Questões de Concurso
Sobre inglês para fgv
Foram encontradas 1.047 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Q2758984
Inglês
Texto associado
Text I
Energy Transition in a Transnational World
Within the sphere of environmental law, the climate crisis is
increasingly understood to be an intersectional challenge that
implicates and exacerbates existing systemic challenges and
prevailing pathways of inequality. From this vantage point climate
change also creates opportunities for rethinking the role of law in
limiting the destructive impacts of climate change and moving
towards a more sustainable and equitable world in the process.
This view is advanced by the climate justice movement, which is
swelling in influence worldwide. Drawing from the environmental
justice movement, the climate justice movement exposes not only
how social and economic inequality has led to and perpetuates
patterns of climate change, but also how climate change deepens
inequality by disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable
members of society. Climate justice seeks greater emphasis on this
issue and advocates on the part of those most affected by climate
change. The movement envisions a world which simultaneously
curtails the negative effects of climate change and reshapes
existing social, political, and economic relationships along the way.
Amidst the overlapping crises of modern times, the modern
climate justice movement is reviving dialogue at the intersection of
feminism, environmentalism, social and economic justice, and other
progressive law reform movements, as well as creating the space
and momentum for intersectional ideas to flourish. For lawyers and
legal scholars, the opportunity is to see climate change and
environmental degradation within its broader social context and to
seize upon the rule of law as a powerful tool for change.
Nowhere are these intersecting challenges as acute as in the
context of energy. One of the principal aims of the climate justice
movement is to achieve a just and equitable transition from an
extractive economy to a regenerative economy. This requires
transitioning from fossil fuel-dependent to low and zero-carbon
economies. However, the pathways for overhauling energy
systems worldwide remain indeterminate. Energy systems are
evolving in response to a combination of law and policy changes,
developments in energy technologies, and market forces.
Moreover, given both the entrenched nature of fossil fuel
economies and the varied social, political, economic, and
environmental factors that shape energy transition, pathways to
decarbonization are bound to be beset with complex trade-offs,
such as those between energy security and environmental
objectives, or between energy choice and economies of scale. The
precise contours of these systemic changes vary from country to
country, and remain under-explored both within their national
contexts and from a broader transnational perspective. This
knowledge gap is critical. Understanding how, why, and to what
end states are restructuring their energy economies is essential for
transitioning to more environmentally sustainable and just
societies worldwide. In short, this is an area in need of
experimentation and iterative learning. It is a subject ripe for
greater scholarly focus, particularly at the transnational level,
where improved learning and sharing is indispensable for
achieving the global-level shifts needed to address climate change.
Adapted from: Etty, Thijs et al. “Energy Transition in a Transnational World.”
Transnational Environmental Law 10.2 (2021): 197–204. Available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transnational-environmentallaw/article/energy-transition-in-a-transnationalworld/9F9D4229588B39C0E5916DFBE82EA046
The verb in “curtails the negative effects” (1st paragraph)
means to
Q2758983
Inglês
Texto associado
Text I
Energy Transition in a Transnational World
Within the sphere of environmental law, the climate crisis is
increasingly understood to be an intersectional challenge that
implicates and exacerbates existing systemic challenges and
prevailing pathways of inequality. From this vantage point climate
change also creates opportunities for rethinking the role of law in
limiting the destructive impacts of climate change and moving
towards a more sustainable and equitable world in the process.
This view is advanced by the climate justice movement, which is
swelling in influence worldwide. Drawing from the environmental
justice movement, the climate justice movement exposes not only
how social and economic inequality has led to and perpetuates
patterns of climate change, but also how climate change deepens
inequality by disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable
members of society. Climate justice seeks greater emphasis on this
issue and advocates on the part of those most affected by climate
change. The movement envisions a world which simultaneously
curtails the negative effects of climate change and reshapes
existing social, political, and economic relationships along the way.
Amidst the overlapping crises of modern times, the modern
climate justice movement is reviving dialogue at the intersection of
feminism, environmentalism, social and economic justice, and other
progressive law reform movements, as well as creating the space
and momentum for intersectional ideas to flourish. For lawyers and
legal scholars, the opportunity is to see climate change and
environmental degradation within its broader social context and to
seize upon the rule of law as a powerful tool for change.
Nowhere are these intersecting challenges as acute as in the
context of energy. One of the principal aims of the climate justice
movement is to achieve a just and equitable transition from an
extractive economy to a regenerative economy. This requires
transitioning from fossil fuel-dependent to low and zero-carbon
economies. However, the pathways for overhauling energy
systems worldwide remain indeterminate. Energy systems are
evolving in response to a combination of law and policy changes,
developments in energy technologies, and market forces.
Moreover, given both the entrenched nature of fossil fuel
economies and the varied social, political, economic, and
environmental factors that shape energy transition, pathways to
decarbonization are bound to be beset with complex trade-offs,
such as those between energy security and environmental
objectives, or between energy choice and economies of scale. The
precise contours of these systemic changes vary from country to
country, and remain under-explored both within their national
contexts and from a broader transnational perspective. This
knowledge gap is critical. Understanding how, why, and to what
end states are restructuring their energy economies is essential for
transitioning to more environmentally sustainable and just
societies worldwide. In short, this is an area in need of
experimentation and iterative learning. It is a subject ripe for
greater scholarly focus, particularly at the transnational level,
where improved learning and sharing is indispensable for
achieving the global-level shifts needed to address climate change.
Adapted from: Etty, Thijs et al. “Energy Transition in a Transnational World.”
Transnational Environmental Law 10.2 (2021): 197–204. Available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transnational-environmentallaw/article/energy-transition-in-a-transnationalworld/9F9D4229588B39C0E5916DFBE82EA046
According to the text, the influence of climate justice movement
at present is
Q2758982
Inglês
Texto associado
Text I
Energy Transition in a Transnational World
Within the sphere of environmental law, the climate crisis is
increasingly understood to be an intersectional challenge that
implicates and exacerbates existing systemic challenges and
prevailing pathways of inequality. From this vantage point climate
change also creates opportunities for rethinking the role of law in
limiting the destructive impacts of climate change and moving
towards a more sustainable and equitable world in the process.
This view is advanced by the climate justice movement, which is
swelling in influence worldwide. Drawing from the environmental
justice movement, the climate justice movement exposes not only
how social and economic inequality has led to and perpetuates
patterns of climate change, but also how climate change deepens
inequality by disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable
members of society. Climate justice seeks greater emphasis on this
issue and advocates on the part of those most affected by climate
change. The movement envisions a world which simultaneously
curtails the negative effects of climate change and reshapes
existing social, political, and economic relationships along the way.
Amidst the overlapping crises of modern times, the modern
climate justice movement is reviving dialogue at the intersection of
feminism, environmentalism, social and economic justice, and other
progressive law reform movements, as well as creating the space
and momentum for intersectional ideas to flourish. For lawyers and
legal scholars, the opportunity is to see climate change and
environmental degradation within its broader social context and to
seize upon the rule of law as a powerful tool for change.
Nowhere are these intersecting challenges as acute as in the
context of energy. One of the principal aims of the climate justice
movement is to achieve a just and equitable transition from an
extractive economy to a regenerative economy. This requires
transitioning from fossil fuel-dependent to low and zero-carbon
economies. However, the pathways for overhauling energy
systems worldwide remain indeterminate. Energy systems are
evolving in response to a combination of law and policy changes,
developments in energy technologies, and market forces.
Moreover, given both the entrenched nature of fossil fuel
economies and the varied social, political, economic, and
environmental factors that shape energy transition, pathways to
decarbonization are bound to be beset with complex trade-offs,
such as those between energy security and environmental
objectives, or between energy choice and economies of scale. The
precise contours of these systemic changes vary from country to
country, and remain under-explored both within their national
contexts and from a broader transnational perspective. This
knowledge gap is critical. Understanding how, why, and to what
end states are restructuring their energy economies is essential for
transitioning to more environmentally sustainable and just
societies worldwide. In short, this is an area in need of
experimentation and iterative learning. It is a subject ripe for
greater scholarly focus, particularly at the transnational level,
where improved learning and sharing is indispensable for
achieving the global-level shifts needed to address climate change.
Adapted from: Etty, Thijs et al. “Energy Transition in a Transnational World.”
Transnational Environmental Law 10.2 (2021): 197–204. Available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transnational-environmentallaw/article/energy-transition-in-a-transnationalworld/9F9D4229588B39C0E5916DFBE82EA046
Analyse the statements below based on the text.
I. Climate justice supports the view that populations in disadvantage are impervious to the effects of climate change.
II. Efforts to link up with different movements are being expended by modern climate justice.
III. A keen understanding of how to revamp energy systems on a global scale has been achieved.
Choose the correct answer:
I. Climate justice supports the view that populations in disadvantage are impervious to the effects of climate change.
II. Efforts to link up with different movements are being expended by modern climate justice.
III. A keen understanding of how to revamp energy systems on a global scale has been achieved.
Choose the correct answer:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517170
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The text ends in a note of
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517169
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The word “roughly” in “Over the past roughly 50,000 years” (5th
paragraph) indicates a(n)
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517168
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
According to the text, the word that “this extraordinary gift” (5th
paragraph) refers to is our
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517167
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The opposite of “the smartest” (4th paragraph) is
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517166
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
In the second paragraph, “on the flip side” means
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517165
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The expression “such as” in “such as climate change” (2nd
paragraph) can be replaced without significant change in meaning
by
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517164
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The first sentence presents a
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517163
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE
(F):
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459395
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text V and answer the six questions that follow it:
Text V
Adapted from: https://donalclancy.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/margaret-walker.jpg
From: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53463/lineage
The noun in “They were full of sturdiness” refers to the
grandmothers’
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459394
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text V and answer the six questions that follow it:
Text V
Adapted from: https://donalclancy.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/margaret-walker.jpg
From: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53463/lineage
The last line of the poem reveals the poet’s
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459393
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text V and answer the six questions that follow it:
Text V
Adapted from: https://donalclancy.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/margaret-walker.jpg
From: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53463/lineage
The device the first stanza uses for effect is
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459392
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text V and answer the six questions that follow it:
Text V
Adapted from: https://donalclancy.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/margaret-walker.jpg
From: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53463/lineage
The first stanza indicates that the poet’s grandmothers worked
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459391
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text V and answer the six questions that follow it:
Text V
Adapted from: https://donalclancy.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/margaret-walker.jpg
From: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53463/lineage
The poet’s view of her grandmothers is one of
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459390
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text V and answer the six questions that follow it:
Text V
Adapted from: https://donalclancy.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/margaret-walker.jpg
From: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53463/lineage
Analyse the assertions below based on the poem:
I. The poet reflects on her ancestors’ attitude towards life.
II. The first stanza can be used as an example of resilience.
III. The poem focuses on the problem of religious difference.
Choose the correct answer:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459389
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text IV and answer the three questions that follow it:
Text IV
Adapted from: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1294646317355834&set
=a.915379355282534
The simple past and the past participle of the verb “split” in “split
bills” are formed in the same way as in
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459388
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text IV and answer the three questions that follow it:
Text IV
Adapted from: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1294646317355834&set
=a.915379355282534
The function of “really” in “Do you really split bills [..]” is to
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Vitória - ES
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - Prefeitura de Vitória - ES - PEB III - Língua Inglesa |
Q2459387
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text IV and answer the three questions that follow it:
Text IV
Adapted from: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1294646317355834&set
=a.915379355282534
The aim of this comic strip is to
Conheça nossos planos
