Questões de Concurso Público Câmara dos Deputados 2026 para Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026
Foram encontradas 10 questões
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932495
Inglês
Texto associado
Little attention has been devoted to legislation’s point of
origin — the legislative drafting process. Such commentary as
has been offered is essentially technical in nature. However, the
relationship between drafter and text is the furthest thing from a
technical, value-neutral enterprise.
For example: a question confronted by every drafter and
one with obvious ethical and political implications is, “How
much is to be left to the drafter’s discretion?” Obviously, the
drafter who less frequently inquires about the client’s desires will
have greater latitude to exercise discretion and accordingly can
play more of an “advocacy” role in shaping the legislation, a
situation which can lead to his or her sidesteping the duty of
abiding by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of
representation.
But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait of
legislative drafting personnel. They are not a fifth column of
subversives who pursue personal advocacy objectives in
everything that they do. Indeed, many may even be unaware of
their power. They are, though, continually called upon to exercise
personal judgment in the performance of their duties. Such
judgments are frequently policy judgments, and drafting
decisions are often influenced consciously or subconsciously by
the advocacy agenda of the individual drafter. The legislative
drafter plays a more active role in the process than is generally
accorded to the stereotypical scribe, laboring in nameless and
faceless obscurity to produce a bill draft.
David Marcello. The Ethics and Politics of Legislative Drafting.
In: Tulane Law Review, vol. 70, p. 2437, 1996 (adapted).
About the preceding text, judge the following item.
The fragment of a sentence “greater latitude to exercise discretion” (second sentence of the second paragraph) can be, without this changing the original meaning of the text, replaced with greater possibilities to be discreet.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932496
Inglês
Texto associado
Little attention has been devoted to legislation’s point of
origin — the legislative drafting process. Such commentary as
has been offered is essentially technical in nature. However, the
relationship between drafter and text is the furthest thing from a
technical, value-neutral enterprise.
For example: a question confronted by every drafter and
one with obvious ethical and political implications is, “How
much is to be left to the drafter’s discretion?” Obviously, the
drafter who less frequently inquires about the client’s desires will
have greater latitude to exercise discretion and accordingly can
play more of an “advocacy” role in shaping the legislation, a
situation which can lead to his or her sidesteping the duty of
abiding by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of
representation.
But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait of
legislative drafting personnel. They are not a fifth column of
subversives who pursue personal advocacy objectives in
everything that they do. Indeed, many may even be unaware of
their power. They are, though, continually called upon to exercise
personal judgment in the performance of their duties. Such
judgments are frequently policy judgments, and drafting
decisions are often influenced consciously or subconsciously by
the advocacy agenda of the individual drafter. The legislative
drafter plays a more active role in the process than is generally
accorded to the stereotypical scribe, laboring in nameless and
faceless obscurity to produce a bill draft.
David Marcello. The Ethics and Politics of Legislative Drafting.
In: Tulane Law Review, vol. 70, p. 2437, 1996 (adapted).
About the preceding text, judge the following item.
In “But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait” (first sentence of the third paragraph), “this” does not refer to a specific previous word, but to the entire statement made in the second paragraph.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932497
Inglês
Texto associado
Little attention has been devoted to legislation’s point of
origin — the legislative drafting process. Such commentary as
has been offered is essentially technical in nature. However, the
relationship between drafter and text is the furthest thing from a
technical, value-neutral enterprise.
For example: a question confronted by every drafter and
one with obvious ethical and political implications is, “How
much is to be left to the drafter’s discretion?” Obviously, the
drafter who less frequently inquires about the client’s desires will
have greater latitude to exercise discretion and accordingly can
play more of an “advocacy” role in shaping the legislation, a
situation which can lead to his or her sidesteping the duty of
abiding by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of
representation.
But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait of
legislative drafting personnel. They are not a fifth column of
subversives who pursue personal advocacy objectives in
everything that they do. Indeed, many may even be unaware of
their power. They are, though, continually called upon to exercise
personal judgment in the performance of their duties. Such
judgments are frequently policy judgments, and drafting
decisions are often influenced consciously or subconsciously by
the advocacy agenda of the individual drafter. The legislative
drafter plays a more active role in the process than is generally
accorded to the stereotypical scribe, laboring in nameless and
faceless obscurity to produce a bill draft.
David Marcello. The Ethics and Politics of Legislative Drafting.
In: Tulane Law Review, vol. 70, p. 2437, 1996 (adapted).
About the preceding text, judge the following item.
The text confronts the idea of neutrality of those whose work is to write texts that may become law.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932498
Inglês
Texto associado
Little attention has been devoted to legislation’s point of
origin — the legislative drafting process. Such commentary as
has been offered is essentially technical in nature. However, the
relationship between drafter and text is the furthest thing from a
technical, value-neutral enterprise.
For example: a question confronted by every drafter and
one with obvious ethical and political implications is, “How
much is to be left to the drafter’s discretion?” Obviously, the
drafter who less frequently inquires about the client’s desires will
have greater latitude to exercise discretion and accordingly can
play more of an “advocacy” role in shaping the legislation, a
situation which can lead to his or her sidesteping the duty of
abiding by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of
representation.
But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait of
legislative drafting personnel. They are not a fifth column of
subversives who pursue personal advocacy objectives in
everything that they do. Indeed, many may even be unaware of
their power. They are, though, continually called upon to exercise
personal judgment in the performance of their duties. Such
judgments are frequently policy judgments, and drafting
decisions are often influenced consciously or subconsciously by
the advocacy agenda of the individual drafter. The legislative
drafter plays a more active role in the process than is generally
accorded to the stereotypical scribe, laboring in nameless and
faceless obscurity to produce a bill draft.
David Marcello. The Ethics and Politics of Legislative Drafting.
In: Tulane Law Review, vol. 70, p. 2437, 1996 (adapted).
About the preceding text, judge the following item.
By using the expressions “‘advocacy’ role” (second sentence of the second paragraph) and “advocacy agenda” (forth sentence of the third paragraph), the author is referring specifically to people who have a degree in law and work in the legislative branch.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932499
Inglês
Texto associado
Little attention has been devoted to legislation’s point of
origin — the legislative drafting process. Such commentary as
has been offered is essentially technical in nature. However, the
relationship between drafter and text is the furthest thing from a
technical, value-neutral enterprise.
For example: a question confronted by every drafter and
one with obvious ethical and political implications is, “How
much is to be left to the drafter’s discretion?” Obviously, the
drafter who less frequently inquires about the client’s desires will
have greater latitude to exercise discretion and accordingly can
play more of an “advocacy” role in shaping the legislation, a
situation which can lead to his or her sidesteping the duty of
abiding by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of
representation.
But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait of
legislative drafting personnel. They are not a fifth column of
subversives who pursue personal advocacy objectives in
everything that they do. Indeed, many may even be unaware of
their power. They are, though, continually called upon to exercise
personal judgment in the performance of their duties. Such
judgments are frequently policy judgments, and drafting
decisions are often influenced consciously or subconsciously by
the advocacy agenda of the individual drafter. The legislative
drafter plays a more active role in the process than is generally
accorded to the stereotypical scribe, laboring in nameless and
faceless obscurity to produce a bill draft.
David Marcello. The Ethics and Politics of Legislative Drafting.
In: Tulane Law Review, vol. 70, p. 2437, 1996 (adapted).
About the preceding text, judge the following item.
The main point of the text is to reveal how drafters can deliberately manipulate the drafting process according to their own interests.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932500
Inglês
Texto associado
Little attention has been devoted to legislation’s point of
origin — the legislative drafting process. Such commentary as
has been offered is essentially technical in nature. However, the
relationship between drafter and text is the furthest thing from a
technical, value-neutral enterprise.
For example: a question confronted by every drafter and
one with obvious ethical and political implications is, “How
much is to be left to the drafter’s discretion?” Obviously, the
drafter who less frequently inquires about the client’s desires will
have greater latitude to exercise discretion and accordingly can
play more of an “advocacy” role in shaping the legislation, a
situation which can lead to his or her sidesteping the duty of
abiding by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of
representation.
But this is not to paint too malevolent a portrait of
legislative drafting personnel. They are not a fifth column of
subversives who pursue personal advocacy objectives in
everything that they do. Indeed, many may even be unaware of
their power. They are, though, continually called upon to exercise
personal judgment in the performance of their duties. Such
judgments are frequently policy judgments, and drafting
decisions are often influenced consciously or subconsciously by
the advocacy agenda of the individual drafter. The legislative
drafter plays a more active role in the process than is generally
accorded to the stereotypical scribe, laboring in nameless and
faceless obscurity to produce a bill draft.
David Marcello. The Ethics and Politics of Legislative Drafting.
In: Tulane Law Review, vol. 70, p. 2437, 1996 (adapted).
About the preceding text, judge the following item.
It is correct to conclude from the first paragraph of the text that its author believes that not much has been explored about the true nature of legislative drafters’ work, which is not merely technical and impartial.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932501
Inglês
Texto associado
When conducting a survey on the use of technology in the
legislative process, one of the questions I asked was “Has the
legislature, as an institution or in part, resisted technology based
changes?” I asked this question based on my own experience
with the Massachusetts Legislature. I spent 9 years working with
legislators and senior staff, and the way they sometimes
approached technology was at times comical―at times
frightening. My friends and I watched on―and laughed―the
first time a laptop computer or an iPhone made its way onto the
floor of the Massachusetts House or Senate and the members
gathered around it, acting as though they were looking at an
artifact that had been dropped from Mars. I also saw an older
legislative drafter become befuddled and angry when he was
forced to start using the “track changes” and “comment”
functions on Microsoft Word rather than marking up a bill with
his beloved red pencil.
Sean J. Kealy. Technology & Legislative Drafting In The United States.
Internet:<sites.bu.edu> (adapted).
Judge the following item concerning the previous text.
The negative way some legislators reacted to technology sometimes scared the author of the text.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932502
Inglês
Texto associado
When conducting a survey on the use of technology in the
legislative process, one of the questions I asked was “Has the
legislature, as an institution or in part, resisted technology based
changes?” I asked this question based on my own experience
with the Massachusetts Legislature. I spent 9 years working with
legislators and senior staff, and the way they sometimes
approached technology was at times comical―at times
frightening. My friends and I watched on―and laughed―the
first time a laptop computer or an iPhone made its way onto the
floor of the Massachusetts House or Senate and the members
gathered around it, acting as though they were looking at an
artifact that had been dropped from Mars. I also saw an older
legislative drafter become befuddled and angry when he was
forced to start using the “track changes” and “comment”
functions on Microsoft Word rather than marking up a bill with
his beloved red pencil.
Sean J. Kealy. Technology & Legislative Drafting In The United States.
Internet:<sites.bu.edu> (adapted).
Judge the following item concerning the previous text.
The verb tense used in the survey question presented in the first sentence of the text indicates that there was no specific point in time respondents had to consider in their answers.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932503
Inglês
Texto associado
When conducting a survey on the use of technology in the
legislative process, one of the questions I asked was “Has the
legislature, as an institution or in part, resisted technology based
changes?” I asked this question based on my own experience
with the Massachusetts Legislature. I spent 9 years working with
legislators and senior staff, and the way they sometimes
approached technology was at times comical―at times
frightening. My friends and I watched on―and laughed―the
first time a laptop computer or an iPhone made its way onto the
floor of the Massachusetts House or Senate and the members
gathered around it, acting as though they were looking at an
artifact that had been dropped from Mars. I also saw an older
legislative drafter become befuddled and angry when he was
forced to start using the “track changes” and “comment”
functions on Microsoft Word rather than marking up a bill with
his beloved red pencil.
Sean J. Kealy. Technology & Legislative Drafting In The United States.
Internet:<sites.bu.edu> (adapted).
Judge the following item concerning the previous text.
When conducting his survey, the author met an older drafter who did not want to change the way he worked with bills and red pencils.
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Especialidade: Processo Legislativo e Gestão - Código: CD-AL- 011
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2026 - Câmara dos Deputados - Técnico Legislativo - Especialidade: Assistente Legislativo e Administrativo - Código: CD-AL- 026 |
Q3932504
Inglês
Texto associado
When conducting a survey on the use of technology in the
legislative process, one of the questions I asked was “Has the
legislature, as an institution or in part, resisted technology based
changes?” I asked this question based on my own experience
with the Massachusetts Legislature. I spent 9 years working with
legislators and senior staff, and the way they sometimes
approached technology was at times comical―at times
frightening. My friends and I watched on―and laughed―the
first time a laptop computer or an iPhone made its way onto the
floor of the Massachusetts House or Senate and the members
gathered around it, acting as though they were looking at an
artifact that had been dropped from Mars. I also saw an older
legislative drafter become befuddled and angry when he was
forced to start using the “track changes” and “comment”
functions on Microsoft Word rather than marking up a bill with
his beloved red pencil.
Sean J. Kealy. Technology & Legislative Drafting In The United States.
Internet:<sites.bu.edu> (adapted).
Judge the following item concerning the previous text.
In his text, the author shows his skepticism about the use of technology in the legislative process.
Conheça nossos planos