Questões de Concurso Público SEDUC-SP 2025 para Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023
Foram encontradas 29 questões
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529148
Pedagogia
Leia o texto para responder esta questão:
Assim, a área incorpora também a visão de multiletramentos, abraçando práticas sociais contemporâneas que contemplam novas possibilidades de participação e de circulação, articulando diferentes semioses e linguagens.
(SÃO PAULO [Estado]. Secretaria da Educação. Currículo Paulista. São Paulo: SEDUC, 2019)
Com base na concepção de multiletramentos e na articulação de diferentes semioses e linguagens, assinale a alternativa que melhor exemplifica uma proposta pedagógica coerente com esse paradigma para alunos de Ensino Fundamental – Anos Finais.
Assim, a área incorpora também a visão de multiletramentos, abraçando práticas sociais contemporâneas que contemplam novas possibilidades de participação e de circulação, articulando diferentes semioses e linguagens.
(SÃO PAULO [Estado]. Secretaria da Educação. Currículo Paulista. São Paulo: SEDUC, 2019)
Com base na concepção de multiletramentos e na articulação de diferentes semioses e linguagens, assinale a alternativa que melhor exemplifica uma proposta pedagógica coerente com esse paradigma para alunos de Ensino Fundamental – Anos Finais.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529157
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Leia o texto para responder à questão:
Entretanto, há ainda muitos questionamentos sobre o uso
crítico de tecnologias nas metodologias de ensino de inglês.
Diante do exposto, este trabalho se propõe a apresentar uma
breve retrospectiva histórica das principais metodologias que
se sucederam e em alguns momentos coexistiram no e para
o ensino de inglês, com o objetivo de discutir de que forma(s)
algumas dessas metodologias usaram ou se apropriaram das
tecnologias (e em alguns casos ainda o fazem ou podem fazer) para alcançar seus objetivos de ensino, e, ainda, refletir
sucintamente sobre as implicações desses usos e apropriações das tecnologias para o ensino de inglês como língua
internacional num cenário globalizado e cada vez mais internacionalizado, no caso do ensino superior.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca.; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. Tecnologia e
metodologia no ensino de inglês: impactos da globalização e da
internacionalização. Ilha do Desterro, Florianópolis, UFSC, n. 66, 2014)
De acordo com o trecho apresentado, o principal objetivo
do trabalho mencionado é
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529158
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Leia o texto para responder à questão:
Entretanto, há ainda muitos questionamentos sobre o uso
crítico de tecnologias nas metodologias de ensino de inglês.
Diante do exposto, este trabalho se propõe a apresentar uma
breve retrospectiva histórica das principais metodologias que
se sucederam e em alguns momentos coexistiram no e para
o ensino de inglês, com o objetivo de discutir de que forma(s)
algumas dessas metodologias usaram ou se apropriaram das
tecnologias (e em alguns casos ainda o fazem ou podem fazer) para alcançar seus objetivos de ensino, e, ainda, refletir
sucintamente sobre as implicações desses usos e apropriações das tecnologias para o ensino de inglês como língua
internacional num cenário globalizado e cada vez mais internacionalizado, no caso do ensino superior.
(FINARDI, Kyria Rebecca.; PORCINO, Maria Carolina. Tecnologia e
metodologia no ensino de inglês: impactos da globalização e da
internacionalização. Ilha do Desterro, Florianópolis, UFSC, n. 66, 2014)
Com base no trecho apresentado, qual das afirmações
a seguir melhor expressa a relação entre abordagens
de ensino de inglês e o uso de tecnologias, conforme discutido no trabalho?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529161
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question:
In foreign language education, the teaching of culture
remains a hotly debated issue. What is culture? What is its
relation to language? Which and whose culture should be
taught? What role should the learners’ culture play in the
acquisition of knowledge of the target culture? How can
we avoid essentializing cultures and teaching stereotypes?
And how can we develop in the learners an intercultural
competence that would shortchange neither their own culture
nor the target culture, but would make them into cultural
mediators in a globalized world? This paper explores these
issues from the perspective of the large body of research
done in Australia, Europe and the U.S. in the last twenty
years. It links the study of culture to the study of discourse
(see, e.g., Kramsch 1993, 1998, 2004) and to the concept
of translingual and transcultural competence proposed by the Modern Language Association (e.g., Kramsch, 2010). Special
attention will be given to the unique role that the age-old
Persian culture can play in fostering the cultural mediators of
tomorrow.
(KRAMASCH, Claire. Cultura no ensino de língua estrangeira.
Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, São Paulo,
LAEL/PUC-SP, v. 19, n. 4, 2024)
Ao discutir o ensino de cultura no ensino de línguas estrangeiras, o trecho aproxima-se de abordagens, tais
como
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529166
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question:
Today, many of the pedagogical springs and rivers of
the last few decades are appropriately captured in the term
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), now a catch
phrase for language teachers. CLT is an eclectic blend of
the contributions of previous methods into the best of what a
teacher can provide in authentic uses of the second language
in the classroom. Indeed, the single greatest challenge in
the profession is to move significantly beyond the teaching
of rules, patterns, definitions, and other knowledge “about”
language to the point that we are teaching our students to
communicate genuinely, spontaneously, and meaningfully in
the second language.
A significant difference between current language
teaching practices and those of, say, a half a century ago, is
the absence of proclaimed “orthodoxies” and “best” methods.
We are well aware that methods, as they were conceived of
40 or 50 years ago or so, are too narrow and too constrictive
to apply to a wide range of learners in an enormous number
of situational contexts. There are no instant recipes. No
quick and easy method is guaranteed to provide success.
As Bell (2003), Brown (2001), Kumaravadivelu (2001),
and others have appropriately shown, pedagogical trends
in language teaching now spur us to develop a principled
basis—sometimes called an approach (Richards & Rodgers,
2001)—upon which teachers can choose particular designs
and techniques for teaching a foreign language in a specific
context. Every learner is unique. Every teacher is unique.
Every learner-teacher relationship is unique, and every
context is unique. Your task as a teacher is to understand the
properties of those relationships and contexts.
(BROWN, H. Douglas. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5. ed.
Londres: Longman, 2006)
According to the text, how has the concept of
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) reshaped
modern language teaching practices compared to
traditional methods?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529167
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question:
Today, many of the pedagogical springs and rivers of
the last few decades are appropriately captured in the term
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), now a catch
phrase for language teachers. CLT is an eclectic blend of
the contributions of previous methods into the best of what a
teacher can provide in authentic uses of the second language
in the classroom. Indeed, the single greatest challenge in
the profession is to move significantly beyond the teaching
of rules, patterns, definitions, and other knowledge “about”
language to the point that we are teaching our students to
communicate genuinely, spontaneously, and meaningfully in
the second language.
A significant difference between current language
teaching practices and those of, say, a half a century ago, is
the absence of proclaimed “orthodoxies” and “best” methods.
We are well aware that methods, as they were conceived of
40 or 50 years ago or so, are too narrow and too constrictive
to apply to a wide range of learners in an enormous number
of situational contexts. There are no instant recipes. No
quick and easy method is guaranteed to provide success.
As Bell (2003), Brown (2001), Kumaravadivelu (2001),
and others have appropriately shown, pedagogical trends
in language teaching now spur us to develop a principled
basis—sometimes called an approach (Richards & Rodgers,
2001)—upon which teachers can choose particular designs
and techniques for teaching a foreign language in a specific
context. Every learner is unique. Every teacher is unique.
Every learner-teacher relationship is unique, and every
context is unique. Your task as a teacher is to understand the
properties of those relationships and contexts.
(BROWN, H. Douglas. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5. ed.
Londres: Longman, 2006)
De acordo com o segundo parágrafo, uma implicação
fundamental da rejeição das “ortodoxias” e “melhores
métodos”, no ensino de línguas atualmente, é o seguinte:
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529169
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question:
Today, many of the pedagogical springs and rivers of
the last few decades are appropriately captured in the term
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), now a catch
phrase for language teachers. CLT is an eclectic blend of
the contributions of previous methods into the best of what a
teacher can provide in authentic uses of the second language
in the classroom. Indeed, the single greatest challenge in
the profession is to move significantly beyond the teaching
of rules, patterns, definitions, and other knowledge “about”
language to the point that we are teaching our students to
communicate genuinely, spontaneously, and meaningfully in
the second language.
A significant difference between current language
teaching practices and those of, say, a half a century ago, is
the absence of proclaimed “orthodoxies” and “best” methods.
We are well aware that methods, as they were conceived of
40 or 50 years ago or so, are too narrow and too constrictive
to apply to a wide range of learners in an enormous number
of situational contexts. There are no instant recipes. No
quick and easy method is guaranteed to provide success.
As Bell (2003), Brown (2001), Kumaravadivelu (2001),
and others have appropriately shown, pedagogical trends
in language teaching now spur us to develop a principled
basis—sometimes called an approach (Richards & Rodgers,
2001)—upon which teachers can choose particular designs
and techniques for teaching a foreign language in a specific
context. Every learner is unique. Every teacher is unique.
Every learner-teacher relationship is unique, and every
context is unique. Your task as a teacher is to understand the
properties of those relationships and contexts.
(BROWN, H. Douglas. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5. ed.
Londres: Longman, 2006)
What central role is assigned to the teacher in modern
language teaching, according to the views expressed in
the text?
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529172
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question:
Today, many of the pedagogical springs and rivers of
the last few decades are appropriately captured in the term
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), now a catch
phrase for language teachers. CLT is an eclectic blend of
the contributions of previous methods into the best of what a
teacher can provide in authentic uses of the second language
in the classroom. Indeed, the single greatest challenge in
the profession is to move significantly beyond the teaching
of rules, patterns, definitions, and other knowledge “about”
language to the point that we are teaching our students to
communicate genuinely, spontaneously, and meaningfully in
the second language.
A significant difference between current language
teaching practices and those of, say, a half a century ago, is
the absence of proclaimed “orthodoxies” and “best” methods.
We are well aware that methods, as they were conceived of
40 or 50 years ago or so, are too narrow and too constrictive
to apply to a wide range of learners in an enormous number
of situational contexts. There are no instant recipes. No
quick and easy method is guaranteed to provide success.
As Bell (2003), Brown (2001), Kumaravadivelu (2001),
and others have appropriately shown, pedagogical trends
in language teaching now spur us to develop a principled
basis—sometimes called an approach (Richards & Rodgers,
2001)—upon which teachers can choose particular designs
and techniques for teaching a foreign language in a specific
context. Every learner is unique. Every teacher is unique.
Every learner-teacher relationship is unique, and every
context is unique. Your task as a teacher is to understand the
properties of those relationships and contexts.
(BROWN, H. Douglas. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5. ed.
Londres: Longman, 2006)
Considerando os princípios da abordagem comunicativa de ensino de línguas discutidos no texto, assinale a
alternativa que representa a forma mais coerente de um
professor lidar com um erro de pronúncia cometido por
um aluno durante uma atividade de fala espontânea.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
VUNESP
Órgão:
SEDUC-SP
Prova:
VUNESP - 2025 - SEDUC-SP - Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês - QM 2023 |
Q3529176
Pedagogia
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
All teachers, whether at the start of their careers or
after some years of teaching, need to be able to try out new
activities and techniques. It is important to be open to such
new ideas and take them into the classroom.
But such experimentation will be of little use unless we
can then evaluate these activities. Were they successful? Did
the students enjoy them? Did they learn anything from them?
How could the activities be changed to make them more
effective next time?
One way of getting feedback is to ask students simple
questions such as ‘Did you like that exercise? Did you find
it useful?’ and see what they say. But not all students will
discuss topics like this openly in class. It may be better to ask
them to write their answers down and hand them in.
Another way of getting reactions to new techniques is to
invite a colleague into the classroom and ask him or her to
observe what happens and make suggestions afterwards.
The lesson could also be videoed.
In general, it is a good idea to get students’ reactions
to lessons, and their aspirations about them, clearly stated.
Many teachers encourage students to say what they feel
about the lessons and how they think the course is going. The
simplest way to do this is to ask students once every fortnight,
for example, to write down two things they want more of and
two things they want less of. The answers you get may prove
a fruitful place to start a discussion, and you will then be able
to modify what happens in class, if you think it appropriate,
in the light of your students’ feelings. Such modifications will
greatly enhance the teacher’s ability to manage the class.
Good teacher managers also need to assess how well
their students are progressing. This can be done through
a variety of measures including homework assignments,
speaking activities where the teacher scores the participation
of each student, and frequent small progress tests. Good
teachers keep a record of their students’ achievements so
that they are always aware of how they are getting on. Only
if teachers keep such kinds of progress records can they
begin to see when teaching and learning has or has not been
successful.
(Harmer, Jeremy. How to teach English. Londres: Longman, 1998)
De acordo com o texto, assinale a alternativa que representa a abordagem mais abrangente e eficaz para avaliar
a eficácia de novas atividades em sala de aula de inglês
como língua estrangeira.
Conheça nossos planos