receiving/ using/ receive

receiving/ using/ to receive

to receive/ to use/ receive

receive/ use/ receiving

to receive/ using/ receiving

therefore

however

furthermore

thus

whereas

The apostrophe indicates plural.

The apostrophe indicates possession and refers to the noun “lab”.

The apostrophe indicates a contraction: the noun “rats” plus the verb “to have”.

The apostrophe indicates that a comparison is being made, hence the use of “like”.

The apostrophe indicates possession and refers to the noun “bodies”.

The author quoted Anne Milton’s exact words, including, between brackets, Milton’s asides to the program audience.

The author opted to transcribe Anne Milton’s exact words and inserted brackets to contextualize what was said.

The author corrected Anne Milton’s grammar by inserting brackets, since people don’t write the same way they talk.

The author notes Anne Milton’s lies and ironically adds what should be the real answer between brackets.

The author highlights Anne Milton’s answer using brackets to point out to the reader the important parts.

I, only

II, only

III, only.

I and II, only.

II and III, only.

silicone manufacturers were unable to keep tabs on implanted patients, which has hindered tests.

medical journals have been warning doctors against the dangerous practice of breast augmentation.

silicone implant manufacturers have absolutely no data on female patients after they get their first surgery.

by selling a faulty product, manufacturers and surgeons alike have a guaranteed source of income.

despite their ultimate efforts to compile data, health authorities have been deceived by silicone implant manufacturers.

there is a cultural assumption, which, in effect, the UK government deployed last week in public, that women deserve no accountability, especially if you can blame the issue on their "vanity".

it is cheaper for everyone, in the long run, to face the problem only when a crisis arises instead of tackling it on its very source; so the UK authorities have adopted a deplorable head-in-the-sand attitude.

women prefer glossy magazines over medicine journals and are generally prone to throw caution out of the window as soon as someone, somehow, offers them the opportunity to get the “perfect body.”

society, as a whole, still treats them as second-class citizens, and lonely voices, as the UK health minister’s or the frightened participants of the Newsnight program’s, still fall in a void and get no answers.

they, unlike men, aren’t very careful with their own health: vanity, as the participants of the Newsnight program have demonstrated, is still the determinant factor when it comes to make choices involving one’s body.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), keeping to its timely recommendations, has made an important modification regarding food-related diseases: it will no longer just wait for them to appear.

Instead of waiting for and solely reacting to foodrelated diseases, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will, as it promised long ago, radically change the way it deals with such outbreaks.

Directed at stopping the sudden eruption of foodrelated diseases (instead of merely reacting to them), the main alteration comes from long-overdue recommendations by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA’s always-postponed decisions regarding related-to-food diseases sparked only reactions (rather than actions) against epidemics — a situation that will now fundamentally change.

Proposals, long overdue, to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have signaled a major change of policy: in order to be prevented (and not merely reacted to), food epidemics are to be targeted in their source.

I. modernization/ II. take/ III. expectedly.

I. conquest/ II. cover/ III. possibly.

I. revamping/ II. comprise. III. similarly.

I. breakthrough/ II. extent. III. equally.

I. renovation/ II. encompass/ III. probably.