will be a thing of the past and suddenly being rural won't matter.
Ano: 2006
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
BACEN
Prova:
FCC - 2006 - BACEN - Analista do Banco Central - Área 3 - Conhecimentos Específicos |
Q2254457
Inglês
Texto associado
Senate Passes Plan to Cut $35 Billion From Deficit
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 4, 2005; A01
The Senate approved sweeping deficit-reduction
legislation last night that would save about $35 billion over the
next five years by cutting federal spending on prescription drugs,
agriculture supports and student loans, while clamping down on
fraud in the Medicaid program.
The measure would also open Alaska's Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, a long-sought goal of the oil
industry that took a major step forward after years of political
struggle. A bipartisan effort to strip the drilling provision narrowly
failed.
The Senate bill, which passed 52 to 47, is the first in
nearly a decade to tackle the growth of entitlement spending, the
part of the federal budget that rises automatically based on set
formulas and population changes.
It would shave payments to some farmers by 2.5 percent,
while eliminating a major cotton support program and trimming
agriculture conservation spending. A proposal to limit payments
to rich farmers failed yesterday. The measure passed largely
along party lines, with only two Democrats voting for it and five
Republicans voting against it.
Yesterday's action is part of an effort by congressional
Republicans to demonstrate fiscal discipline after widespread
complaints of profligate spending on Capitol Hill. ....51.... many
Democrats and some moderate Republicans are concerned that
the effort may go too far, prominent Republicans in the Senate
and House said the cuts were necessary to slow the rate of
spending and control a deficit projected to total $314 billion by
the end of the fiscal year.
During a speech yesterday, former House majority leader
Tom Delay (R-Tex) repeatedly apologized for excessive
spending by Congress, including recent highway legislation that
was ....52.... with lawmakers’ pet projects. After noting that House
Republicans have voted to cut taxes every year since winning
the majority in 1994, DeLay acknowledged, “Our record on
spending has not been as consistent, ....53.... .”
(Adapted from washingtonpost.com)
Segundo o texto,