Questões de Concurso Público Prefeitura de Serrana - SP 2018 para Professor de Educação Básica - Inglês

Foram encontradas 24 questões

Q1095654 Inglês
As palavras speak, sound and make têm, respectivamente, o mesmo som vocálico que
Alternativas
Q1095656 Inglês
Leia o texto e responda a questão.

    The analysis of the relationship between forms and functions of language is commonly called discourse analysis, which encompasses the notion that language is more than a sentence-level phenomenon. A single sentence can seldom be fully analyzed without considering its context. We use language in stretches of discourse. We string many sentences together in interrelated, cohesive units. In most oral language, our discourse is marked by exchanges with another person or several persons in which a few sentences spoken by one participant are followed and built upon by sentences spoken by another. Speakers formulate representations of meaning not just from a single sentence but also from referents in both previous sentences and following sentences.

Consider the following:
A. Got the time?
B. Ten fifteen.

Waiter: More coffee?
Customer: I’m okay.

Parent: Dinner!
Child: Just a minute!

    In so many of our everyday exchanges, a single sentence sometimes contains certain presuppositions that are not overtly manifested in surrounding sentence-level surface structure, but that are clear from the total context. All three of the above conversations contained such presuppositions (how to ask what time of day it is; how to say “no more coffee”; how to announce dinner and then indicate one will be there in a minute). Without the pragmatic contexts of discourse, our communications would be extraordinarily ambiguous.

(H. Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching 5th edition ed.Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
De acordo com o primeiro parágrafo, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Q1095657 Inglês
Leia o texto e responda a questão.

    The analysis of the relationship between forms and functions of language is commonly called discourse analysis, which encompasses the notion that language is more than a sentence-level phenomenon. A single sentence can seldom be fully analyzed without considering its context. We use language in stretches of discourse. We string many sentences together in interrelated, cohesive units. In most oral language, our discourse is marked by exchanges with another person or several persons in which a few sentences spoken by one participant are followed and built upon by sentences spoken by another. Speakers formulate representations of meaning not just from a single sentence but also from referents in both previous sentences and following sentences.

Consider the following:
A. Got the time?
B. Ten fifteen.

Waiter: More coffee?
Customer: I’m okay.

Parent: Dinner!
Child: Just a minute!

    In so many of our everyday exchanges, a single sentence sometimes contains certain presuppositions that are not overtly manifested in surrounding sentence-level surface structure, but that are clear from the total context. All three of the above conversations contained such presuppositions (how to ask what time of day it is; how to say “no more coffee”; how to announce dinner and then indicate one will be there in a minute). Without the pragmatic contexts of discourse, our communications would be extraordinarily ambiguous.

(H. Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching 5th edition ed.Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
Na frase do primeiro parágrafo – A single sentence can seldom be fully analyzed without considering its context. –, os termos destacados podem ser traduzidos, sem alteração de sentido, por
Alternativas
Q1095658 Inglês
Leia o texto e responda a questão.

    The analysis of the relationship between forms and functions of language is commonly called discourse analysis, which encompasses the notion that language is more than a sentence-level phenomenon. A single sentence can seldom be fully analyzed without considering its context. We use language in stretches of discourse. We string many sentences together in interrelated, cohesive units. In most oral language, our discourse is marked by exchanges with another person or several persons in which a few sentences spoken by one participant are followed and built upon by sentences spoken by another. Speakers formulate representations of meaning not just from a single sentence but also from referents in both previous sentences and following sentences.

Consider the following:
A. Got the time?
B. Ten fifteen.

Waiter: More coffee?
Customer: I’m okay.

Parent: Dinner!
Child: Just a minute!

    In so many of our everyday exchanges, a single sentence sometimes contains certain presuppositions that are not overtly manifested in surrounding sentence-level surface structure, but that are clear from the total context. All three of the above conversations contained such presuppositions (how to ask what time of day it is; how to say “no more coffee”; how to announce dinner and then indicate one will be there in a minute). Without the pragmatic contexts of discourse, our communications would be extraordinarily ambiguous.

(H. Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching 5th edition ed.Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
From the reading of the first paragraph, it is correct to understand that, in language teaching,
Alternativas
Q1095659 Inglês
Leia o texto e responda a questão.

    The analysis of the relationship between forms and functions of language is commonly called discourse analysis, which encompasses the notion that language is more than a sentence-level phenomenon. A single sentence can seldom be fully analyzed without considering its context. We use language in stretches of discourse. We string many sentences together in interrelated, cohesive units. In most oral language, our discourse is marked by exchanges with another person or several persons in which a few sentences spoken by one participant are followed and built upon by sentences spoken by another. Speakers formulate representations of meaning not just from a single sentence but also from referents in both previous sentences and following sentences.

Consider the following:
A. Got the time?
B. Ten fifteen.

Waiter: More coffee?
Customer: I’m okay.

Parent: Dinner!
Child: Just a minute!

    In so many of our everyday exchanges, a single sentence sometimes contains certain presuppositions that are not overtly manifested in surrounding sentence-level surface structure, but that are clear from the total context. All three of the above conversations contained such presuppositions (how to ask what time of day it is; how to say “no more coffee”; how to announce dinner and then indicate one will be there in a minute). Without the pragmatic contexts of discourse, our communications would be extraordinarily ambiguous.

(H. Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching 5th edition ed.Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
Os três breves diálogos estão presentes neste texto com o objetivo de
Alternativas
Respostas
16: B
17: E
18: C
19: E
20: D