Questões de Concurso Comentadas sobre interpretação de texto | reading comprehension em inglês

Foram encontradas 8.692 questões

Q3790620 Inglês
Leia o trecho:
Although several of the reports presented inconsistencies, they did not compromise the final assessment, as they were later validated.
A interpretação mais adequada das cadeias referenciais é:  
Alternativas
Q3790619 Inglês
Um texto produzido por uma ONG internacional combina: (1) dados estatísticos, (2) depoimentos de comunidades vulneráveis, (3) infográficos interativos e (4) recomendações políticas dirigidas a governos. A classificação adequada, considerando função social e composição discursiva, é: 
Alternativas
Q3790615 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
In the third paragraph, the author suggests that AI invites us to confront, with uncomfortable clarity, the parts of ourselves we outsource. Considering the metaphorical structure and the argumentative movement of the text as a whole, the most accurate interpretation is that this statement: 
Alternativas
Q3790614 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
From a global reading of the text, one may infer that the author views the human–AI relationship as:  
Alternativas
Q3790613 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
Which interpretation most closely aligns with the central argument of the final paragraph?  
Alternativas
Q3790612 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
In the third paragraph, the author states that AI mirrors human beings. In context, this metaphor implies that:  
Alternativas
Q3790611 Inglês
Artificial Intelligence and the Quiet Rewriting of Human Routine


   Artificial Intelligence has been described in countless wayssome call it a convenience, others a threat, and a few insist it is merely the latest chapter in humanity’s old habit of outsourcing effort. Yet, beneath the dramatic forecasts and the buzzwords, AI seems to be performing a quieter, more subversive task: it is rewriting the texture of everyday life, often without asking for permission.

   Most people do not wake up thinking about algorithms, but algorithms wake up thinking about themmapping their routes, anticipating their questions, filtering their choices before they even notice a choice was available. This silent mediation does not necessarily diminish human autonomy; in certain cases, it sharpens it, freeing time and mental energy for pursuits that once felt like luxuries. Paradoxically, by delegating some decisions to a machine, individuals may finally reclaim the space to make the decisions that matter.

   Among the many voices in this debate, one observation remains underrated: AI is not replacing human beings so much as mirroring them. The technology amplifies intentions, good or bad, ethical or messy, visionary or short-sighted. A system trained to assist can become generous; one trained on cruelty can become cruel. This reveals an inconvenient but liberating truthAI does not create our moral landscape; it inherits it.

   And then there is the relational side of the phenomenon. Some people confess, half-embarrassed, that they speak to AI tools the way they once spoke to a wise friend: with candor, expectation, sometimes frustration, sometimes relief. Strangely, the machine answers. Not perfectly, not infallibly, but attentivelyan attentiveness that humans often forget to offer one another in the rush of contemporary life. Whether this represents progress or a peculiar loneliness disguised as innovation is a debate still very much alive.

   What seems undeniable is that AI, far from being a distant futuristic concept, has become a companion in humanity’s daily improvisation. It is not here to mimic our intelligence but to challenge our assumptions about what intelligence ever was. And perhaps, in doing so, it reminds us of something unexpectedly humble: that the future is not written by the smartest machine, but by the kindest human capable of choosing what to build next. 
Considering the author’s portrayal of AI as a force that subtly rearranges human habits, choose the option that best captures the paradox suggested in the second paragraph regarding autonomy and decision-making. 
Alternativas
Q3790084 Inglês
Instrumental English (ESP) focuses on developing specific reading strategies to extract information efficiently from technical texts without necessarily translating every word. Select the alternative that correctly defines the cognitive strategy of "Inferencing" within a reading comprehension context.
Alternativas
Q3784579 Inglês
Learning a foreign language provides benefits that go beyond communication. Analyze the statements regarding the purposes of language learning:
I.It fosters cognitive development, enhancing memory, attention, and problem-solving skills.
II.It promotes intercultural competence, allowing students to understand and value different cultures and perspectives.
III.It aims to replace the student's native culture and language with those of the foreign country entirely.

The correct statement(s) is/are:
Alternativas
Q3784577 Inglês
Skimming is a reading strategy often taught to English students. The main purpose of skimming is: 
Alternativas
Q3784572 Inglês
Assessment in the classroom helps guide learning. Analyze the statements about assessment types:
I.Formative assessment involves providing ongoing feedback during the learning process to help students improve.
II.Summative assessment usually happens at the end of a unit or course to evaluate what has been learned (e.g., a final exam).
III.Self-assessment encourages students to reflect on their own learning progress and identify areas for improvement.

The correct statement(s) is/are: 
Alternativas
Q3783582 Inglês

Reading Comprehension


Modern supermarkets


Many of the major supermarket chains have come under fire with accusations of various unethical acts over the past decade. They’ve wasted loads of food, they’ve underpaid their suppliers and they’ve contributed to excessive plastic waste in their packaging, which has had its impact on our environment.


But supermarkets and grocers are starting to sit up and take notice. In response to growing consumer backlash against the huge amounts of plastic waste generated by plastic packaging, some of the largest UK supermarkets have signed up to a pact promising to transform packaging and cut plastic wastage. In a pledge to reuse, recycle or compost all plastic wastage by 2025, supermarkets are now beginning to take some responsibility for the part they play in contributing to the damage to our environment, with one major supermarket announcing their plan to eliminate all plastic packaging in their own-brand products by 2023.


In response to criticisms over food waste, some supermarkets are donating some of their food surplus. However, charities estimate that they are only accessing two per cent of supermarkets’ total food surplus, so this hardly seems to be solving the problem. Some say that supermarkets are simply not doing enough. Most supermarkets operate under a veil of secrecy when asked for exact figures of food wastage, and without more transparency it is hard to come up with a systematic approach to avoiding waste and to redistributing surplus food.


Some smaller companies are now taking matters into their own hands and offering consumers a greener, more environmentally friendly option. Shops like Berlin’s Original Unverpakt and London’s Bulk Market are plastic-free shops that have opened in recent years, encouraging customers to use their own containers or compostable bags. Online grocer Farmdrop eliminates the need for large warehouses and the risk of huge food surplus by delivering fresh produce from local farmers to its customers on a daily basis via electric cars, offering farmers the lion’s share of the retail price.


There is no doubt that we still have a long way to go in reducing food waste and plastic waste. But perhaps the major supermarkets might take inspiration from these smaller grocers and gradually move towards a more sustainable future for us all.


(adapted from www.britishcouncil.org)

Read the following paragraph about supermarkets:
Two of the things that major supermarkets have been ................................ for are the waste of large amounts of excess food and unnecessary plastic usage in a lot of product packaging. Some supermarkets have ................................ to try and reduce plastic wastage, and one supermarket has said that it would get ................................ of all plastic packaging from its own in-house brands. Meanwhile, many supermarkets are not very transparent about the exact amount of food that is going to waste and so it’s hard for charities to know how to redistribute this surplus .................................
Select the alternative that correctly completes the blanks in the sentence.
Alternativas
Q3783581 Inglês

Reading Comprehension


Modern supermarkets


Many of the major supermarket chains have come under fire with accusations of various unethical acts over the past decade. They’ve wasted loads of food, they’ve underpaid their suppliers and they’ve contributed to excessive plastic waste in their packaging, which has had its impact on our environment.


But supermarkets and grocers are starting to sit up and take notice. In response to growing consumer backlash against the huge amounts of plastic waste generated by plastic packaging, some of the largest UK supermarkets have signed up to a pact promising to transform packaging and cut plastic wastage. In a pledge to reuse, recycle or compost all plastic wastage by 2025, supermarkets are now beginning to take some responsibility for the part they play in contributing to the damage to our environment, with one major supermarket announcing their plan to eliminate all plastic packaging in their own-brand products by 2023.


In response to criticisms over food waste, some supermarkets are donating some of their food surplus. However, charities estimate that they are only accessing two per cent of supermarkets’ total food surplus, so this hardly seems to be solving the problem. Some say that supermarkets are simply not doing enough. Most supermarkets operate under a veil of secrecy when asked for exact figures of food wastage, and without more transparency it is hard to come up with a systematic approach to avoiding waste and to redistributing surplus food.


Some smaller companies are now taking matters into their own hands and offering consumers a greener, more environmentally friendly option. Shops like Berlin’s Original Unverpakt and London’s Bulk Market are plastic-free shops that have opened in recent years, encouraging customers to use their own containers or compostable bags. Online grocer Farmdrop eliminates the need for large warehouses and the risk of huge food surplus by delivering fresh produce from local farmers to its customers on a daily basis via electric cars, offering farmers the lion’s share of the retail price.


There is no doubt that we still have a long way to go in reducing food waste and plastic waste. But perhaps the major supermarkets might take inspiration from these smaller grocers and gradually move towards a more sustainable future for us all.


(adapted from www.britishcouncil.org)

Study these sentences and decide if they are true ( T ) or false ( F ), according to the text.
( ) More and more people want supermarkets to reduce the amount of plastic waste they produce.
( ) By 2025, many of the major supermarkets will have stopped using plastic in their in-house products.
( ) Supermarkets are still denying that plastic packaging can cause damage to our environment.
( ) Supermarkets are not telling people how much food they are actually wasting.
Choose the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
Alternativas
Q3783580 Inglês

Reading Comprehension


Modern supermarkets


Many of the major supermarket chains have come under fire with accusations of various unethical acts over the past decade. They’ve wasted loads of food, they’ve underpaid their suppliers and they’ve contributed to excessive plastic waste in their packaging, which has had its impact on our environment.


But supermarkets and grocers are starting to sit up and take notice. In response to growing consumer backlash against the huge amounts of plastic waste generated by plastic packaging, some of the largest UK supermarkets have signed up to a pact promising to transform packaging and cut plastic wastage. In a pledge to reuse, recycle or compost all plastic wastage by 2025, supermarkets are now beginning to take some responsibility for the part they play in contributing to the damage to our environment, with one major supermarket announcing their plan to eliminate all plastic packaging in their own-brand products by 2023.


In response to criticisms over food waste, some supermarkets are donating some of their food surplus. However, charities estimate that they are only accessing two per cent of supermarkets’ total food surplus, so this hardly seems to be solving the problem. Some say that supermarkets are simply not doing enough. Most supermarkets operate under a veil of secrecy when asked for exact figures of food wastage, and without more transparency it is hard to come up with a systematic approach to avoiding waste and to redistributing surplus food.


Some smaller companies are now taking matters into their own hands and offering consumers a greener, more environmentally friendly option. Shops like Berlin’s Original Unverpakt and London’s Bulk Market are plastic-free shops that have opened in recent years, encouraging customers to use their own containers or compostable bags. Online grocer Farmdrop eliminates the need for large warehouses and the risk of huge food surplus by delivering fresh produce from local farmers to its customers on a daily basis via electric cars, offering farmers the lion’s share of the retail price.


There is no doubt that we still have a long way to go in reducing food waste and plastic waste. But perhaps the major supermarkets might take inspiration from these smaller grocers and gradually move towards a more sustainable future for us all.


(adapted from www.britishcouncil.org)

Analyze the sentences below about the text.
1. There is a grocer in Berlin that doesn’t allow customers to use their own containers.
2. Farmdrop doesn’t store large amounts of food and so doesn’t produce unnecessary waste.
3. Farmers supplying food to Farmdrop get a small fraction of the price that customers pay.
4. The author believes that small shops like Bulk Market and Farmdrop will eventually take over the major supermarkets.
Choose the alternative which contains the correct affirmatives.
Alternativas
Q3781920 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:

        There are differences between content-based language teaching (CBLT) and content and language integrated learning (CLIL), the main one being that CBLT deals with teaching content in language lessons, whereas CLIL deals with teaching a subject at the same time as teaching language. CLIL is also different from immersion, where learners learn all their subjects in another language and there is no focus on language in subject lessons, for example in an international school. These ideas can be visualised as a continuum. On the left-hand side of the continuum, content-based language teaching is where language teachers teach another language through content - so the focus is on language and the input for language classes is topics based on subject content. On the right-hand side of the continuum, learners are working all the time in another language. CLIL can be placed somewhere in the middle of the continuum: learners are learning content through another language. Typically, they have a number of lessons in one or more subjects per week in another language (for example, geography, history, science, PE or music) and the rest of their lessons in their first language.

(Liz Dale, Rosie Tanner. CLIL activities: a resource for subjects and language teachers)
According to the text, the primary difference between Content-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is
Alternativas
Q3781918 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:

        Creativity is a quality which manifests itself in many different ways, and this is one of the reasons it has proved so difficult to define. As Amabile (1996) points out, ‘a clear and sufficiently detailed articulation of the creative process is not yet possible.’ Yet we readily recognise creativity when we meet it, even if we cannot define it precisely. For all practical purposes this is enough, and we do not need to spend too much time agonising over a definition.

        There are of course some features which are almost always present in a creative act. The core idea of ‘making something new’ is at the heart of creativity. But novelty is not alone sufficient for something to be recognised as creative. We could, for example, wear a clown’s red nose to class. This would certainly be doing something new and unusual but it would only count as creative if we then did something with it, like creating a new persona. It is also necessary for creative acts to be recognised and accepted within the domain in which they occur. They need to be relevant and practicable – not just novel. Sometimes creative ideas are ahead of their time and have to wait for technology to catch up. Leonardo da Vinci designed an aeroplane in the 15th century, but before aeroplanes could become a reality, materials and fuels had to be available.

        […]

        […] Boden (1990) takes an AI (artificial intelligence) approach to investigating creativity. She asks what a computer would need to do to replicate human thought processes. This leads to a consideration of the self-organising properties of complex, generative systems through processes such as parallel distributed processing. For her, creativity arises from the systematic exploration of a conceptual space or domain (mathematical, musical or linguistic). She draws attention to the importance of constraints in this process. ‘Far from being the antithesis of creativity, constraints on thinking are what make it possible’ (p. 82). Chaos theory (Gleick, 1987) tends to support her ideas. Boden’s approach is richly suggestive for language acquisition, materials writing and for teaching, in that all are rooted in complex, self-organising systems.

(Alan Maley, Nik Peachey. Creativity in the English language classroom.)
What conclusion does the author draw about the necessity of achieving a precise, universally accepted definition of creativity?
Alternativas
Q3781917 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:

        Creativity is a quality which manifests itself in many different ways, and this is one of the reasons it has proved so difficult to define. As Amabile (1996) points out, ‘a clear and sufficiently detailed articulation of the creative process is not yet possible.’ Yet we readily recognise creativity when we meet it, even if we cannot define it precisely. For all practical purposes this is enough, and we do not need to spend too much time agonising over a definition.

        There are of course some features which are almost always present in a creative act. The core idea of ‘making something new’ is at the heart of creativity. But novelty is not alone sufficient for something to be recognised as creative. We could, for example, wear a clown’s red nose to class. This would certainly be doing something new and unusual but it would only count as creative if we then did something with it, like creating a new persona. It is also necessary for creative acts to be recognised and accepted within the domain in which they occur. They need to be relevant and practicable – not just novel. Sometimes creative ideas are ahead of their time and have to wait for technology to catch up. Leonardo da Vinci designed an aeroplane in the 15th century, but before aeroplanes could become a reality, materials and fuels had to be available.

        […]

        […] Boden (1990) takes an AI (artificial intelligence) approach to investigating creativity. She asks what a computer would need to do to replicate human thought processes. This leads to a consideration of the self-organising properties of complex, generative systems through processes such as parallel distributed processing. For her, creativity arises from the systematic exploration of a conceptual space or domain (mathematical, musical or linguistic). She draws attention to the importance of constraints in this process. ‘Far from being the antithesis of creativity, constraints on thinking are what make it possible’ (p. 82). Chaos theory (Gleick, 1987) tends to support her ideas. Boden’s approach is richly suggestive for language acquisition, materials writing and for teaching, in that all are rooted in complex, self-organising systems.

(Alan Maley, Nik Peachey. Creativity in the English language classroom.)
According to the second paragraph, in addition to being new, the necessary condition for an act or idea to be recognized and accepted as creative within its specific domain is
Alternativas
Q3781910 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:

        The learning principles that good games incorporate are by no means unknown to researchers in the learning sciences. In fact current research on learning supports the sorts of learning principles that good games use, though these principles are often exemplified in games in particularly striking ways (for a survey and citations of the literature, see Gee 2003). However, many of these principles are much better reflected in good games than they are in today’s schools, where we also ask young people to learn complex and challenging things. With the current return in our schools to skill-and-drill and curricula driven by standardized tests, good learning principles have, more and more, been left on the cognitive scientist’s laboratory bench and, I will argue, inside good computer and video games.

        Game design involves modeling human interactions with and within complex virtual worlds, including learning processes as part and parcel of these interactions. This is, in fact, not unlike design research in educational psychology where researchers model new forms of interaction connected to learning in classrooms (complex worlds, indeed), study such interactions to better understand how and why they lead to deep learning, and then ultimately disseminate them across a great many classrooms (see, for example, the chapters in Kelly 2003).

(James Paulo Gee. Situated Language and Learning: a critique of traditional schooling)
Based on the author’s comparison of game design to design research in education, a pedagogical practice an English as a Foreign Language teacher should prioritize to move beyond the criticized approach is
Alternativas
Q3781909 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:

        The learning principles that good games incorporate are by no means unknown to researchers in the learning sciences. In fact current research on learning supports the sorts of learning principles that good games use, though these principles are often exemplified in games in particularly striking ways (for a survey and citations of the literature, see Gee 2003). However, many of these principles are much better reflected in good games than they are in today’s schools, where we also ask young people to learn complex and challenging things. With the current return in our schools to skill-and-drill and curricula driven by standardized tests, good learning principles have, more and more, been left on the cognitive scientist’s laboratory bench and, I will argue, inside good computer and video games.

        Game design involves modeling human interactions with and within complex virtual worlds, including learning processes as part and parcel of these interactions. This is, in fact, not unlike design research in educational psychology where researchers model new forms of interaction connected to learning in classrooms (complex worlds, indeed), study such interactions to better understand how and why they lead to deep learning, and then ultimately disseminate them across a great many classrooms (see, for example, the chapters in Kelly 2003).

(James Paulo Gee. Situated Language and Learning: a critique of traditional schooling)
According to the author, “good learning principles” are neglected and relegated because of
Alternativas
Q3781907 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder a questão:

Language monitor

        A new topic area will quickly generate the need to acquire new language in the form of vocabulary, structures, and pronunciation. It is a good idea to have ready a way of coping with this demand.

        If students can feel that they have the time and opportunity to master the use of language that either you or they have identified as being necessary for a certain stage in a project, this will go a long way to increasing their confidence and language competence.

        One way to do this is to produce a language monitor which focuses on vocabulary and structures that have been identified as being useful.

        This allows other students to read it and absorb the word or phrase, the meaning, pronunciation, associated words or collocations, and how to use it in a sentence. They can also add their own cards. The vocabulary monitor remains on the noticeboard throughout the project, constantly available for reinforcement and consolidation. It can also be used as a source of vocabulary games.

        In addition to this or as an alternative, if you have suitable computer facilities available, electronic lists could be created. Students can add to the lists in the same way as the noticeboard. The updated list can be printed out at regular intervals and put on the noticeboard and handouts given to the students.

(Diana L. Fried-Booth. Project Work. Adaptado)
According to the text, the main purpose of the “Language Monitor” is to
Alternativas
Respostas
481: C
482: A
483: B
484: D
485: C
486: A
487: B
488: D
489: D
490: A
491: D
492: E
493: C
494: B
495: A
496: D
497: B
498: B
499: D
500: C