Questões de Concurso Público Prefeitura de Silveira Martins - RS 2026 para Professor de Inglês

Foram encontradas 7 questões

Q4324605 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

Based on a rigorous critical appraisal of the text's argumentative framework and logical progression, analyze the assertions below:



I. The OODA decision-making loop functions as a permanent, static mechanism where a single isolated action definitively concludes the operational cycle.


II. The author draws a direct analogy to assert that clearing away messes for which one bears no direct responsibility is a routine, inescapable reality of existence.


III. The author warns that prioritizing extreme caution while waiting to craft a flawless blueprint can deteriorate into counterproductive procrastination. 



Which of the following statements islare CORRECT?

Alternativas
Q4324607 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

Analyze the sentence below:



If you _______ to become a millionaire, you _________ to develop a plan that accounts for realíty, rather than just comp/aining.



Choose the alternative that CORRECTLY completes the logic of the millionaire analogy.

Alternativas
Q4324608 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

Analyze the sentence below



Once an action ________, it _________feedback that ________ the next deciston.



Regarding this, select the sequence that CORRECTLY fills the blanks in this OODA loop description.

Alternativas
Q4324610 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

Identify the sentence that CORRECTLY uses a relative clause and maintains proper subject-verb agreement. 
Alternativas
Q4324611 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

Analyze the sentence below:



Instead of waiting _________ the perfect strategy you should act ________ an imperíect one and reorient based ________ the results.



Which combination CORRECTLY completes the following summary of the author's advice? 

Alternativas
Q4324612 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

Consider the sentence of the seventh paragraph Mistakes were made. Regarding this, why does the author likely use the passive voice here instead of the active voice?
Alternativas
Q4324613 Inglês

Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.



How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?



    A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.

    The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.

    A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.

    No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."

    That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.

    Many of the problems we face today took years to create.

    We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.

    But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.

    Some messes only require a dustpan.

    But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.



Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart

If the author were to report the complaints mentioned in the text, which transformation would be MOST accurate? 
Alternativas
Respostas
1: E
2: B
3: A
4: D
5: B
6: C
7: C