Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 25.478 questões
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Prova:
CESGRANRIO - 2010 - BR Distribuidora - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
Q119699
Inglês
The expression in bold type introduces a consequence in
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Prova:
CESGRANRIO - 2010 - BR Distribuidora - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
Q119698
Inglês
The pair of words that express opposing ideas is
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Prova:
CESGRANRIO - 2010 - BR Distribuidora - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
Q119697
Inglês
In the fragments “…people came up with all kinds of ideas for what to do with oil’s energy…” (lines 35-36) and “The amount of energy we get back from drilling oil wells…” (lines 45-46), the phrases “came up with” and “get back”, can be replaced without change in meaning by, respectively,
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Prova:
CESGRANRIO - 2010 - BR Distribuidora - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
Q119696
Inglês
According to Brian Black in paragraphs 3 (lines 12-19) and 13 (lines 70-72), energy transitions should be
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESGRANRIO
Órgão:
Petrobras
Prova:
CESGRANRIO - 2010 - BR Distribuidora - Profissional Júnior - Direito |
Q119695
Inglês
Alexis Madrigal comments that oil was
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
CODESP-SP
Prova:
FGV - 2010 - CODESP-SP - Analista de Sistemas - Tipo 1 |
Q116262
Inglês
In the passage intersect (line 22) means
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109423
Inglês
In the fragment “OIML members cover in total an astounding 86% of the world’s population” (L.13-15), the term “astounding” is synonymous with
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109422
Inglês
From the text, it can be concluded that
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109421
Inglês
It is correct to conclude from the text that
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109420
Inglês
According to what is stated in the text, choose the correct option.
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109419
Inglês
Texto associado
This text refers to questions from 16 through 19.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
Based on the text, one can infer that
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109418
Inglês
Texto associado
This text refers to questions from 16 through 19.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
According to the text, it can be deduced that
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109417
Inglês
Texto associado
This text refers to questions from 16 through 19.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
It can be concluded from the text that
Ano: 2010
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
INMETRO
Provas:
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Cargos de Nível Superior
|
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Analista Executivo em Metrologia e Qualidade - Avaliação da Conformidade |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista em Metrologia e Qualidade - Informática Aplicada à Metrologia Legal |
CESPE - 2010 - INMETRO - Pesquisador Tecnologista - Acreditação |
Q109416
Inglês
Texto associado
This text refers to questions from 16 through 19.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
In today’s society, measurements are used for many applications not only in industry and science but also in our daily life. There are measurements involved such as when buying petrol or foodstuff from the shop or energy from utilities; when trying to keep within the speed limits when driving your car; in health analyses when doctors diagnose and treat on the basis of blood pressure measurements; or when authorities make measurements to control the pollution in the air that we all breathe. Common to all these situations is that the measurement results need to be accepted (with confidence) by society. If not, the result is repeated measurements, disputes and legal actions. In most cases, the consumer or even the user of the measuring instrument does not personally have either the knowledge, the opportunity or the equipment to check whether the measurement that is so important for us is correct or not. In most countries, the legislature therefore has decided to set accuracy requirements for these types of measurements; most commonly, measurements in trade are regulated, but increasingly, also those within the health and environmental sectors.
Ongoing harmonization in Europe has become more and more the first reference point for authorities in the establishment of requirements for measurements, as requirements for new
measuring instruments are stated in directives; the most important of these directives being the Measuring Instrument Directive (MID) and the directive on Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments
(NAWI). For many of the instrument categories covered by the directives, there is a national possibility to select the prescription of different accuracy classes for different applications, and furthermore, to decide on what maximum permissible errors (MPEs) to apply in-service.
Based on the text, choose de correct option.
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CEMIG-TELECOM
Provas:
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação
|
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Operação |
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico Contábil |
Q108813
Inglês
Write True (T) or False (F).
( ) Both the sun and wind are good sources because they will end very soon.
( ) Oil, gas, coal or nuclear power are forms of energy that will ultimately finish.
( ) Renewable energy produces material which has been used and is no longer wanted.
( ) Both the sun and wind are good sources because they will end very soon.
( ) Oil, gas, coal or nuclear power are forms of energy that will ultimately finish.
( ) Renewable energy produces material which has been used and is no longer wanted.
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CEMIG-TELECOM
Provas:
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação
|
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Operação |
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico Contábil |
Q108812
Inglês
The text states that the number of people who seek for renewable sources of energy is _________
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CEMIG-TELECOM
Provas:
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação
|
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Operação |
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico Contábil |
Q108811
Inglês
When Betsy says that her cat “is a loner and doesn’t get along well with other cats.” she means that
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CEMIG-TELECOM
Provas:
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação
|
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Operação |
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico Contábil |
Q108810
Inglês
The correct word to complete the sentence “I made a mental list of people and then I turned to a cousin __________ dog had recently died.” is
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CEMIG-TELECOM
Provas:
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação
|
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Operação |
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico Contábil |
Q108809
Inglês
The phrase figure out in “In addition, once you figure out who can take your pets,” means
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CEMIG-TELECOM
Provas:
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Tecnologia da Informação
|
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico de Operação |
FUMARC - 2010 - CEMIG-TELECOM - Técnico Contábil |
Q108808
Inglês
Write True (T) or False (F).
( ) Sherry says the best choice for her is to put off finding someone to take care of her pet.
( ) Jeff states that the most important thing is finding the right person to leave Max with.
( ) Betsy declares that Roo has been the least important thing since she got divorced.
( ) Sherry says the best choice for her is to put off finding someone to take care of her pet.
( ) Jeff states that the most important thing is finding the right person to leave Max with.
( ) Betsy declares that Roo has been the least important thing since she got divorced.
Conheça nossos planos