Questões de Concurso
Comentadas sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês
Foram encontradas 9.238 questões
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994712
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
In the sentence: "The 'secrecy criterion' is a litmus test;
nevertheless, some critics argue it leads to
surveillance." the connector "nevertheless" introduces
a relation of:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994707
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
In the phrase "They argue that the expansion of the
'cheating' umbrella..." (paragraph 3), the pronoun
"They" refers back to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994700
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
According to the final paragraph, the BNCC's
perspective on teaching English through themes like
"micro-cheating" aims to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994699
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
The expression "occupy a contentious 'grey area'"
(paragraph 1) most accurately conveys that such
behaviors are:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
FUNATEC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI
Prova:
FUNATEC - 2026 - Prefeitura de Matias Olímpio - PI - Professor(a) - Língua Inglesa Anos Finais EJA |
Q3994698
Inglês
Texto associado
PROFESSOR DE LÍNGUA INGLESA:
THE DIGITAL FRONTIER OF FIDELITY
The Nuances of Micro-cheating: Social Practice or Digital
Paranoia ?
In the contemporary landscape of interpersonal
relationships, the ubiquity of social media has recalibrated
the traditional parameters of faithfulness. The emergence of
the term "micro-cheating" serves as a testament to this shift,
encompassing a spectrum of subtle, digitally-mediated
behaviors that, while devoid of physical consummation,
suggest an emotional or erotic redirection. Such actions—
ranging from the seemingly innocuous "double-tap" on an expartner’s archived photograph to the deliberate
concealment of encrypted message threads—occupy a
contentious "grey area" that challenges the binary definition
of infidelity.
From a socio-psychological perspective, micro-cheating is
often interpreted not as an isolated act of betrayal, but as a
symptom of the "validation economy." The digital
architecture of modern platforms encourages a constant
pursuit of external approval, where a notification can
function as a dopamine-inducing ego boost. Consequently,
the ambiguity of intent becomes the focal point of the
debate: is the digital interaction a legitimate exercise of
social autonomy or a covert erosion of the primary
partnership’s exclusivity? Proponents of the concept argue
that the "secrecy criterion" is the ultimate litmus test—if an
interaction is intentionally shielded from a partner’s view, the
threshold of trust has likely been breached.
Conversely, skeptics caution against the pathologization of
digital sociability. They argue that the expansion of the
"cheating" umbrella to include minor online interactions
fosters a climate of hyper-vigilance and domestic
surveillance, potentially undermining the very foundation of
trust it seeks to protect. By labeling these behaviors as
"micro-infidelities," we risk imposing a panoptic gaze on our partners, where every "friend request" is scrutinized for
subversive intent.
For the language educator, this phenomenon provides a rich
semiotic field for classroom reflection. Aligning with the
National Common Curricular Base (BNCC), the study of such
themes transcends mere grammatical decoding. It invites
students to engage in "multiliteracies," analyzing how
meaning is negotiated across digital platforms and how
language (visual, verbal, and symbolic) shapes social ethics.
In this sense, the English language is not merely a system of
signs to be mastered, but a tool for critical agency in a
globalized, hyper-connected world.
Based on the text, the "secrecy criterion" functions
primarily as:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB
Prova:
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Inglesa) |
Q3993530
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for question
Students using A.I. over humans to learn English (23rd December 2024)
More and more students in Japan are using artificial intelligence (AI) to learn English and other languages. The language learning app Duolingo conducted a survey on how students study languages. More than 4,700 Japanese students answered questions about their language-learning habits. The survey found that the number of people using ChatGPT and other AI tools increased by more than 80 per cent in 2024. AI was particularly popular with younger people. The researchers said more young people used AI than took face-to-face lessons. However, some people in their 20s were not totally happy with AI lessons. They said AI lacked natural responses and was a little boring.
Duolingo said: "We're in the midst of an AI revolution.…Technology has long had an impact on language learning." It found that apps were the most popular method in Japan to learn languages. English was the most studied language, followed by Korean. People are studying Korean "to understand the language as spoken by…favourite artists and celebrities." Duolingo said around 58 per cent of people who took the survey used language-learning apps. This was followed by video streaming platforms like YouTube and Netflix (37%), textbooks (36%) and online lessons (16%). The number of people going to a language school is decreasing. Just 13.8 per cent of people went to classes with a teacher.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/12/19/japan/chatgpt-english-lessons/
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20241218/p2a/00m/0li/017000c
https://blog.duolingo.com/2024-duolingo-language-report/
Based on the statistical data provided, which conclusion can be drawn regarding the hierarchy of language-learning preferences among
the surveyed students?
Ano: 2026
Banca:
CPCON
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB
Prova:
CPCON - 2026 - Prefeitura de Nova Floresta - PB - Professor Magistério - Classe B (Língua Inglesa) |
Q3993529
Inglês
Texto associado
Text for question
Students using A.I. over humans to learn English (23rd December 2024)
More and more students in Japan are using artificial intelligence (AI) to learn English and other languages. The language learning app Duolingo conducted a survey on how students study languages. More than 4,700 Japanese students answered questions about their language-learning habits. The survey found that the number of people using ChatGPT and other AI tools increased by more than 80 per cent in 2024. AI was particularly popular with younger people. The researchers said more young people used AI than took face-to-face lessons. However, some people in their 20s were not totally happy with AI lessons. They said AI lacked natural responses and was a little boring.
Duolingo said: "We're in the midst of an AI revolution.…Technology has long had an impact on language learning." It found that apps were the most popular method in Japan to learn languages. English was the most studied language, followed by Korean. People are studying Korean "to understand the language as spoken by…favourite artists and celebrities." Duolingo said around 58 per cent of people who took the survey used language-learning apps. This was followed by video streaming platforms like YouTube and Netflix (37%), textbooks (36%) and online lessons (16%). The number of people going to a language school is decreasing. Just 13.8 per cent of people went to classes with a teacher.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/12/19/japan/chatgpt-english-lessons/
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20241218/p2a/00m/0li/017000c
https://blog.duolingo.com/2024-duolingo-language-report/
Which of the following statements best synthesizes the trends and sentiments regarding language learning tools in Japan as described
in the text?
Ano: 2026
Banca:
Avança SP
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Prova:
Avança SP - 2026 - Prefeitura de Louveira - SP - Professor de Inglês |
Q3989976
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
The Tipping Point.
Last week at my neighborhood coffee shop, the barista flipped that dreaded tablet toward me. Three tip options glared back: 18%. 22%. 25%. For a $3.50 latte I was picking up. That took thirty seconds to make. I’ve hit my breaking point with tipping culture.
Growing up, tipping was simple: 15–20% for sitdown restaurants, maybe your hairdresser. Now it’s an expected tax on every transaction. The frozen yogurt shop where I serve myself wants 20%. Self-checkout kiosks are asking for tips. This is insane.
When I traveled Europe last summer, I paid exactly what was on the menu. No guilt, no calculations, no awkward pressure. Servers were paid living wages and the service was excellent.
Meanwhile, I’m expected to subsidize corporate America’s refusal to pay fair wages while their CEOs pocket millions in bonuses.
It’s 2025, and American tipping culture has spiraled out of control. It’s hurting workers, stressing customers, and letting profitable businesses guilt-trip their own customers into covering payroll. When I worked retail years ago, my employer paid my full wage. I didn’t expect customers to subsidize my paycheck because my boss decided to pocket the difference. Yet somehow in 2025, we’ve normalized corporations outsourcing their payroll responsibility to guilt-ridden customers. 72% of U.S. adults say tipping is expected in more places today than it was five years ago. But even as Americans say they’re being asked to tip more often, only about a third say it’s extremely or very easy to know whether (34%) or how much (33%) to tip for various services.
[...] The confusion is real and it’s intentional. Companies benefit from our uncertainty because confused customers tend to over-tip rather than risk social judgment.
Murdock, Jeff. Why Is Tipping Culture Out of Control in 2025? Medium. 16 Jun. 2025. Disponível em:<https://medium.com/@frat1309/why-is-tipping-cultureout-of-control-in-2025-im-done-subsidizing-corporategreed-76ba74887b82>
Based on the text, how does the author's
experience in Europe contrast with his
experience in America?
Ano: 2026
Banca:
Avança SP
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Prova:
Avança SP - 2026 - Prefeitura de Louveira - SP - Professor de Inglês |
Q3989975
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
The Tipping Point.
Last week at my neighborhood coffee shop, the barista flipped that dreaded tablet toward me. Three tip options glared back: 18%. 22%. 25%. For a $3.50 latte I was picking up. That took thirty seconds to make. I’ve hit my breaking point with tipping culture.
Growing up, tipping was simple: 15–20% for sitdown restaurants, maybe your hairdresser. Now it’s an expected tax on every transaction. The frozen yogurt shop where I serve myself wants 20%. Self-checkout kiosks are asking for tips. This is insane.
When I traveled Europe last summer, I paid exactly what was on the menu. No guilt, no calculations, no awkward pressure. Servers were paid living wages and the service was excellent.
Meanwhile, I’m expected to subsidize corporate America’s refusal to pay fair wages while their CEOs pocket millions in bonuses.
It’s 2025, and American tipping culture has spiraled out of control. It’s hurting workers, stressing customers, and letting profitable businesses guilt-trip their own customers into covering payroll. When I worked retail years ago, my employer paid my full wage. I didn’t expect customers to subsidize my paycheck because my boss decided to pocket the difference. Yet somehow in 2025, we’ve normalized corporations outsourcing their payroll responsibility to guilt-ridden customers. 72% of U.S. adults say tipping is expected in more places today than it was five years ago. But even as Americans say they’re being asked to tip more often, only about a third say it’s extremely or very easy to know whether (34%) or how much (33%) to tip for various services.
[...] The confusion is real and it’s intentional. Companies benefit from our uncertainty because confused customers tend to over-tip rather than risk social judgment.
Murdock, Jeff. Why Is Tipping Culture Out of Control in 2025? Medium. 16 Jun. 2025. Disponível em:<https://medium.com/@frat1309/why-is-tipping-cultureout-of-control-in-2025-im-done-subsidizing-corporategreed-76ba74887b82>
In the excerpt “72% of U.S. adults say tipping is
expected in more places today than it was five
years ago.”, the comparative structure expresses:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
Avança SP
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Prova:
Avança SP - 2026 - Prefeitura de Louveira - SP - Professor de Inglês |
Q3989972
Inglês
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question.
The Tipping Point.
Last week at my neighborhood coffee shop, the barista flipped that dreaded tablet toward me. Three tip options glared back: 18%. 22%. 25%. For a $3.50 latte I was picking up. That took thirty seconds to make. I’ve hit my breaking point with tipping culture.
Growing up, tipping was simple: 15–20% for sitdown restaurants, maybe your hairdresser. Now it’s an expected tax on every transaction. The frozen yogurt shop where I serve myself wants 20%. Self-checkout kiosks are asking for tips. This is insane.
When I traveled Europe last summer, I paid exactly what was on the menu. No guilt, no calculations, no awkward pressure. Servers were paid living wages and the service was excellent.
Meanwhile, I’m expected to subsidize corporate America’s refusal to pay fair wages while their CEOs pocket millions in bonuses.
It’s 2025, and American tipping culture has spiraled out of control. It’s hurting workers, stressing customers, and letting profitable businesses guilt-trip their own customers into covering payroll. When I worked retail years ago, my employer paid my full wage. I didn’t expect customers to subsidize my paycheck because my boss decided to pocket the difference. Yet somehow in 2025, we’ve normalized corporations outsourcing their payroll responsibility to guilt-ridden customers. 72% of U.S. adults say tipping is expected in more places today than it was five years ago. But even as Americans say they’re being asked to tip more often, only about a third say it’s extremely or very easy to know whether (34%) or how much (33%) to tip for various services.
[...] The confusion is real and it’s intentional. Companies benefit from our uncertainty because confused customers tend to over-tip rather than risk social judgment.
Murdock, Jeff. Why Is Tipping Culture Out of Control in 2025? Medium. 16 Jun. 2025. Disponível em:<https://medium.com/@frat1309/why-is-tipping-cultureout-of-control-in-2025-im-done-subsidizing-corporategreed-76ba74887b82>
In the sentence “I’ve hit my breaking point with
tipping culture.”, the expression “hit my
breaking point” is closest in meaning to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988646
Inglês
“In many Brazilian public universities, English
instruction has historically prioritized the
development of strategic reading abilities,
enabling learners to extract relevant information
from academic texts in their fields, rather than
pursuing full oral fluency.” (Excerpt adapted from:
Celani [1988]; Ramos [2005]. “Brazilian ESP
tradition”)
The pedagogical orientation described aligns most closely with:
The pedagogical orientation described aligns most closely with:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988636
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Throughout the text, the author progressively
moves from describing the rapid expansion of
generative AI in education (paragraph 1), to raising
ethical and pedagogical concerns (paragraph 2), to
identifying systemic gaps in training (paragraph 3),
and finally to advocating coordinated policy
investment (paragraphs 4 and 5). This progression
indicates that the author’s primary argumentative
strategy consists of:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988635
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm
shifts”. Considering the context of the passage,
the expression “paradigm shifts” is most nearly
synonymous with:
A ( ) incremental
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988634
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of
AI technology continues to outpace
implementation support and essential training for
teachers.” (paragraph 3)
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988633
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide
students as they grapple with the existential and
social implications of AI alongside practical
concerns for their own and students’ futures.”
(paragraph 2)
In this context, the adjective “existential” most precisely suggests issues that are:
In this context, the adjective “existential” most precisely suggests issues that are:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988632
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“Despite growing resources, the development of
AI technology continues to outpace
implementation support and essential training for
teachers. This widening gap between teacher
competencies and the demands of an AI-infused
classroom is unsustainable.” (paragraph 3)
Within the context in use, the word “unsustainable” most nearly conveys the idea that the situation is:
Within the context in use, the word “unsustainable” most nearly conveys the idea that the situation is:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988631
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In the final paragraph, the author reinforces the
overall argument by emphasizing that:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988630
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Paragraph 4 advances the argument that effective
AI integration in schools depends on:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988629
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Paragraph 3 suggests that the central tension in
current AI implementation in education lies in:
Ano: 2026
Banca:
IBAM
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ
Prova:
IBAM - 2026 - Prefeitura de Armação de Búzios - RJ - Professor Docente II - Língua Inglesa |
Q3988628
Inglês
Texto associado
With the rapid advancement of generative
artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been
thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom
reality. The public, including many students, now
has widespread access to GenAI tools and large
language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use
these tools with schoolwork. School boards have
taken different approaches to regulating or
integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers,
meanwhile, find themselves responding to these
paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and
wider expectations AI raises.
There are many questions about the
purpose of education, including questions around
academic integrity and how education can uphold
fairness and equity. Questions include: How can
students successfully navigate the use of these
tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can
schools prepare students for the future as
organizations and institutions scramble to
determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of
AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical
thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are
uniquely positioned to help guide students as they
grapple with the existential and social implications
of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and
students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this
complex challenge alone — they need support and
to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important
role.
There’s a growing international consensus
echoed by calls to action that teachers are
essential players as learners develop AI literacy.
Despite growing resources, the development of AI
technology continues to outpace implementation
support and essential training for teachers. This
widening gap between teacher competencies and
the demands of an AI-infused classroom is
unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping
pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers
to guide the next generation in a world transformed
by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and
confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide
students and shape students’ critical and
responsible engagement with this technology.
Teachers cannot do this alone.
Successfully integrating AI into education requires
a concerted and collaborative effort from all
stakeholders within the educational ecosystem.
Together, these partners can help establish clear,
strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate
robust funding for essential tools and
comprehensive training and research to foster
innovative spaces where educators and
researchers can experiment and study practices.
Research is needed to assess the broader effects
of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and
cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand
the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is
not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across
all jurisdictions.
Implementation should also consider
teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities
that teachers carry. What can be removed, and
what robust supports can be provided so teachers
can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to
recognize that investing in teachers is one of the
most powerful ways we can invest in our students
and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
According to paragraph 2, the debate surrounding
AI in education extends beyond classroom
management and includes:
Conheça nossos planos